Air superiority thread

Post air to air killing machines. I’ll start with the F15
>104-0 undefeated combat record
>only plane in history to shoot down a satellite
>lost a wing in a midair collision and still landed successfully
>latest gen F15s carry 22 AMRAAMs

Attached: 369DDBBE-8CCA-452C-802A-B0139447D68E.jpg (1200x812, 338K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ76BSassms
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Here is the F15x. It can carry 22 AMRAAMS. Pair this with an F35 out front marking targets for the missle truck to destroy.

Attached: 9FD02185-55D9-4814-AF34-D9E0A3928639.jpg (621x414, 35K)

The Rafale is a great air to air fighter as well. This plane is utilized in many different roles by the French to great effect. Truly a worthy aerial ally to the United States.

Attached: E6EAAC1E-D4A9-41B2-BC68-C3979DF43CB4.jpg (780x520, 37K)

I wonder if there's a naval version

F/A-18. More durable airframe to handle the carrier catapult/wire catching system.

Attached: 0AB4F4EA-24FB-48E3-B541-14DE722E48E5.jpg (713x561, 84K)

Why wouldn't the enemy just shoot down the F 15 with their BVR misssiles

Because the enemies of the USA dont have good BVR missiles that could form a threat to the F-15/F-35 combo. Add the F-22 in the mix and America has 100% air supremacy, 100% of the time.

Attached: 1410159985244_resized.jpg (1991x2520, 1.29M)

This.

>why wouldn’t the enemy just shoot down the F15
>just shoot down the F15
>shoot down the F15
user, I uhh

Because the F35s our front would paint any enemy targets long before they could get a lock onto the F15s🐷

I like the Eurofighter as well, but the Rafale is probably the most distinct design since the F-16. Especially from that angle.

Attached: rafale.jpg (736x491, 165K)

An incredible plane. There’s a really neat documentary on the Rafale on Amazon Prime.

F15 have been shot down 3 times in Iraq tho

Gloss Eagle Best Eagle.

Attached: Boeing Advanced Eagle F15 2040C.png (1910x1078, 1.16M)

Not in air-to-air combat

>lost a wing in a midair collision and still landed successfully
Just fucking stop. Obviously it had wing surface. Fucking dumb mutt liar.

DUDE R PLANES CAN FLY WITH NO WINGZ XDDDDDDDDDD

SO AMERICAN. Fucking kill yourself. Now.

Sure as fuck looks like one wing to me

Attached: f-15 one wing.jpg (736x572, 77K)

Holy fucking salt. Cry harder buttblasted foreigner. This is your daily reminder that the US has the best Air Force on the planet.

Attached: 1FAB1BEF-B002-4087-87E9-5099B1772973.jpg (450x325, 158K)

The seeeeth.
Screencap'd

I think the two on the left ARE photoshopped. The only images that exist are on the ground, and you can't see the shredded bits of wing on the left images.

Of course they are, there were no camera crews around waiting for it to land you retard.

They aren’t photoshopped. The entire landing is on video. m.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ76BSassms

Arab here, they arent. I talked to israeli pilots couple of times and they told me about that case in details. But you have to keep in mind the retards that got that plane fucked up to start with, pilot knew that if he ejected and completely lost the plane his carreer was over and hello prison for him so he took his chance and the madman actually landed it.

It's dramatized. There was no actual film footage of the landing.

The Mirage III is one of the best 1960s fighters

Thoughts one the F-16?

Another great western design.

As dogshit as it is, I like the MiG-29

Attached: mig-29.jpg (1486x990, 84K)

It's a pretty little thing, China is supposed to get the CV version as a hornet equivalent
would love to see the originally planned single-engine design: www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php/topic,41629.msg715518.html#msg715518

Attached: 24305194602_1f9dd45bec_z.jpg (640x480, 62K)

>single-engine
I'm interested.

Attached: migs.jpg (1000x800, 86K)

... so who gets the kill mark then?
Do both jets get 0.5 each?

A russkie F-16, would have been a worthy successor to the MiG-21

Attached: 24305200382_97ce4f3c19_z.jpg (640x480, 51K)

Attached: 7cba3a05.jpg (1023x660, 67K)

Was resurrected as a low-end stealth fighter

Attached: file.php?id=27636.jpg (500x321, 34K)

Yeah... but how are you supposed to engage in sick bantz if you're the only one in the plane? F-14 will always have a place for this critical mission

That looks sick as shit, why'd they scrap that idea?

Attached: thinking.png (112x112, 15K)

shekels, or lack thereof

Of course, those Russians don't know how to finance shit. At least they have a few good lookin' fighters.

