M1A Bully Thread

>shoots less accurately than a G3

yup, muh m1a can reach your nose at 1000 yards,muh navy seal snipers use it all the time

>jams because of open receiver

The open receiver actually makes it easier to do repairs..

>cost at least 1400 big boy bux, yet you can get a norinco, FAL, or g3 for less than a 1 grand and performs better in most cases.

Wuda ya poor fag or sumptin? (yet can't afford a Scar or Bren)
Why are M1A owners the gayest of all battle rifle owners?

Attached: ma9102_1200x3061.png (370x370, 28K)

you cant buy a norinco in the US, and only buy one if you want your bolt to explode within 2k rounds

Where did the bad M14 man touch you, OP?

Attached: du nod lewd rifle.jpg (1438x960, 84K)

oh boy this thread again

Attached: 1554402570990.png (986x797, 869K)

>being so assblasted that a rifle exists that you make multiple threads about it
Wow.

That said, post your M1a/M305/M14 clones.
I want a 6.5 creedmoor one for kicks and less kick/ what if we adopted .276, then shortened that .276 like what we did with .30-06 since SAI doesn't do 7mm-08 or .243 anymore.

6.5>.308

This is surely a topic we need a daily new thread about. Also, OP has never sucked a cock.

they are always marked down to $1200

in cost

Baste and Rhodesian babyshit green camo pilled.

ballistics too.

I disagree.

Attached: boomer.jpg (550x550, 32K)

Try reloading brass after it's been mangled by a G3.

FALs are for neckbeard closet fascists who lack the courage to publicly wear short-shorts and ptrs/c308s are for poorfags who want a gun they can't afford to shoot so they can make fun of other poorfags that don't shoot their ars for not shooting smaller bullets.

>supplying the brass jew.

I'm quite fine with this.

Attached: 1538044056328.png (332x342, 30K)

hi...

...M14 is larping outdated garbage.

Attached: 1539010671791.png (500x500, 221K)

You forgot
>cast reciever
lmao, BELOW mil spec. This is indefensible.

>M1A's relevant

Attached: 1546243601414.png (645x729, 32K)

these are still fine rifles.....and a fine operating system, you think the U.S .mil would accept a subpar service rifle? Hell no...these can be very precise and are reliable.

Go ahead and buy that glock or AR15, if you want craftsmanship and a piece of art that doubles as a instrument of death, get his M14, otherwise stick with the tactifool AR, your shots are spray and pray and mine are well aimed kid.

Dave

>you think the U.S .mil would accept a subpar service rifle?

Attached: 1546584004849.jpg (480x375, 15K)

>calling that poster retarded
Dave knows his shit, he's been here for years. He gave me good tips on what type of oil to use on my m1a walnut stuck.

Attached: 1555368463895.jpg (640x640, 40K)

Dave, you are a faggot Im afraid.

How are we brother? Just remember Connie, real magic!

Dave

Attached: RLO.jpg (510x464, 255K)

The thing is I don't actually know if your arguing for or against the M1A.

Attached: Snapchat-353518964.jpg (2000x3912, 2.36M)

OP has indeed sucked much cock

This is it, the ultimate boomer post

>spray and pray AR15

I don't know if you're stupid or just trolling. Also just because it's over engineered doesn't make it better. It makes it overengineered. The AR10 does the same with less malfunctions and with more accuracy.

You M1A weebs are delusional as fuck.

Attached: 1507624581721.jpg (1024x663, 54K)