>Attorney General Xavier Becerra asked a federal judge to delay implementing the ruling while he appeals it. >With the ban lifted, even temporarily, Becerra said in a court filing that "there is evidence that sales have begun already." >If the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstates the ban and a 2016 law outlawing possession, Michel said, buyers could be legally required to give up their newly acquired high-capacity magazines. >However, Becerra warned in his court filing that it would be difficult for the state to remove the magazines, even if the ban is reinstated. >Becerra said in a statement that California leads the nation when it comes to gun safety and refuses to go backward.
If you're in California you better get your magazines now.
Fucking topkek Will all sales be fine even if the shipment is delayed? Or do califags need to have mags in hand before the injunction passes?
I am curious: How do you guys think they learn about this? Have there been news articles? Or do we have spies in our midst?
Ryan Allen
>His office cited a Facebook ad from an out-of-state, online dealer saying it will ship the large-capacity magazines to California. The ad urged buyers to be patient because of an expected increase in orders. >"We are getting prepared to send a whole lot of freedom to our friends in California," reads the post from South Carolina-based Palmetto State Armory. The company did not immediately respond to telephone and email messages. >"The gray area is, what will the status of these magazines acquired during this window be if the stay is reinstated?" Michel said.
Luis Stewart
I mean, it's not exactly a secret that sales are ongoing
>Gun control advocates expected U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez’ ruling striking downa California initiative restricting the size of firearm magazines. But they didn’t anticipate the way he did it. >Supporters of California’s law, which voters approved in 2016 as Proposition 63, were startled by the tone of Benitez’s ruling. >“This opinion is not normal,” said Ari Freilich, California legislative affairs director for the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, which filed a brief in support of the magazine ban. >“This opinion is not normal,”
Dylan Bailey
Outside of San Fagcisco and LGay I’m sure that opinion is quite normal
Cameron Phillips
I like how they uncritically cite some gun control lobby group's attorney as some kind of unbiased source claiming "this is not normal".
>Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts >This opinion is not normal
Brody Foster
If the ban gets reinstated despite the ruling of a federal judge, is there a chance the matter could get escalated to the Supreme Court?
Levi Nguyen
Yeah there's a chance, but who knows how likely it is.
Mason Hughes
>even if it is for monetary reasons The moment they started selling to Cali, they put their 30RD D&H mags on sale for $6. That was not a coincidence. They have said point blank that their mission is to flood the country with cheap AR’s and mags to the point that banning is infeasible. They have proven that they do not price gouge like many places do during panic buys.
Michael Williams
Even though their QC is a shit, they're doing the Lord's work
Camden Lewis
>Freilich worried about what would happened if Benitez’ rhetoric was followed “to its logical conclusion,” asking if the judge also believed restrictions should be lifted on machine guns, tanks and grenade launchers.
When you apply the exact same logic to fag marriage they call it "muh slippery slope".
Wyatt Smith
>QC is shit I’ve got 4 ar’s made from PSA kits with assembled uppers. I’ve never had a problem. If something does slip through, they have great customer service that will make it right anyway.
Kevin Morris
also >Tanks ARE legal to own and operate, as are machine guns (although you can't produce new ones right now), grenade launchers are also legal but considered destructive devices so you'll need to pay the ATF $200 a pop >the judge's rhetoric was that large capacity magazines have a lawful use in self defense, which has fucking nothing to do with tanks you dumb kike So at least three levels of fallacy in one sentence, fucking gungrabbers
Easton Jones
Tanks are illegal if they have a functioning cannon though
Nicholas Anderson
He didn't say which nation.
Luke Walker
Nope, as long is it’s not a fully auto cannon, simply pay the $200 NFA DD tax and then pass go in your recreational AFV.
Lincoln Lopez
I know a lot of us have taken the black pill but I honestly think this is the first crack in the shitty gun grabbing dam, Saint Benitez’s ruling is probably the most concise and indestructible ruling on the 2A in a while, it may just be concerning the magazine ban but the logic can be used against most infringement. All grabbers have to throw against it is “muh status quo” and “muh feelings”. I’m enjoying watching them squirm and seethe tbqh, this is a real black eye to their cause
Henry Murphy
If you have to pay a kike tax to the feds then it's still essentially illegal
Connor Wilson
>"In his opinion, Benitez wrote that “because machine guns, like grenades and shoulder-fired rocket launchers, are not commonly possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, they are specific arms that fall outside the safe harbor of the Second Amendment.” Sit the fuck down, Giffords.
If I were to hypothetically start mailing freedom mags to Calimandoes from out-of-state, could I get in trouble with authorities? Could I get extradited to CA without ever having set foot there? Asking for a friend of my wife's son.
Kevin Perez
Standard capacity is legal now, so you shouldn't have any issues. However when they were unconstitutionally prohibited your state could have extradited you.
Jack Stewart
they raised the price on pmags by $5 ea after the ruling
Andrew Rodriguez
Their sale just ended on them. They’ve literally had that date posted as the end of the sale since it began.
Isaiah Harris
if i didnt have to pay a gay tax stamp to own one you bet your ass id have one
Luke Morgan
That's a big magazine.
Samuel Hernandez
depends on your state laws. in alabama you can't be extradited to another state for a crime unless it's also illegal in alabama.
Henry Perez
As would I. It's just nice to have that grabber argument shut down so they shut up.
Wyatt Long
Dude a tank is like $100000 minimum, and that's like the price for one that doesn't totally work. $200 is peanuts compared to that.
Lincoln Martin
Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts.
Ryan Bailey
You'd probably be better off just killdozing out your car
Elijah Reyes
INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY AND FREEDOM ARE NOT OUTMODED CONCEPTS
fuck, I want to make a glock back plate with this based quote. Perhaps with colonial style lettering
Charles Lopez
The NFA has never once actually granted a tax stamp for a functioning artillery or tank cannon, even though they can and are technically obligated to.
Ergo, you cannot have one even though they're "technically" legal.
Nathaniel Martinez
Yes. Especially once the 9th Circus reverses the district judge on unsound principles because it's full of activist judges trying to legislate from the bench and push an agenda. >the 9th Circuit has been overturned by the SCOTUS more times than all other circuits combined, despite having literally less than half the total rulings of the 5th Circuit
Henry Ramirez
Individual freedom and liberty are not outmoded concepts.
Nicholas Perez
>because machine guns, like grenades and shoulder-fired rocket launchers, are not commonly possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, they are specific arms that fall outside the safe harbor of the Second Amendment. I hate this bullshit logic. The only reason machine guns aren't commonly possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes is because Hughes made it impossible for them to be commonly possessed by law-abiding citizens.
