Rate US-Iran combat history

>Good boy
>Dindu
Better than Saudi Arabia

>Iranian win
Uhm look at the kill ratios for the US sweety....

647-10 in favour of the US sweety....

>Waging war with Iraq

Iraq invaded them lol, what were they supposed to do.

Also i don't know why anyone would bring that up to defend the US:

>According to documents at the National Archives Archeological Site (College Park, Maryland), the US supported Saddam Hussein's regime in their use of chemical weapons in the Iran-Iraq war and the Iraqi–Kurdish conflict.
>Reporter Michael Dobbs of the Washington Post stated that Reagan's administration was well aware that the materials sold to Iraq would be used to manufacture chemical weapons for use in the war against Iran.
>He stated that Iraq's use of chemical weapons was “hardly a secret, with the Iraqi military issuing this warning in February 1984: "The invaders should know that for every harmful insect, there is an insecticide capable of annihilating it... and Iraq possesses this annihilation insecticide."”
>According to Reagan's foreign policy, every attempt to save Iraq was necessary and legal.

Remember when the US and the UK then invaded Iraq because they said they had chemical weapons?
How one of the informants in the MI6 report made up their description of the weapons by copying the action movie 'The Rock'?
And then they mysteriously couldn't find them after the invasion?

USA side also neglects to mention this, but we could say it evens out

Life is not a video game, manchild. Fuck off to Battlefiled.

US is funding dozens of militant groups in syria alone dumbo

what the fuck is a sarcasm

As much as the Arab-wannabes have been talking up their superiority, all they seem to be better at than us is getting killed.

>if you kill the enemy, they win

>kill ratio means anything
>looks at both World War, Vietnam War, War of 1812, US Revolutionary War, and Rhodesian Bush War

History aint agreeing with you buddy

Cope

>*Iranian passenger liner identifying itself with civilian IFF*
>"Yeah, FUCK 'EM!"
What's the fucking problem of the burger military?

Attached: r6pmn6pptfe11.png (535x753, 1.04M)

i hate ketchup and i hate bootlickers

please don't post this photograph again

>war of 1812
Well no one won that one. If anything UK was just annoyed that their previous colony wanted to start shit while they were still dealing with Napoleon.

>Iran kills American citizens
>gets 10x of their citizens killed in retaliation
>WE DINDU NUFFIN

>US declares war on Iran
>cannot invade straight away because the Hormuz is mined to shit and Iran has hundreds of anti ship missiles and fast attack craft as well as multiple submarines that cannot be easily engaded by anti submarine aircraft thanks to Iran's AA umbrella.
>US focuses on destroying Iran's AShM assets, Navy and immediate AD network from the air.
>This can be mostly done, atleast on the coast, however it takes weeks-months.
>Meanwhile oil out ouf the Gulf completely stops, Iran uses it's large balistic missile force to engage oil refineries, desalination plants and ports on the other side of the gulf; oil prices potentially soar to up to $200 per barrel.
>Europe and South Asia use their oil reserves in the meantime.
>US is under heavy pressure to end the blockade.
>They push in to soon and they risk taking potentially serious losses via mines, Submarines and AShM saturation attacks.
>wait too long and they risk global economic crisis.
>they push in and begin securing and demining the straight.
>there are casualties.
>some tankers begin to flow back through the gulf, however many refuse as a result of continuous AShM attacks from the Iranian mainland and the risk sabotage.
>Oil prices remain high
>Global economic slow down at this point as oil reserves run out.
>Only proper solution is to invade Iran to properly secure the coastline.
>invading Iran would require the draft for a full invasion, or a costly and potentially indefinite long term occupation in the south of the country.
>War is already unpopular with the American public.
>President Trump reasures the country by reminding them that they would have a great K/D ratio, the best folks, everybody is saying it.

Kek

>t. seething Brit

Also staged terror attacks in South America. Yes, hezbollah and stuff have presence down there. They were involved in a big bombing

Why declare war? We just need to Praying Mantis 2.0 it to make a point

Attached: D9hR-YGX4AUnmpp.jpg (1069x1200, 259K)

c

Attached: Gen Soleimani.jpg (1875x929, 249K)

Attached: D9jfHp1U0AEpX9g.jpg (1080x1080, 158K)

Invading Iran would not require a draft if they don't receive outside support. If you add that to the mix you need to account for a host of other scenarios, such as another global coalition forming to secure the oil, allies betraying us for Russian oil gibs, China and Russia seeing the opportunity for a resource grab and getting into their own conflict, etc.

>Army’s long-awaited Iraq war study finds Iran was the only winner in a conflict that holds many lessons for future wars
armytimes.com/news/your-army/2019/01/18/armys-long-awaited-iraq-war-study-finds-iran-was-the-only-winner-in-a-conflict-that-holds-many-lessons-for-future-wars/

Attached: Soleimani2.jpg (1000x564, 127K)

>8 US soldiers killed and 4 wounded to 1 Iranian civilian killed is a US victory
>10 US soldiers and 2 boats captured to no Iranian loses is a US victory
>$150,000,000 US drone shot out of the sky to no Iranian loses is a US victory

Attached: 1545338414933.png (512x618, 222K)

>be american
>spend 250 million dollars to simulate war with Iran
>entire fleet gets destroyed within a single day
>completely change all the rules so america wins each time afterwards
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002

Attached: 1457902895178.jpg (238x351, 14K)

>Waging war with Iraq
Haha yeah, like Iraq was waging war with the US.

Quickest way to a regime change is to forcefully stop the oil trade. The spice must flow.

