Revolution

The final pill

Unlike the Nazis, you shouldn't kill people because they hold a different ideology

>Jow Forumsacks must be physically removed
>you shouldn't kill people because they hold a different ideology
???????¿?

This is the part where he calls you a lolbertarian pussy and tells you that you'll never win because you're too disorganized and complacent.

nice strawman. no, i don't want any of those things. i want capitalism and only niggers purged.

Deported to Germany for violating the NAP.

Tell me exactly what you think is bad enough here that justifies a revolution.

When we have nothing to lose. Then people will take up arms.

The average person has too much to lose. I know if I throw it all away nothing will change. In the end I'll just be vilified and used as a justification for more oppression.

We live in an era of plenty. Our poorest live better than the rich of old. Our middle class are practically the wealthy of the rest of the world. Until that dynamic changes the numbers to resist wont fulminate.

Democracy has failed us though. Our Founders would never implement it if they knew this was the result. The romanticized view of the Founders is based not on what they actually stood for - which is creating a liberty oriented ethnostate - but modernist values of "equality" and "fairness". Even liberals are abandoning the facade that they are within the scope of the Founders' vision and are just throwing the whole thing out because even they realize that the Founders didn't intend any of this to apply to non-whites.

Actual values of the Revolution:

>Use non-violence until it is clear you can't win that way
>Criticize your oppressors even if it means death
>Win at all costs
>Lie to recruit more people to your cause
>Torture those who are loyal to the enemy openly
>Recruit from the ranks of the poor, lonely, and scared
>Exclude as many people from the country as possible while maintaining a net positive growth rate that shares a stock with your domestic population
>Exclude people you disagree with from participating in government
>Kill people that disagree with you

The alt-right is the closes thing to the Founders today. Everybody who goes around talking about constitutionality applying to niggers is a traitor to our Founders and their people.

>The alt-right is the closes thing to the Founders today.

lmao

Your next line is going to be something to the tune of "self-government is unnatural; the strong and wise must be able to lead the weak and stupid (everyone but you) as they see fit without interference."

Spot on. But the left and anti white crowd keep eroding away at our stability and the very support for our families and our people. When they've attacked us too much, then it's war.

America is NOT a Democracy. The founding fathers were against pure Democracy.

>Kill people that disagree with you
Jefferson and Adama would have never killed each other despite the massive contrast in their beliefs

You sound like an FBI agent, but if I were to revolt it would be over something life changing i.e taxes so high I can't buy essentials, human rights getting taken away. Live may not be as free as I want but it's not terrible enough to try and change everything yet.

I don't understand this mentality seeing as we are living in one of the most prosperous times in world history. I mean yea there is some shitty stuff going on but at least you don't have to worry about dying from polio or getting drafted to go to war in nam and come back just to kill yourself.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790

"The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free White persons of good character. It thus excluded Native Americans, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians, although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in certain states. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, stating that such children "shall be considered as natural born citizens," the only US statute ever to use the term. It specified that the right of citizenship did "not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States."[1][2][3]"

You are historically illiterate.

No, the rabbit hole will be deeper than that.

Republican (classical definition) values ultimately leads to democracy because people will always want to cater to non-voters by promising them the right to vote to further enfranchise their side. The Democrats are doing this right now with felons and non-citizen non-whites. In short, had the Founders foreseen a pure democracy being born from their republic they would have either given the judicial branch more power or made amendments unconstitutional or not even done a republic to begin with.

So the situation we're in right now is fine for you? Are you enjoying the endless Cold Race War we've been in since the LA Riots? Is the monolithic non-white vote constantly attacking all rights and structure what the Founders intended?

>George Washington wanted every man to be free and vote and take away his descendant's right to own guns and speak freely and decatouple the murder rate!

The revolution WAS killing people they disagreed with, they actively tortured and publicly executed editors of Crown sympathetic publications.

Attached: D15OhMVWwAETnxS.jpg (615x428, 55K)

Incoming janny deleting this thread because civnats are getting BTFO yet again.

Attached: 1460937125822.gif (640x480, 1001K)

This. The silent majority needs to wake up. Extremists should be converted when possible. For the ones who want a fight though...
They'll be quite outnumbered. Extremism is the bane of humanity.

