How Long Would A War Last Between the USA and Great Britain

God save the Queen

oh no...
not those guys...

Attached: 1555088360470.jpg (471x388, 94K)

Depends how long it takes for a nuke to fly from borth Dakota to London.
Bong nukes aren’t very numerous and could be targeted well before they are fired if the US has the element of surprise.
The invasion would take several months and a resistance would last a decade or two before pittering out.

didnt we try to invade canada and got our white house burned or something? not saying its a bad idea now but its kinda odd we dont talk about that moment a bit more.

Part of the War of 1812 when Canada was still part of the world’s largest empire and we ended up stalemating them. It’s been more than 200 years since and now we’re the largest military and economic power on the planet with no reason to worry about the rest seeing as no one has enough force projection to take the fight to our country, and Canada’s soft, civilian underbelly is within 100 miles of our border, meaning attacking them would be a piece of cake.

>didnt we try to invade canada and got our white house burned or something?
This isn't your country, Jose

>How Long Would A War Last Between the USA and Great Britain
Less than a week. Half of the Brits would defect and fight on the side of the US.

Attached: 1530062434708.jpg (1819x2048, 261K)

It was British expeditionary forces stationed in Bermuda that put the Whitehouse to the torch. They allegedly held a fake session of congress in the Capitol Building to decide on whether or not they should burn the city. We don’t talk about it because of how embarrassing the whole thing is. At the same time, any war with Canada post 1870 or so would’ve been a likely US victory.

There were even hypothetical plans in the 1920s for a Canadian invasion that involved gassing Toronto and a few other major cities.

we should probably include the fact that all the irish, welch, and scots would probably deflect as well, while the muzzies would just evacuate to France.

>held a fake session of congress in the Capitol Building to decide on whether or not they should burn the city
holy shit thats brutal

>all

Good luck targeting a submarine that could be anywhere on the planet.

>deflect

The Brits have WAY less nukes and a SIGNIFICANTLY smaller and less funded military.

if they ever nuked a city and thats about all they could do, the entire Island of England would be a smoldering pile of tin!

Attached: 1507200199450.jpg (720x485, 55K)

>It was British expeditionary forces stationed in Bermuda that put the Whitehouse to the torch.
In all fairness, the US burned down the Canadian Parliament building first. The Whitehouse still stands, but the site of the Cannucklstan Parliament is now a Walgreen's drug store.

canada had bantz, who knew?

>canada
>literally just said it was the british detachment from Bermuda
Do they teach you how to read in syrupland or what?

Not to mention the US could saturate the British isles with nukes, while the U.K. could only hope to hit a few major US cities.
There wouldn’t be anything alive above ground in the U.K. by the second day of a nuke fight.

Both would nuke the shit out of each other. America has more nukes and is a bigger country so it'd win an awful victory with of millions of America civilians dead.

>the site of the Cannucklstan Parliament is now a Walgreen's drug store
That's really fitting for Canada.

11 minutes

Harry and the half blood prince

This. The active US arsenal could literally irradiate every sq meter of land in the British Isles. Just one Ohio-class sub can carry more nukes than the entire UK nuclear deterrent. That kind of exchange would irradiate most of west Europe and the East coast though, the central and western US could survive it while the UK would cease to exist.

>1919 digits
spanish flu confirmed to happen again for king george V

I mean, with the right propaganda behind it, we could probably turn the people against the crown. Australia is definitely more on America's side than England's and they'd just strong arm New Zealand for us. Most of the Canucks outside of major cities are ready to secede as well. Bongs themselves are a little harder, especially the Irish and Scottish, but they can't actually defend themselves, so we just have to perform a proper blitz on London and promise those in the countryside a return of gun and porn rights to win them over and blockade the uppity red haired cunts until they shape up.

I would
>T. Bong

In all honesty if we nuked London the bongs would probably thank us. It's their equivalent of California

>Both would nuke the shit out of each other
Not really sure if that's how it would end. Britain's nuclear arsenal is designed around minimal deterrence, not strategic parity. The British would know that using nuclear weapons would invite upon them the destruction of their nation at a level they simply could bring to the US. I think most Brits would rather continue to have a functional country under US rule than no country at all.

