In a purely hypothetical yet realistic situation, how would a rebel/militiaman, or anybody with the capabilities of an ordinary person defend themselves against a drone in the event they were being hunted by them?
They fly high enough to where they can't be seen, they can launch strikes from miles away, and you'll never see it coming. What tools or strategies could you use to avoid/escape these? Or even take one down? This is all hypothetical of course, nor would any of us be in a situation under these circumstances.
>In a purely hypothetical yet realistic situation, how would a rebel/militiaman, or anybody with the capabilities of an ordinary person defend themselves against a drone in the event they were being hunted by them? Find out where the people operating them are, and kill them.
Wyatt Young
You don't. These drones completely shut down Jow Forums's fantasy of civil war against the government. The only defense is to jam them, and civilians have no capability of the level of tech needed to jam one of these. They are literally made to not be jammed
Jeremiah Flores
You would be avoiding them more than anything
Michael Bennett
See Also, we had drones in Iraq and Afghanistan, and they didn't shut down the rebellions there or help us win.
Alexander Walker
By parking your fat ass in the vicinity of something they dare not fire missiles at.
now that we are talking about civil war 2: electric boogaloo, how would a neutral person in the conflict notify the drones that they arent supposed to be blown up? would walking around with a white flag on your bag work? but dont they see in heat?
Jonathan Gomez
>They are literally made to not be jammed It’s a fucking radio frequency, you’re not trying to hijack one. Literally just shitpost radio waves towards the drone to drown out its own radio waves.
Anthony Adams
Not him but, what device would a civilian use to do that though? Like in particular? And could it be ordered say, on Amazon?
Josiah Flores
Its pretty much been said, find and kill the operator or operate in places they can't bomb without killing a bunch of civilians and turn the population against them. Alternatively, get an airplane and take pot shots at it with a nugget.
Adam Cooper
Nigger, two sources >Half the US military that would instantly defect in the event of a civil war >Foreign aid (where do you think the sand people got stingers from to shoot down Hinds?)
With one of these. Russians have been fucking with this shit over Syrian skies for years and Ameriniggers got immensely butthurt over it. Iranians also used one of these to bring a bunch of them down (including a top-secret Sentinel drone)
Lmao, the American military really is a paper tiger. The first time they go against a near-peer adversary and they have to cry out in pain to keep from getting their shit pushed in.
In any real conflict, the US would have a lot more trouble keeping air superiority and using their toys effectively. It's like they haven't even considered that this was a possibility, as if no country could touch their magical machines. America is in for a surprise.
Bentley Williams
I doubt it's possible. I don't know the specifics but it's likely they use frequency hopping to avoid jamming.
Mason Lee
See and
Eli James
Except what Iran did was spoof GPS, making it land somewhere other than the preprogrammed 'home'
Colton Mitchell
Either way, American drones aren't invincible and easily challenged.
Jackson Collins
Now that we agree on. It's only a matter of finding out what equipment the sand niggers used
Sebastian Green
>In a purely hypothetical yet realistic situation, how would a rebel/militiaman, or anybody with the capabilities of an ordinary person defend themselves against a drone in the event they were being hunted by them? by building one of these:
Hunt the drone bases. Base security is a bitch when you can stuff a mortar in a white van and hit it from 5 miles away.
Luis Lewis
The US military's GPS is encrypted and can't be spoofed (yet), only jammed. It's the civilian that's unencrypted and can be spoofed
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_Block_IIIA#Military_(M-code) >A major component of the modernization process, a new military signal called M-code was designed to further improve the anti-jamming and secure access of the military GPS signals. The M-code is transmitted in the same L1 and L2 frequencies already in use by the previous military code, the P(Y) code.
Easton Gonzalez
>filename
Josiah Robinson
Crash a 747 into the building containing the operator
Ryan Scott
Or attack their ground based infrastructure.
Christopher King
>A fortified base 100km away? And what are you going to do, use your leet hacker skills to find and hack the fuel trucks? That depends on the terrain, nature of the conflict, equipment I have on hand, who the operator of the aircraft is, what my ultimate objective is.
William Walker
No. You use this fabulous invention called a “phone” to contact your buddy who contacts his buddy who gives you the home addresses of the pilots and crew, then you go there in the middle of the night and slit their throats and rape thier family to death.
Hypothetically.
Juan Ward
>A fortified base 100km away? You rape and kill the drone operator's family. >And what are you going to do, use your leet hacker skills to find and hack the fuel trucks? You don't hack fuel trucks you blow them up.
Landon Ortiz
>A fortified base 100km away? And what are you going to do, use your leet hacker skills to find and hack the fuel trucks? First, stateside bases aren't very fortified, and are usually surrounded by neighborhoods full of businesses and residences. They're also resupplied by trucks that have to roll through those neighborhoods and are extremely easy to destroy along the way. Second, no hacking will be required to blow shit up on the base - cheap mortars fired from a parking lot or even off the back of a truck will do. What are they going to do to retaliate - call in an airstrike on the neighborhood next to the base where half their families live? No, you won't destroy everything on the base like that, but it'll be enough to disrupt operations and make it hard for them to get a lot done.
In such a scenario, there is little you can do, you can attack the base from where the drones are being operated, but such compounds would most likely be heavily fortified, artillery and armored vehicles would help in such an assault, but the other solution, is SAMs which again are hard to obtain. However, SAMS would be easier to get, as raiding enemy supply lines is easier than attacking their base
Michael Parker
Raping families isn't a very good war tactic, it cements the opposition as a bunch of mutt/brutes
Henry Allen
The same way you avoid getting airstriked by normal planes. Hide among civilians.
>what are the mechanics that keep the drones operating >what are the pilots that fly them >what is threeway crew that arms them >what is the maintenance that keeps the tech operating them running >What is any one of these links not being down for killing their own countrymen. You didn't even try using your brain, leftist eurotrash. >What is Russia publicly acknowledging they would IMMEDIATELY back a US splinter faction and flooding the country with jamming devices, MANPADS, and 'instructors'.
Some would defect but most will either refuse to carry out actions against civilians or desert entirely. The few boot licking spergs that remain will end up making themselves look so bad to the point of millions of rioters taking to the streets of dc and other major cities all across the country.
