>aesthetically beautiful
>unimpressive performance/impractical
What's her name, Jow Forums?
>aesthetically beautiful
>unimpressive performance/impractical
What's her name, Jow Forums?
Other urls found in this thread:
mirror.co.uk
twitter.com
Every member of the Ak family
I have many problems with VTOL aircraft mostly just that their impractical for most uses, those were advertise to be able to lift a lot but in reality can't.
But they shouldn't be used for troop deployment as your wasting lifters that could be better used on moving heavy support to the field.
That's what helicopters are for.
These days, 1911 or c96. More the impractical part.
Ur a faget.
It's got air con. V-22 is a godsend.
Nothing wrong with the CV-22. It does what its supposed to.
It’s also worth noting that, despite the memes, it has one of the lowest crash rates of any rotary wing aircraft in service.
Yeah, ist just overall good. Could be a bit cheaper tho I guess, but you get what you pay for.
walther wa-2000
Muh-REEN mauler
>more test pilot deaths than any other military plane
>more time spent on development than any other military plane
>more accidental fatalities then any other military plane
>>more test pilot deaths than any other military plane
Not correct
>>more time spent on development than any other military plane
Not correct
>>more accidental fatalities then any other military plane
Nog correct
NH-90
Any bullpup
More a case of personal preference really.
It's a bird it's a plane, no it's a huge waste of money
I personally prefer being able to fight around corners to my right without spraying brass into my cheek.
Thunderscreech. I still think it would make a fucking awesome uav weapon, though. Just give it a fuck huge fuel tank and run it around enemy positions all night long.
Not all bulpups eject to the right. And this really isnt a huge issue anyway, there are a bunch of ways to just deflect the brass if its a huge issue for your combat capability.
Retard
Heavy girl gets fat-shamed as an aardvark.
my wife.
I thought they fixed the issues with it
How is an AK impractical? It fires when you need to fire it while being cheap to manufacture.
all the good it does that oil rig crew
mirror.co.uk
>mirror.co.uk
NH90 being a shite helo non-withstanding, that crash was not a NH90
the akm is the epitome of practicality
This. For beeing a 1940s design is excellent, especially considering its still the wolds most common assault rifle.
AK-47 is great and saw good service in Nam' as a GI service rifle.
I mean she was a maintenance hog, but definitely not a slouch performance wise.
Big brain post right there
based boomer post
Flamethrowers mounted on vehicles or carried on foot
Tankettes. Almost any sort of tank, assault gun, or tank destroy since the rise of the MBT, really.
Battle rifles
M3 Carbine.
SVD
>Hating flamethrowers
Fag
>Tankettes/assault guns
Most of those haven't even been produced since like the fuckin 80s, it's mostly wheeled meme vehicles with auto or reconfigured tank cannons. With the exception of that strv piece of shit that was designed specifically to kill abrams or whatever
>Battle rifles
I mean
I guess I agree
But fuck you anyway
Literally every Russian aircraft ever
Tanks too
Anyone have the photograph of the guy drinking pibb with a crashed V 22 in the background
She was just born at the wrong time, ok?
Pic related?
>The crayon box
VTOL
>Air Mobile Operations: Good
>Air Assault Operations: Big oof
Overpriced Helocopter
TRIPS BE PRAISED!!! HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH!!
>aesthetically beautiful
>unimpressive performance/impractical
Fuck, it's me
F2000
n-not my helifu
>name
no idea, can't read moon runes
>49 replies
>no deagle