Attached: all the work.png (500x856, 191K)

ACCELERATE

Attached: 1552693151467.jpg (1280x768, 87K)

This. The jannies and mods on this board are all Punisher skull stickered, lifted F150 owners that say things like

>We all bleed red white and blue
>Tejanos are keeping Texas red
>Natural conservatives
>Assimilation works
>Racism is wrong
>THIN BLUE LINE (but I'll TOTALLY kill cops during a RFPO)
>Terrorism is wrong, even if it is for gun rights
>My state will just secede if the federal government gets too big
>1776 WILL HAPPEN AGAIN!

Attached: 1552623817861.png (2257x1440, 3.62M)

Attached: Stop it.jpg (530x507, 48K)

Something wrong friend?

Attached: ss.png (377x172, 51K)

Why? Just go back on Facebook and share Turning Point USA memes.

Attached: just_in_case_im_accused_of_samefagging.png (358x169, 47K)

(YOU)MIND

Attached: what.png (642x917, 270K)

It's what the founders did to the British. Also the USA was founded as a white ethnostate.

Based.

Do any of the civnats in this thread have a response to the Naturalization Act of 1790? Was the first congress, "the same Congress who enacted the Bill of Rights, including members who had participated in the Constitutional Convention" just a bunch of evil Jow Forums time travelers?

Or is it more likely that the country was originally established as a White ethnostate?

What sucks about context of the era is that it was so common sense at the time that the country should be exclusively white that they didn't feel they had to really outline it in any meaningful way.

>Lie to recruit more people to your cause
Herein lies the core of the problem with Jow Forumsacks. The statist is much like a Muslim. In small numbers, he will lie and align himself with whatever group benefits him most at that moment while proclaiming to believe in everything that you do while keeping his true intentions hidden. Once the infiltration has achieved critical mass and it's time to enact forceful reforms, you will find that those who actually share your ideals of small government, free market capitalism, and individual rights are in fact the minority. The snakes lying coiled at your feet, hidden in the grass, will rise and strike down those who disagree with the "real" new order.

See
For further demonstration of this principal. Notice how he goes from making the correct distinction between a true Democracy and a Republic to telling us that what the Founders wanted was not actually what they put into practice, but rather something else. Something vague that he gives no real details on. You may not know what he really means, but he does. And so do the rest of them.

>Calls you out for being the bootlicking gungrabber in disguise that you are
>Falls back on calling me a niggerlover

The founders were at war with the British. To say the USA was founded as a white ethostate is bad history. There were States who had black citizens

Acts of Congress are not infallible. The founders themselves are also not infallible. To revere all they did is a cult mentality.

What are you even saying? You said in >Insists that nobody except himself and those like him are fit to vote

I'm pointing out that the founders intended the country as a white ethnostate. Because they did.

If you want to schizopost about how everyone who isn't you is secretly a commienaziliberalgrabber, that's up to you. But if you want to talk about how the founders intended everyone in this country to be able to become a citizen and vote, you're historically wrong.

>To say the USA was founded as a white ethostate is bad history. There were States who had black citizens
Exceptions to the rule does not disprove the rule. The naturalization act clearly states the requirement for national citizenship was to be a "free White persons of good character".

>Acts of Congress are not infallible. The founders themselves are also not infallible. To revere all they did is a cult mentality.

Now you're getting into a discussion of history versus how the country OUGHT to be. If we're going down that route that's a completely different discussion.

I agree that acts of congress are not infallible. That's why we should repeal the Hart-Celler Act.

I am the person you are replying to first and second.

1) Lying is not a problem if you win. Winning is more important than the ethics of telling the truth to your followers. Most people are incapable of functioning in a larger society and don't deserve the respect of being treated to the truth if it means they will falter behind the cause.

None of the values you listed in that post actually are achievable with a sizable group of non-whites within the country, they simply don't care about them. Therefore tricking neocons into funding a race war and slow boil terrorism is the only way to achieve your limited government, individual rights, libertarian paradise.

2) I wasn't lying in that post, see 3) Might as well address this too as I have a take for it. Guns don't matter if you're not going to use them. They aren't cool toys or one of the best home security systems, they're the mos effective form of political agency on earth. If you aren't going to use them towards that end you are a huge coward and are weak. They can take the guns, who cares? You won't do anything. In fact, when the pro-white terrorists start popping up you'll be the first to condemn them while you guns rust in PVC pipes in your backyard and your daughter gets assaulted at her elementary school.

Gun grabber, not a gun grabber. Doesn't matter. What matters is the intent behind it and you're obsessed with the actual physical guns. They've disarmed you a long time ago because you won't do anything to the people causing the problem.

