How many Judas Iscarifudds will fall for this?

How many Judas Iscarifudds will fall for this?
thetruthaboutguns.com/2019/06/daniel-zimmerman/the-gun-debate-is-about-competing-views-of-freedom-and-culture/#comments

Attached: Screenshot_20190604-190119_DuckDuckGo.jpg (1080x2220, 794K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=k2lQAYj6ucg
youtube.com/watch?v=oBON7CKMXjU
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>(((zimmerman)))

> The gun debate isn’t really about the facts, it’s about competing views of freedom and culture.
You can say this for any wedge issue in the last 50 years. Fuck you OP, I want my 30 seconds of life back I wasted reading that.

There are two famous people named Zimmerman and neither were Jewish.

>"competing views of freedom"
>saying that with no trace of irony
My blood is burning, lads.

Attached: 1537168028871.png (1280x853, 46K)

That's a German name.

>my blood is burning
Iktf bro. Feels like that's my only emotion anymore.

Attached: 1557270021860.png (488x240, 178K)

>"The gun debate isn’t really about the facts, it’s about competing views of freedom and culture, and I think Democrats need to grasp that if they want to be effective at reaching more gun owners"
On the reverse, one could say that gun owners need to grasp that if they want to reach more Democrats. In a vacuum, protecting gun rights is very much in line with liberal ideology. The right to bear arms is a civil right and should be framed as such.

>(((german)))
Yeah, just like Goldberg and Silverstein, right? Very German.

It consistently has been, and they've shown they consistently don't give a shit. After a certain point negotiations will break down and we can just get it over with

german = jewish
Try harder

Attached: page.jpg (280x280, 15K)

Except progressives and their neolib stooges do not value individual rights, only collective ones. To them, you only have the right to serve the termite colony.
The reason they don't want you to have guns is because gun ownership prevents them from ruling over you. They don't give a fuck about muh children or muh communities.
Didn't some German king back in the day make all the Jews adopt German surnames?
Anywho, that author is a regular on TTAG and isn't cucked, so it's of no consequence.

Fudds and gun grabbers will always come together to ban scary salt rifles. Happened in Massachusetts with Romney.

bet most of these people have never been affected by gun crime at all.

>to me, freedom means not being free.
Please don't forget that not all opinions are equal or valid

based and anti-kaisercuckpilled

Didn't one of the Moms Demand your Arrest call herself a "suicide survivor"?
>try to an hero
>fail
>"fuckin' NRA!"

>Romney
You'd think Romney would know better. The only reason his family is alive in Mexico right now is because they obtained illegal guns and fought off the cartels and corrupt government.

Attached: 1559435562066.jpg (1668x1612, 944K)

>Melodramatic bitches "attempting" suicide as a ploy for attention
Dime a dozen bitches.

fucking lol. so ridiculous its probably true

Fucking this.
There is a communist agenda alive and well in this country and taking guns from people is only a small part of the actions it must take to enslave our society. The onslaught against the traditional family unit, the degrading and alienation of patriotism, I could go on but you get the point.

>takes 30 seconds to read 16 words
>AKA 32 WPM reading level
Congrats, you're around the level of a newbie first grader.

Attached: WPM graph.png (514x339, 24K)

hahahaha BTFO

But there's nothing worse than the fudds that grew up shooting guns
>ON MUH PAPPY'S RANCH, and i'm just like awl y'awll, I even own guns today LOOK at my .38 spl snubby here, oh and my trusty Ruger 10-22. But you don't NEED an AR-15 and if you hunt with an AR-15 you need to practice more HYUK HYUK HYUK

that's why if you don't have an ar-15 you don't get to write laws about ar-15s

>But there's nothing worse than the fudds that grew up shooting guns
Actually, there is: the POG fobbit "veteran" who thinks his "service" means he's in a position to lecture you on your rights
>looking at you, Pete Buttplug

Or fucking elitist Tim Kennedy who thinks you need to be a former ranger or spec ops to wield a gun responsibly and effectively.

These authoritarian cunts need to be stopped, "liberal" my ass, they constantly bully and oppress people for speaking their mind, ruin lives of innocent people through their corporate Media and IT thugs and try to disarm the people. There needs to be a more vocal presence that ditches this right/left bullshit and just exposes the so called "progressives" for being the authoritarian pigs that they are. Makes my fucking blood boil thinking that this pussy faggots hide behind a veneer of concern and altruism, Im seriously considering leaving my comfy rural community to move into an urban shithole just to fuck with these emaciated, limpwristed bitches

nice try seamus

Attached: TruthAboutGunControl.png (1903x1203, 2.15M)

Yes? Hitler's ideological mentor and the one who pushed for the holocaust was called Alfred Rosenberg. I'm tired of 55 IQ incel mutts thinking every berg and stein name is automatically Jewish

Its the worst, Im a semperfinigger myself but Im getting sick and tired of hearing this shit from """veterans""", Ive been actively telling kids not to enlist and to just buy a rifle and learn how to shoot and patrol on their own. Chat up an old grunt, watch some videos, read some books, you don't need the military to know these things and its your natural right to arm and train yourself

topkek

Yeah, honestly couldn't agree more.
My only comfort is knowing that it will eventually implode on them. Wether through an outright revolt, mass starvation or whistle blowers, the public will eventually know that a one world governing system is the ultimate goal and thankfully human nature yearns to be free too much.