The MiG-29 airframe itself is a perfect creation of aerodynamic performance.
It's engines and avionics were severely behind the curve though.

So a Soviet F-16.. The MiG-LFI

Attached: MiG PAK-LFI.jpg (1000x642, 94K)

Attached: air superioty.webm (320x568, 2.95M)

>when your weapons are so shit you have to resort to ramming tactics
Russkies BTFO

>being this retarded

What is it about the F15 that drives russkies and chinks raving mad?

imagine being a chad f-15c pilot being forced to share a ride with a retard in the incel basedseagle

Glorious Amercan bombtruck

Quite possibly the sexiest picture I have saved.

Stop responding to obvious bait.

Imagine coming into this thread to post MIGs.

Attached: 00F9BE51-04BD-461D-A8FA-C5166B3867D7.gif (322x178, 2.56M)

I had to respond for the sake of the newfag lurkers.

Can't use weapons in intl airspace.
Ramming is fine, thou.
Same goes for naval encounters.

F-15 blinked first btw.

best TWO airforces in the world, I might point out.

>F-15 blinked first btw.
There is a difference between chicken out and dodging someone that can not change course fast enough anymore. The russian plane would not have been able to not crash into the F-15, if the F-15 would have ignored him.

The flanker series is a potent air superiority fighter (specifically modernized versions), but I suspect this thread is for celebrating the F-15 and any mention of the flanker will be met with disdain. You know, technically the flanker has a perfect combat record too. What is it? 2-0 or something against a couple of MiG-29s? We never got to see it shine. However, the initial version of the Su-27 would have been outmatched by the F-15 by simple virtue of the fact that it lacked ARH missiles and the ability to engage multiple targets in TWS mode (it had tws, just not the capability to engage more than target). This is a serious shortcoming. Its only advantage over the F-15 was the integrated IRST and the R-27T and ET missiles that gave it a far greater IR range over sidewinders or R-73s.

Attached: 1443255273556.jpg (1200x819, 137K)

>that advanced cope and crying about being bullied for no reason
You are just plain provoking it now.

Nah, I think the F-15 is cool as shit. I just also think there are other fighters that are cool and deserve to be posted. Don't want this thread to be about one plane.

cope harder, McDonnell cuck

Attached: 800px-FA18D_Bengals.jpg (800x464, 51K)

Flankers are good but they are no F15. American planes are just the best. Have been for some time now.

What if the F-15 stayed its course and ignored the Flanker?

Is Russia willing to ram an American fighter jet in international airspace?

This is an air to air thread. The F15 has a perfect record air to air

Depends which variants you are comparing. The new F-15s are better than the new flankers (I think the Su-35 still doesn't have an AESA radar). But there are flankers in service right now with various countries that are superior to the F-15Cs that are still flying.

C L I M B R A T E

Attached: Typhoon Climb Rate.webm (640x480, 869K)

>m-muh air-to-air
keep searching for excuses, bitch

Attached: MEVT5IWHCVG7RCINLU4K25CRAM.jpg (1200x600, 114K)

I’m not sure how you could possibly come to that conclusion. F15C is the most dope F15 of all. If you mean that some of the airframes are 40+ years old, I can tel you that they wear it well

Keep posting inferior aircraft. Why even come into an air to air thread if you can’t handle it?

>anything Lockheed Martin
>inferior to cheap McDonnell garbage
lmao stay irrelevant, loser

Attached: 1534401324_org_jyoh12.jpg (800x450, 20K)

Aircraft, especially when you build a lot of them, are going to be in various states of modernization. A basic F-15C built in the 80s without any upgrades is going to be inferior to an Su-35 as well as some of the latter export Su-30s.

F22 is great. F35 only legitimate use is getting close and marking targets for more capable planes. It’s only useful in stealth mode, so it’s armament is pretty light.

Attached: EF39B0C2-A913-400B-91B4-04025CF110AE.png (980x1147, 1.02M)

F15

> that gaping maw of an intake with the lead landing gear in front
> engine makes a constant ching-chong ting-tong sound dt foreign objects entering

They are photoshopped, HINT: look very closely at the 2 left images, I'll wait

Yo buddy.

Attached: 1548124111450.png (610x699, 381K)

Holy shit, never realized how good that flanker camo is until now

Would probably have the ability to close the main intake with alternate inlets on top of the leading edge root extensions for takeoffs and landings, like the final Fulcrum design

Attached: mig-29-air-intakes.jpg (700x340, 32K)