CALIFAGS HABBENING

CALIFAGS HABBENING
PIC RELATED, 32310 (high cap mag ban) NULLIFIED

Attached: Screenshot_20190329-152929.jpg (720x1280, 420K)

Other urls found in this thread:

michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Duncan-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf
courtlistener.com/docket/6082773/duncan-v-becerra/
nraila.org/articles/20190329/breaking-federal-court-finds-california-magazine-ban-violates-the-second-amendment
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Nope

Link

This has to be extremely fresh or fake, literally no news mentioning this.

Do you honestly believe Feinstein is going to uphold that?!?!?!?
I'm fucking dying. She's going to wait until democrats are in power and wait until it's overturned.

michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Duncan-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

I want to believe.

courtlistener.com/docket/6082773/duncan-v-becerra/

This is huge

Explain this to legal brainlets

Comifornia law that makes mags larger than 10 round illegal is no longer enforcable by any LE agency in the state

If this is true, the the high capacity magazine ban in CA (and potentially everywhere) is unconstitutional. Before you get your hopes up, I can't tell if this is real, and if it IS real, it will most likely be appealed to the ninth circuit, which we all know is liberal la-la-land.

Someone challenged the legality of high cap mags and won in cali, assuming it’s real.

Google it. I just did. So far I found 2 sites which *look* legit, but I'm not 100% certain either. This is big if it's true. I wonder how the appeal will go...

>assuming its real
Who has the time to write an 86 page court document to troll?

What about writing one page and numbering it 86?

Attached: Youreallythinksomeonewoulddothat.jpg (480x360, 25K)

I did. There’s nothing of note on the judges calendar for today.

Attached: B01E3894-9EDD-4AB4-97C3-47A6013AA565.png (1125x2436, 375K)

Big if true

nraila.org/articles/20190329/breaking-federal-court-finds-california-magazine-ban-violates-the-second-amendment

Also no cases by that name.

Attached: 3C27C103-E23E-42ED-9F2E-FCC140FB94EB.png (1125x2436, 366K)

>9th hears it on appeal, reverses
>SCOTUS punts again
Prove me wrong, assholes. You have 5 pro gun votes on the court now so fucking take some gun cases

Attached: 1550127838539.gif (276x244, 2.84M)

You underestimate an autist with nothing better to do

OH. FUCK.

Supreme court declined to hear the last Cali firearms case, I assume this will be the same.

>district court

The 9th is going to overturn it - if not on initial hearing, then on en banc. The 9th always shits on the 2nd when it goes en banc.

SCOTUS will probably not grant cert, and if they do Roberts will cuck out as he always does.

Attached: black-pill1.jpg (800x487, 45K)

Obviously they don't release the opinion the same day they have the hearing. An opinion can take weeks or months to draft.

Obviously, but that will take time. In the meantime, grab your new magazines while you can.

..s-so I can order some m-mags now?