Tell me why I shouldn't defend my property with one.
Flamethrowers
Other urls found in this thread:
shop.tacticalshit.com
krita.org
twitter.com
the fags at geneva will get angery.
It greatly increases the chance that you might defend your property and also go full Notre Dame on it. Of course I'm assuming you don't live in a concrete/steel bunker.
Since when did Satan care about such things?
You're property will probably be fucked just like the person you use it against
>Tell me why I shouldn't defend my property with one.
when cops arrest you, the jury will convict you of torture and murder.
>torture
How so when they're free to leave?
I got nothing for you OP.
Go buy one and give /k a review
The bank and niggers cant steal my property if theres nothing to steal
1. Prison
2. Lighting your property on fire
But the geneva convention permits the use of flamethrowers satan
against military targets yes, so long as civilians aren't involved in some manner.
But niggers aren't people and neither are banks.
You'll go to jail for six thousand years. Your defense isn't even relevant, a judge will get an earth shattering hate-boner.
:o Satan leveled up
Free to leave but still covered in burning fuel, lol. Point is that any court would see it as cruel and excessive.
That doesn't seem like a very good flamethrower, more like a plant burning toy
You could probably build your own better one based on military designs.
It doesn't have the range of a howitzer
There's an argument to be made for buying hundreds of acres, placing cameras on the perimeter, and shelling unaware hikers with artillery in retaliation for trespassing.
i hope the wind isnt blowing and sets your house on fire
because if you use unleaded fuel it can overpenetrate and kill your neighbors.
Just imaging waking up to the smell of burnt nigger in the morning for a month
>those trips
>Niggers aren't people and neither are banks
SO SAYETH THE LORD
build a man a fire and you keep him warm for the night
set a man on fire and you keep him warm for the rest of his life
>2019
>not werfing flammen
anyone have the webm of a guy lighting a cigarette with a flamethrower and then spraying it?
was probably a homemade one
i want my final moments to be this /comfy/
>I'm assuming you don't live in a concrete/steel bunker.
Ask the Japanese how well that works against a flamethrower.
>bunker of concrete and steel
literally what the flamethrower is best at assaulting you stupid fucking zoomer shithead
the smoke and burning napalm reduces your options to either stay inside and burn and inhale smoke or go outside and get shot
You will be more dangerous for your own property than everyone else.
really?
because youre 12 and a larping faggot
risk of fire?
It doesn't matter what the judge thinks if the jury thinks you didn't do anything wrong
PROTIP: live in Texas
Its as if God and the Devil himself are having a debate.
Is this a holy thread?
How do yo make an image like this???
There’s software for it.
You choose the image you want to make and the background pics.
Only downside is you have to collect every picture yourself, unless you manage to scrape a booru.
Name of the software??
Holy fug
based satan spitting on simp war ''''''''''crimes'''''''''''
Holy shit are you literally retarded? Yes if the OP did live in a concrete and steel bunker then absolutely he could use a flamethrower to defend it without fear of burning his own house down. I said I assume he DOES NOT live in a concrete and steel bunker and thus SHOULD NOT use a flamethrower to defend it because he will burn his own fucking house down you absolute illiterate mongoloid.
I always thought that there was just some dedicated weeb somewhere on sentinel island doing nothing but creating that kind of image.
Depends what you mean by your property
If it were some isolated area surrounded by a lack of flammables, then fine go ahead
if you are in any remotely built up area with things like wooden structures, dry plants or other flammables i wouldn't for one very big reason: collateral damage
i realise some of you fellows are anarcho-sociopaths who don't care at all, but i wouldn't want other bystanders to lose their property or to suffocate (maybye worse) because i don't know the definition of overkill
> i don't know the definition of overkill
Probably cause that word doesnt exist ya dingus
Are you currently in a state of war with thives and no-good vagrants, satan?
Fire really doesn't care if you accidentally set your house alight.
Based and Pratchettpilled
Just get a muzzle brake and some cheap M193 ammo, you’ll get the occasional super bright flash from the unburnt powder.
We F:NV boomers now?
You will not have a property afterwards.
Cause it's your property.
The last thing you need is a flaming nigger running around while coco butter splatters off of it like bacon grease.
>implying I'm not gonna be using direct fire
What, like mounting a howitzer in your home aimed directly at your front door?
Nah mate, gotta have that all round security
Fixed up the garden
Try saying that when you’re on fire
Download Krita.
Free krita.org
>live in a concrete/steel bunker
In which case you would suffocate to death as the flames succ all the oxygen out of your home.
The wind blows the other direction and you will be mighty crispy
if you are fine that anything on your property will be burning down I suppose its good
Don’t aim low you could start a fire but otherwise go for it.
Holy shit satan with the truth
FIRE HOT OUCHIE BURNING
Checkeded