Attached: 1553490389489.gif (661x800, 190K)

>Exceptions to the rule does not disprove the rule.
The Naturalization Act was passed in 1790
The country had already been founded. The only thing that had recently been founded was the federal government. The States pre-exist the federal government and certain states had black citizens

>None of the values you listed in that post actually are achievable with a sizable group of non-whites within the country, they simply don't care about them. Therefore tricking neocons into funding a race war and slow boil terrorism is the only way to achieve your limited government, individual rights, libertarian paradise.

You treat your own words to be the absolute truth of god. You either do this intentionally to further mislead people fpr your own gain, or you do it unintentionally like a sick prophet

>Guns don't matter
At least you finally admit it.

>Like communists, they only care about guns for the purpose of fighting an imaginary race war against the ZOG.

Go make some headlines if you're such a hardcore defender of the white race.

You can meme about civnats all you like, and to some extent I agree with you when it comes to race, but your end goal and mine are in no way compatible.

I'm this guy
I personally still believe the country can still be fixed peacefully through spreading the message. I get why Brenton Tarrantino did what he did, but I don't advocate following his path. I'm still not convinced of accelerationism like he promotes in his manifesto, I think the system is stable enough and has enough inertia that armed action is not right at this time. Our message is popular, it's just heavily censored.

If it gets worse, or we get beyond the point where things can be fixed peacefully, cowabunga it is then.

If we're going to play that game, this country was not founded with free speech and gun rights as a founding principle because the bill of rights was enacted in 1791

Which states are you referring to that had black citizens? It surely was tiny percentage of a percentage. Again, an exception to the general rule.

His points can be backed up with empirical evidence. You can look up attitudes towards guns and free speech by race and easily read about it.

If you don't have guns loaded and chambered ready for the event of tyranny knocking at your door you're doing it wrong

Can you disprove my point or do you just like saying stuff that sounds cool?

This isn't the comment section on your local news station's facebook. You have to back that up senpai. I can. Blacks vote Democrat 90%, Hispanics 70%, yeah sure gun control is pretty liked among all demographics but it's such low priority for them. They don't care because they'll just get them illegally or actually don't care about guns and just like the idea they /could/ get one.

>>Guns don't matter
>At least you finally admit it.

And? Did you just read that part, turn your brain off, then start your reply? They don't matter because none of you people will use them and never intend to. Realistically we can do our thing without owning guns legally. We can make any weapon we want, you can't have fun range toys if you don't own range toys legally.

In response to the response to the other guy: we are, monthly in fact. There's no sense in throwing our lives into jail right now. Slow boil over a decade should do fine. Don't worry, the people you think are on your side will make this country so bad that NOT acting will be worse than actually kicking shit off.

Post timestamped guns, tough guy

Extremism is for brainlets who can't handle reality.
casual racism is board Jow Forumsulture, whatever.
However, you faggots need to fuck off back into your containment board. We treat you like you treat Jews for a reason.

Attached: Bait.png (1126x1900, 3.3M)

Attached: 1444706865002.png (640x480, 14K)

Imagine thinking you're this smart lol

This is no longer a battle of wits, it is now a battle of memes.

Attached: Elementistic.png (512x508, 295K)

This

Okay, keep being a fag. Enjoy getting beaten by cops for holding the extremist views of individual rights.

Attached: 1553653963011.jpg (385x1024, 112K)

>this country was not founded with free speech and gun rights as a founding principle because the bill of rights was enacted in 1791
False
the revolutionaries cited the 'ancient constitution' as a justification to their grievances. However, even to this day, the British do not have a written, single constitution. So along with legal precedent, the revolutionaries relied upon the principles of the enlightenment which include freedom of speech.

>Which states are you referring to that had black citizens?
All I need to do is post one State

>Again, an exception to the general rule.
It's amazing how you speak in absolutes, but when faced with evidence that contradict your beliefs, you suddenly switch to generalizations.

>empirical evidence
Generalizations are not empirical

>Democrat 90%, Hispanics 70%
This is the entirely the fault of the Democrat party. They are tyrants who using an ignorant people to further their own gain. However as you've said, it is not time for violence.

Never said that I was smart. But I know a sperg when I see one.

Because of lemmings.

Attached: 206952.png (1203x6000, 2.35M)

>the revolutionaries cited the 'ancient constitution' as a justification to their grievances. However, even to this day, the British do not have a written, single constitution. So along with legal precedent, the revolutionaries relied upon the principles of the enlightenment which include freedom of speech.

And we can tell that they thought this because they wrote it all down. Like they wrote down in the first definition of becoming a naturalized citizen that you had to be white.

