First let me explain that I absolutely do believe we have the right to bear arms for hunting and target shooting. That being said, there is simply no reason for a mere civilian to own an assault rifle. It is a weapon literally meant to "assault" an enemy position in times of war. Given that rifles only kill a few hundred people a year in the US, the loss of these guns will be minimal because they are simply not used for self defense. They are used for slaughtering large numbers of civilians in prolific mass shootings. No one is hunting deer with an AR-15. One shot from it and you'd blow the damn thing into pieces, it ruins the meat.
All that being said, why are we continuing to allow these weapons of mass destruction in our society? Let's discuss this issue and find a solution we can all agree on.
>I absolutely do believe we have the right to bear arms for hunting and target shooting. That being said, there is simply no reason for a mere civilian to own an assault rifle. Low effort.
Angel Carter
>one shot would blow the damn thing into pieces low-tier bait
Why the fuck is Jow Forums inundated with absolute shit grade threads lately?
Eli Hall
>This bait will get 300 replies
Aiden Reed
>i support the 2nd amendment, but ..
Get some new material, lefty.
James Carter
This is bait
Eli King
Jow Forums has been like that too. The average thread is meh and the bait/shitpost quality is atrocious. Was the sight in the news a bit ago, or is this reddit raiding?
Brody Howard
Confiscating guns from law-abiding citizens doesn't restrict criminals from possessing the same weapons.
Benjamin Morris
>First let me explain that I absolutely do believe stopped reading
SHALL
Daniel Miller
>ar-15 >weapon of war kill yourself gun grabbing nigger
I love how people actually quote statistics like that though, as if mass shootings are even a fraction of a percentage of deaths when compared to chronic diseases.
Ryan Davis
>right to bear arms >for hunting and target shooting That's not what "bear arms" means
