Thin versus wide H&K MP5 fore end?

Thin versus wide H&K MP5 fore end?

Attached: DC52F2CA-FF02-4394-8FDD-40C41D0DFF83.jpg (800x600, 135K)

Wide is far more aesthetic

Surefire is the only answer

i think the opposite. but wide is better on 33 and 91

Wideboi all the way,
unless you have one of the straight mags,
then the slim fore-end is acceptable.

Attached: hFVAABZ.jpg (5184x3456, 3.72M)

this for certain

Porque no los dos

Attached: 8D8A48D5-D99B-40DC-ABF2-28A2168A555B.jpg (1372x1372, 780K)

hhhnnnnngggg

this

Depends on stock.
>wide with slide, or thin will win

Attached: 9b8cd2025cda30e9b2ec9befcd077089.jpg (1037x692, 202K)

i cumed

Wide Vented

Attached: tropical vented hk33.jpg (750x350, 24K)

Fuck

>scoped 9mm
You can't be serious

its 10mm

Retard

Nogunz detected. 9mm is tapered and unless you have a tilting follower or some other system the mag needs to be curved. Thats either in .40 or Centimeter gang

>calls people noguns

Attached: 78AC7C58-DF8B-4812-B18C-C1AFF0F358B2.jpg (3264x2448, 2.35M)

>is wrong
Early 9mm mp5 mags were straight and look completely different compared to the .40 and .10mm magazines.

Attached: E56ED8DB-D035-4995-BBF5-33C10622F760.jpg (3264x2448, 1.15M)

>.10mm
Fuck

and that's why 30+ round glockazines are curved, right retard?

Attached: ETS_18_174d7945-d099-4015-b314-4e65c85895e3_1024x1024[1].png (799x1024, 565K)

personally i find the wide more aesthetically pleasing. however i bet the thin with a decent heat shield would be nice.

Attached: hans und friends.jpg (4032x1884, 2.24M)

it fucking says 9x19mm on the gun you raging idiot.

9mmx19** im also a raging idiot

Should get the Knights Armament pic rail set up over both of those.

>9x19mm

Attached: 1375937095697.jpg (500x394, 18K)

Circle or oval A2 guards?

HNNNNG

Attached: 1551053090837.jpg (1156x690, 362K)