This
>it takes 2 years to decide if they really wanted to enter the war or not
>half the people want to fire the nukes, the other half to just surrender
>no half can win so they just keep delaying the declaration of war

if no nukes
>defeat organized military
US on bong would take a couple days
>put down left over resistance
one week
All fighting would take place someplace in the sea then strictly mainland bongland

t. bong
i would personally accept US occupation

A month at most. Hell if we got onto mainland they would probably just surrender. Since 90% of civilians are terrified of butter knives, an actual gun would strike terror into their hearts.

>Canada
>Doing sweet fuck all
Like 90% of our economy is directly linked to the US, if shit kicked off with Bongs we'd just look the other way and cough awkwardly anytime we heard "OI! CUNTADA! 'ELP US MATEAROONIS!"

They'd use nuclear missiles on any carrier group incoming.

>Like 90% of our economy is directly linked to the US
Didn't stop the UK from fucking their economic ties with the EU

>omg man imagine larger army beating a smaller one
Vietnam hurt you didn't it? You can't even deal with the ME or some small country in SA.

EU was turning their island slowly into a shithole. That was entirely for self preservation

Well they actually have guns unlike britbongs.

Brits have an actual professional standing army that while small, is far better trained than the average US grunt

>Muh Vietnam
What the fuck would bongs do if the US invaded? You retards have no jungles to hide in, no guns to defend yourselves. Enjoy getting gunned down by Jose and Rodrigo while you clutch your butter knife.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>bongs would countervalue target

Kek, they don't have the resolve.

t. Nigel "we need more black people" Farage

Holy shit my sides

> mutt denial at its finest
The only people who think the US has good regular infantry is the US. Hence why the UK is currently deployed in over 50 nations either training, advising or mentoring, and that doesnt include UKSF. The UK even has a number of SPIB (special purpose infantry battalions) whose job it is to go around the globe and train friendly nations forces, because its in such high demand. We also regularly hold competitions like Cambrian Patrol which is a world renowned patrols competition that regularly has teams from 80+ countries attend.

T. British Light Role Infantry whose battalion is sending half a dozen training teams to a bunch of countries in a couple months

kek bong would fight with thiere invaders against theire shit hole

i agree brithfags dont worth anything
t. french canadien

>t.Canadian

British 4th infantry of foot, pre-white house. Congrats, you have zero your pathetic cuck country has ever accomplished.

the blitz

you are a god among men, based British army poster

Attached: 1533821601352.png (716x1120, 422K)

Bongs then aren't bongs now.

About tree minutes.

you did not invade us, france sold us and you call it a win
you bong cant even hold a contry of nigs

You're a retard

The war plans for Canada were not something that was serious. In order to wage war you need to know how to fight it. In order to train officers war gaming is common, hypothetical scenarios allow for unique challenges and learning opportunities. In the event you do actually have to go to war well just dust off those plans. Canada was still a Dominion IIRC, the war plans were about war with the British empire and Canada was seen as the easiest way to force a capitulation.

Holy fuck, the stupid don't stop!

the weak die the strong survive

Enjoy having literally bottom tier NATO troops. SOCOM outnumbers your fucking infantry, cucklord.

you all american?

Uhm, I don't think one of our boomers carries more than four of theirs and whatever they keep in reserve, they share a common missile as well..Trident

8 years, 4 months and 15 days

Attached: 59394534_2385708494983887_761411888134225920_n.jpg (800x960, 132K)

Is it silly of me to think the US could completely destroy the UK's nuclear force in a first strike? They only have 4 nuke subs, and they aren't always at sea. Our navies are so integrated with each other that we stand a good chance of extrapolating vaguely where their nuke patrols are. All we'd have to do then is send our ASW assets into overdrive finding them and we wouldn't even have to use nukes of our own.
>when you lose your nuclear deterrent to a conventional first strike
>nottin poisonell m8

Attached: V2n78EF.jpg (1600x898, 412K)

Can't target a CVN with an ICBM.