>The reason they don't want you to have guns is because gun ownership prevents them from ruling over you.
If you make your political opponents out to be cartoon villains who disagree with you purely on the basis of "being evil and out to destroy the American people!", you're doing everybody a disservice just to fellate yourself. You can't accomplish anything if you don't make an effort to understand the field you're playing on.

The fact of the matter is that gun control is ideologically opposed to modern liberal sensibilities when you put it under a microscope, and that makes it by far the easiest issue to turn liberals on. You really think a group for whom key issues are reproductive rights, police oppression and the right to smoke what you want are out to "destroy your individual liberties" just because they want you to pay for Jamal's healthcare in the bargain? If the 2A community were not such a political pawn for the Republican party, flipping left wing voters (and their politicians by proxy) on gun rights would be exceptionally easy.

Hmm

Attached: 4A5F4AF4-3BAC-4967-8648-08FA56BC0C7E.jpg (1260x720, 217K)

>natural right to arm and train yourself
How is this concept even hard to comprehend? Humans have existed for at least 200,000 years 95% of that time the men had weapons to hunt and defend their family. It's an innate freedom and still applicable to current society despite some minor evolution.

You are not seeing the entire picture.

>I already knew this
>I read this thing that I already knew
>NOW I AM ANGRY

get a new hobby, this one isn't healthy

Do you think Colbert would kill himself if you traveled back in time to his SWC days and showed him what an insufferably unfunny shillfag he would become?

>minor evolution
Humans are relatively unchanged in the past 200,000 years.
Your point remains the same though, if not strengthened by this fact. Genetically, we're almost identical to neolithic man. Yet we fool ourselves to be a completely new thing above the behavior of killing in defense.

You have a point, I cant take the blackpill knowing that humanity has clawed its way out of worse situations before but its still pretty damn irritating to be living in the degeneration phase, not knowing if I'll live to be young enough to take part in the revolution/collapse phase

Societal evolution is what i meant. The software running the ape is hardly altered.

Im taking a girls out to go shooting for the first time in her life, took some convincing but she came around and I'm hoping I can introduce her to a whole new way of thinking. I've done this with a lot of my friends and acquaintances but its the first time I'll be doing it with a female

godspeed, user

This
Partisanism is bullshit but guns specifically are something that most 'left' people should be all for, if not for the media machine twisting them against it. Guns used to be apolitical.

Women value security deep down. It's worked with all my former gf's

>three paragraphs

hnnnnnnng that Triumph

>opposed to modern liberal sensibilities when you put it under a microscope
No it isn't. The nations that liberals believe that we should emulate all have strict levels of gun control, with some having firearms defacto banned. I have no idea why you'd believe this.

The problem is the FAR left has taken the moral high ground and become the mouthpiece for the entire left.
As we all know, they believe in the curtailing of freedoms to protect their extreme views. Anybody slightly more moderate than them is automatically Hitler incarnate. So liberals are facing an identity crisis they haven't quite worked out. Which means theyre still under the voting yoke of the far left.

Google earth, a few stakeouts, and some weapons are all thats needed.

actual liberalism not modern oppressive liberalism

>Guns used to be apolitical.
Pictured: Leader of the progressive movement, champion of consumer protection and government oversight, protector of minorities from corrupt law enforcement, father of environmental conservation, and early adopter of the rifle suppressor.

Attached: roosevelt.jpg (1656x2405, 1.44M)

Debate is over. You lost. If you had won, you'd be taking the guns. However, you lost, and while you were losing, Americans were buying so much guns and ammunition for private ownership, there is now a glut of both, an AR15 is 60% of what it cost a few years ago and average gun owners keep 1000s of rounds on hand and/or reloading supplies. You lost, it's over. Go for the guns we start a civil war, then America breaks into two or three ethnostates and other.

>guns laws will totally save us, guize
youtube.com/watch?v=k2lQAYj6ucg

My ass.

Based

Begorrah, ye got me this time ye filthy sassenach

Attached: 1446926927027.png (501x684, 80K)

I mean in the broadest possible sense it's true, we believe in having freedom and they don't

Well exactly, his family is in Mexico. He doesn’t give a fuck about others gun rights.

When do we do it, when do we burn them all Jow Forums???