Unless you're saying that for some reason the idea behind the Naturalization act appeared from a vacuum and is for some reason completely separate from all of the other thoughts within the revolutionaries heads?

>All I need to do is post one state
Do, go on, please

>It's amazing how you speak in absolutes, but when faced with evidence that contradict your beliefs, you suddenly switch to generalizations.
Non-autistic people can infer that when someone says a statement like "Women are shorter than men", they mean that "most women are shorter than men" instead of responding with "nuh-uh I've seen a 6'5" woman before, not ALL women are shorter than men." It's the way regular people speak.
>empirical evidence
when the empirical evidence points to a generalization, yes, they are.
people-press.org/2017/06/22/public-views-about-guns/#race
>muh democrats are brainwashing muh natural conservatives
ok retard

Attached: electionracesex.png (1804x2438, 860K)

Historical revisionist/Jew detected

>implying the nazis killed people only for differing ideology, not resisting their will or features deemed inferior in general
>implying the nazis actually systematically killed Jews
Lmao public school education, folks. I bet you think the civil war was about slaves too.

gr8 b8 m8

Attached: My sides.gif (400x398, 1.87M)

The revolutionaries were alcoholic illiterate drunks led by philosopher lawyers. I see now why you got asshurt about my “lying” comment. You actually look up to the average revolutionary.

I hope one day you realize the error of your ways at the end of a black gang’s gun as they loot your house during a government approved “gun safety check”.

This lol

This guy actually thinks he’s in the right and would rather turn the country to shit just so he can be right.

>Let’s just wait and see if all these people openly calling for our genocide ACTUALLY want to do it.

He really needs to fucking off himself and stop gatekeeping our potential soldiers.

Well said Rabbi.

>stop gatekeeping our fucking soldiers

Fuck off you bootlicking faggot. I am no man's monkey.

I honestly think it will be over guns. Before with gun laws, confiscation was never a thing. Now, confiscation without grandfather clauses are getting written at the state level turning once law abiding citizens into felons. Add in the databases of every CCW holder, every background check that you know the state is keeping in a database... It all boils down to the tyranny of the masses passing unconstitutional laws and our courts too pozzed to strike them down. I think this will happen within the next 20 years or so. You'll see some civil wars at the state level. Maybe at the regional level. What this country needs is a divorce from each other. Don't give up your guns. Never give up your guns. They are the great force equalizer. Time and Time again we see local 3rd world insurgencies ass ram 1st world armies.

Do you not know what gatekeeping means? I was accusing him of preventing potential radicals from hearing a call to action by promoting the idea that non-whites can even share the same values as us.

The only call to action I can hear is one to detonate 20lbs of tannerite at your next meet as you're all lined up to take a group photo. Your brand of cancer will do nothing but put your own people back under the yoke of tyranny in the name of the common good. Always kill a traitor before your enemy.

Your civnat buddy is too autistic to understand you’re on the same side.

>civnat
>the same side

t. Watched Starship Troopers and thought "I'd really like to live in a society like that."

I don’t even know what you’re saying anymore.

I'm tired of these faggot Jow Forums threads when are we gonna take up arms and have a Jow Forums revolution?

>L1 wedge fracture means I can't do military service for training and fitness
>No real mobility issues, just a slight ache if I'm in the same upright losition for ages without moving
>Running and walking have been fine with a backpack on
How do I get fit for the boogaloo? How do 0311 vets manage with multiple fractures and fucked knees? I got off relatively lightly but it still gets me down as I'm only 21 and fucking up in the gym was a stupid and easily avoidable mistake

gee, i wonder who could be behind this post

>human rights getting taken away.
>getting taken away.
>getting taken
>getting
they already *got" taken away, long ago
really not many left to us at this point. a man can barely function in this society anymore. we're basically worker-slave-monkeys in a cage
this is why there are so many social problems

Thanks shlomo. I don't know what I would have thought had you not told me what to think.

Attached: 1556052772152m.jpg (1024x959, 125K)

Nigger if you think Jews are the one and only class of rich people screwing us over you're even dumber than I thought you were.

>Extremism is for brainlets who can't handle reality.
Tolerance and apathy are traits of a dying society.

Attached: 1555381884870.jpg (492x512, 35K)

I don't see other races using their wealth to promote disarming the populace, racemixing, dumping money into isreal, toxic third wave feminism, open boarders etc.
Make a counter argument you dumb nigger.

Attached: 1555171212892m.jpg (1024x728, 75K)