>far better trained
Christ. Why do tiny militaries always rely on this meme? Britain has a very competent military that is on par with the US on a per-soldier basis. Anything beyond that is just limeys being salty about losing their spot as world leader to their upstart descendant.

> no counterargument
As expected.
> literally bottom tier troops
Except the Paras who are better than your Airborne, the Royal Marines who run laps around US Marines, and our regular infantry whose entry standards and training is longer and harder than US army infantry training. Theres a reason the US sends high ranking officers over here to see how we do things, and we send high ranking NCOs over to you to help you implement what we do.

For example, theres a Royal Marine warrant officer regularly stationed at Parris Island to assist in the development of training programmes, and the US Army often sends a colonel over here to see how the Paras conduct their training. So if we're 'literally bottom tier', what does that make you?

Britain maintains one of the better militaries in NATO, so I'm not sure what he's getting at when he's calling them bottom-tier troops. At the same time, you're just as retarded pretending Britain has some sort of super-elite military that is the envy of American planners. They're competent, like any other western military, but their regular troops aren't any different from anyone else's. The Royal Marines is a much smaller organization than the USMC and operates in a manner more closely related to Rangers than marines. Meanwhile, on the entry requirements front, you can afford to be selective when you don't need that many personnel.

Nowhere did I state that Britain has 'super elite' regular infantry, just countering the allegations that we're apparently worse than our US counterparts, which is completely untrue, and backed that up by the fact that the US, at least on an infantry training level, seems to have a lot of interest in how we do things. You guys have a hell of a lot more money, manpower and toys to play with, and there are definitely areas where you wipe the floor with us; my point is simply that infanteering isnt one of those areas, in my opinion.

Good one...hahahah

But your nuke subs are being tailed by Ivan at this very moment

Fair enough. I think I'm mostly lashing out at people that seem to take the "well-trained small force" argument to the point of implying all UK infantry are basically SAS-tier. Canadians seem to do it a lot with their fairly impressive recent history of marksmanship as well.

Ivan's boats are a hell of a lot louder than Jose's and Nigel's.

>Be me canadian watching the news
>war has just broke out between the britbongs and the amerifats
>both call on canada to help them fight the other
>Britian offers us Canadians exclusive land rights of a box in london
>Trump offers us conceal carry permits and poutines to be added to every restaurant in murica
>”this nigga knows how to please me
>war lasts two days as muricans and canadians go around killing brown people in the uk
>people of britain are white again and thankful
>war ends i get to carry guns now
>only bad thing about the war is the niggers in the states went batshit insane for the canadian delicacy resulting in poutines being banned in the state

Yeah you gotta be a good shot you get like a box of ammo through your whole training so if you want to be deployed you gotta do well on your rifle, without much practice either.
Patricia reportin’ in

You have to give them something to feel nostalgic about. Their country has been invaded and they pretend everything is fine...

Attached: image.jpg (750x1000, 48K)

You made me laugh...good one...

To add onto that, we actually have Royal Marine color sergeants helping out training Marine select midshipmen during their OCS in Quantico. It was pretty neat seeing them do their thing, those were some tough guys. That being said, Britain's main defense against the US or any other existential threat to the Isles is its submarine force, which is, pound for pound, probably the best in the world. Barring their boats just straight up using strategic nukes, the British subs would give American subs, surface warships, and supply ships a hell of a fight, making any sort of invasion extremely costly if not impossible.

About as long as it takes us to travel to London

There’s already US bases in the UK. B-52s could destroy parliament in like 10 mins tops. I imagine the people of Britain would thank us for that one at this point.

thanks for the intel
we will have to change this a-sap..

cheerio m8

Attached: 1479330176236.jpg (957x1118, 444K)

>7 years

I don't think a water locked nation would afford such time.