His theme song:

youtube.com/watch?v=oBON7CKMXjU

>Competing views of Freedom and Culture.
Yes, one group believes in freedom and American culture, the others are a bunch of Europe-lite wannabes and boot inhaling government cocksuckers who want to strip themselves and their fellow citizens of the basic capacity to defend themselves from violence, oppression, and tyranny. For all of you who aren't aware either, if you do not support the 2nd Amendment entirely up to and including the ability of the individual citizen to own automatic weapons, artillery, and private warships you are an anti-American redcoat fucking shit and you should fuck off to Europe or some other shithole third world dictatorship.

Attached: FJMoq.jpg (624x468, 234K)

You have to remember that "competing views of freedom and culture" is the author quoting Dems. It's a sort of "Grabbers Say the Darnedest Things" series they do over on TTAG.

Fucking Based

based and americanpilled

>Moms Demand your Arrest

lmao

Attached: 1558996407036.jpg (1024x574, 58K)

>boot-inhaling

I lol'd and I dont know why

based and privatenavypilled
Jow Forums warship meetup when?

i was born in the US and have lived in europe for several months at a time and can confirm this post to be 1000% true, based and repilled

Attached: 1558631809729.jpg (592x436, 18K)

>teddy "Literally just go the fuck outside you weakling" Roosevelt
>progressive
Every day you cunts okay fast and loose with a thesaurus I become further tempted to ask God for a world without language so you can just be beaten for your retarded ideas by whoever is within arm's reach when you try sharing them

>the ability of the individual citizen to own automatic weapons
Sure!

>private warships
Fuck no! The individual citizen does not have the resources to accomplish that, only conglomerates, and the modern right has corporate cock so far down its throat as to have corporations declared people and protected by human rights. They don't need the option to collectively bear arms on top of it. Tyranny is tyranny, whether it's the government or big business.

Progressive has changed meaning. He was progressive for his time.

Totally different definition now. At the time he was indeed considered progressive, we would consider his views to be conservative today.

It's a special subclass of bootlicker who has graduated beyond the normal human capacity to enjoy being a slave to government based authority figures. In the same way that it can't be said that all OPs merely suck cocks, OPs have progressed beyond the normal human capacity for faggotry.

He literally founded the Progressive Party. You are an idiot.

That's the entire point, that cunt is trying to frame one of the few American presidents who actually didn't suck as some kind of hippy

Renounce your citizenship posthaste you dirty lobsterback.

Attached: thats-it-im-gettinme-mallet-24516681.png (500x383, 218K)

My country, 'tis of thee,
Sweet land of liberty,
Of thee I sing;
Land where my fathers died,
Land of the pilgrims' pride,
From ev'ry mountainside
Let freedom ring!

Attached: 1513891458417.jpg (873x598, 102K)

Attached: IMG_20190602_095810_577.jpg (654x960, 77K)

No, it's about our inalienable rights codified in the fucking Constitution you dumb fucking cocksmoking accommodationist shitheel. The title of your fucking column pretends there is a moral and legal equivalency between ourselves and the enemies of the Republic. FUCK.

It’s simple user, explicitly outline the rights of the people, and explicitly restrict the powers of the government AND the corporations.

>we would consider his views to be conservative today
Eh, given his policy direction I think we would call him center-left today, save for the guns and the period racism.

Said no woman ever

Is it bad that I live in a free state but still kind of want one of these things? And that I also want to deck it out with wooden furniture link in that pic?

Everyone rails on how shitty they look but honestly, I kinda like the old with the new.

Ready to get shit on for it.

Why not? It's not customized for cuck reasons. It's customized to resemble the muskets that were used to secure american independence.

Nah, you do you user. But it kinda seems like an aesthetic halfway measure- either get a Mini-14 or go full New Vegas wood AR.

>Its customized to resemble the muskets that were used to secure american independence

I think this is definitely part of the appeal to me. The only problem is justifying spending ~$500 for the complete lower when I could buy 3 PSA's for that price.

And its not like I need ANOTHER AR in the first place, anyway.

Go for it, I have an AR and I still want one of those

I mean, you do you, fren.

KYS, cucklord

>freedom and liberty are subjective

Attached: 1559352030380.jpg (1004x919, 197K)

I think they look good until they actually have a mag in them.

I've thought about getting a mini-14 but they're too expensive and, from what Daddy Harrel tells me, the variances in the production quality have me worried I'll get one that can't hit a barn if I'm standing inside it.

I wouldn't go all "New Vegas wood AR" because its honestly the lack of the pistol grip and the picatinny rail being present that kinda do it for me.

Like I said, its the old mixed together with the new, and for some reason I really like it. The full wood "New Vegas" look just seems too retro for me. (For this particular aesthetic, I do love me a good retro AR)

>implying they aren't

look out boys, we got a regular philosopher in here

Liberty is not subjective. You are free or you're not

You can't reason with leftists. It's a fact that eventually they'll try to take our rights away. They've done it in every other white country. The "based" immigrants won't help you. "Based" gun owning liberals won't help you. "Based" police and military won't help you. You'll either have to turn them in or fight.

That's inevitable.

Attached: 1521856547927.jpg (1024x1024, 162K)

kys