>all this shitskin posturing despite not being able to beat the mutts in a war

>Mission failed! We'll get 'em next time!

Attached: FISSION MAILED.png (313x794, 106K)

>more posturing
)))))

>It's posturing when you win

Attached: Laughs in Irish.png (460x689, 519K)

>don’t worry guys we beat a small operation that wasn’t actually part of a war or anything meaningful
I’m thinking it’s posturing

>be retard
>hear about the US “simulating war with Iran.”
>don’t do own research on the exercise
>don’t have the knowledge to understand the relevance of exercises or what their goals are
>post uneducated opinions on a Mongolian pottery discussion board
Wow really makes ya think

Attached: 4DFE4F22-0572-43FA-AC25-E6C15AD04FFE.png (303x311, 178K)

>Iran hostage crisis
>Not anything meaningful

Attached: 1483098171105.jpg (431x415, 20K)

Look at all those shitholes I don't feel sympathetic for. Well ok the east asian bug people are alright but the rest can go fuck themselves.

>The Iran Hostage crisis wasn't meaningful

What did he mean by this?

>would still lose horribly in a war
Clock is up shitskin ))))

>Funding and supplying Arab states in the wars against Israel
Rightfully so, Israel is the persistent aggressor
>Waging war with Iraq
Rightfully so, Iraq was the aggressor

This
Americans are degenerate warmongers

>Occupy London

Attached: 1560819978743.jpg (454x347, 24K)

>America would easily invade a country of 80 million and occupy cities of 9 million people an ocean and a continent away.
>The American public would definately be on board with fighting that war over a drone bro.
>conscription was so popular the last time!

The last time the US was was expected to do something like this they leveled all the cities to the ground and nuked them instead.

I didn’t say mutts would invade I said shitskins lose in war. No way they win. Stay mad

Well I wouldn't say America won in Afghanistan. Taliban still exist.

>The bully gets kicked in the streets so he goes home to beat his wife in revenge

When will they learn the only way to win wars is to defer to military might rather than strap them with so many limitations that they cannot effectively fight. If we're going to go to war we need to go all or nothing.

>destroyer tried to make contact with the airliner time after time
>airline decides not to respond because "fuck you yank we don't answer to you"
>swat it out of the sky
>"OH MY GOD AMERICA GREAT SATAN HOW CAN YOU DO THIS?"

Attached: Iranian Garands.jpg (1075x647, 268K)

>you should answer to US authority or we murder 300 of you in your own fucking airspace

Americans are known for their ethics

"bootlickers" will be the first ones to disarm you cuck, what will you do then?

>bootlickers" will be the first ones to disarm you cuck, what will you do
wonder what sort of larp scenario you got in that pretty head buddy

>Ameristench pigfaggot thinks other countries' civilians owe a response to ameriscum warmongering rusted washtubs floating around
Fucking lol, crawl back into your trailer and keep watching CNN, you miserable piece of shit.

You forgot this one

Attached: 1515.png (580x1281, 125K)

>gamers btfo

The assault, which left five U.S. soldiers dead and three wounded, has been called the "boldest and most sophisticated attack in four years of warfare" and is furthermore notable for being one of the few instances when militants have actually managed to capture U.S. soldiers.[10][11][12]

>boldest and most sophisticated attack in four years of warfare
>5 dead

Attached: 1546702611837.png (500x429, 97K)

So are these sanctions going to calm things down or step them up a notch?

Yeah, read about the details. They infiltrated an american base, passed several checkpoints, complete and utter humiliation for the americans.

To be fair the reason Iran has shot down all these drones and captured prisoners is because we present ourselves at targets close to their nation FAR more often than they do to us.
If iran constantly had drones flying near us and ships full of soldiers I guarantee they would get shot down as well and the soldiers would be taken. It simply doesn't allow us to do anything to them specifically because they aren't on our shores and close at home.

Didn't the Americans have some sort of excercise in the early 2000s where they had to rig it so that blue forces won against the Iranian reds after getting their shit pushed in

Probably because alot of iranians can pass as blond haired and blue eyed.

neither, they're background noise. sanctions are overrated. they can hurt an economy, but not truly wreck it permanently, and they're bad at changing minds.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002

>trying to justify shooting a civilian airplane with 300+ people on board
Russia tier

>After the war game was restarted, its participants were forced to follow a script drafted to ensure a Blue Force victory. Among other rules imposed by this script, Red Force was ordered to turn on their anti-aircraft radar in order for them to be destroyed, and was not allowed to shoot down any of the aircraft bringing Blue Force troops ashore.[2] Van Riper also claimed that exercise officials denied him the opportunity to use his own tactics and ideas against Blue Force, and that they also ordered Red Force not to use certain weapons systems against Blue Force and even ordered the location of Red Force units to be revealed.[3]

Attached: 1534341417955.png (473x354, 179K)

Americans had 17 years to learn from this so maybe the weaknesses are ironed out?
You can't script real life tho

Sanctions usually increase tensions. They only reduce tensions when offers are made to lift them.

based

MC2002 was supposed to be a test of command and control as well as various pieces of simulation software.
Van Ripper is a fucking retard.
>Hmm. This software seems to be missing the module for CIWS assets and anti-missile usage of the Standard missile
>Would be a shame if I pretended my RIBs had the displacement to carry Silkworms
>Oh I'm not using radio comms they're motorcycle couriers you cant intercept those (uses radio anyway)
Literally "you suck because you couldn't beat me while I was hacking the game".

What's the difference between radio comms and FTL motorcycle couriers when the comms are encrypted?