Beretta m9a1 or 92fs?

beretta m9a1 or 92fs?

Attached: __m9_girls_frontline_drawn_by_jacknavy__37c9237db6a609ef6e58b5f4a590cabc.jpg (484x684, 156K)

whats the difference

I wanna fuck the nugget
Also PPK a cute

One of them has fixed irons if I remember correctly.

if thats it then it doesnt fucking matter, buy the cheaper one

>tee hee this chink mobile scam game named uninspired anime girls after guns, so it's Jow Forums!
>tee hee i drew ship turret on this anime girl's head now it's Jow Forums post more lewds of her!
>look this loli has a OD green thong it's Jow Forums!
Anime faggots are the most forced, obnoxious, and low-quality posters on this board.

Attached: 1529792750001.gif (256x256, 1.39M)

crying about anime on Jow Forums is like crying about upvoting on reddit

The only difference is the recoil spring housing is slanted on the FS and straight on the m9. Get whichever one you think looks better.

Thank you for your contribution, feel free to post your egyptian geese at any time

>muh anime website
This is a weapons board, not an anime board. Fuck off to reddit with your shitty analogy.

Attached: 1554474189307.png (1538x988, 720K)

>guy brings up that it's a website founded by and for anime fans
>your retarded ass brings up the board
Look at the banners and front page sometime.

FUCKING ANIMENIGGERS PLEASE LEAVE

Attached: Screenshot_20190623-092719_Firefox.jpg (1080x2220, 735K)

REEE GET OUT

Attached: Screenshot_20190623-092754_Firefox.jpg (1080x2220, 543K)

92A1

LEAVE MY SAFESPACE WEEABOOS THIS IS A REDDIT MAN'S BOARD

Attached: Screenshot_20190623-092728_Firefox.jpg (1080x2220, 729K)

EVERY POST UNTIL YOU LIKE IT

Attached: Screenshot_20190623-093201_Firefox.jpg (1080x2220, 732K)

Bet you'd love /y/ you fucking faggot

Attached: Screenshot_20190623-093312_Firefox.jpg (1080x2220, 750K)

Is this enough (you)s? Are you happy now?

Attached: Screenshot_20190623-093418_Firefox.jpg (1080x2220, 663K)

I just wish we could talk about our cars, monster energy drink collection and how much we're charging our kids for rent.

Attached: Screenshot_20190623-093459_Firefox.jpg (1080x2220, 704K)

I have no post content and I must scream

Fffuuu connection error

Attached: Screenshot_20190623-093605_Firefox.jpg (1080x2220, 667K)

One has a rail.

Hope the jannies enjoy cleaning up this mess

Attached: Screenshot_20190623-094028_Firefox.jpg (1080x2220, 711K)

M9A1 is good because it has the rail and checkering that the 92fs doesn't have.

HOWEVER!!! You can't replace the front sight on the M9A1. Wilson combat used to mil them out for fiber optics but they don't do that anymore.

Which is why you should get the 92A1. It has replaceable front sights as well as the rail. Not sure if it has the checkering but trust me that fiber optic sight OR night sights are going to go a long way.

Or you can just get the 92X or M9A3.

Also some upgrades to consider is Wilson Combat Ultra thin grips and short reach trigger with the D spring with an EFK firedragon compensated barrel and tritium front and rear sights on a 92A1.

I ran this set-up for a bit and it was perfect.

>responding to bait
ya got me
now shut the fuck up nigger

Attached: 1483201546427.png (600x811, 124K)

Whichever one costs less because they are literally the same thing minus a rail that you can install yourself and a recoil spring placed a little differently IIRC. That being said M9A1 has fixed sights, just something to keep in mind.

>gets dubs three times AND trips
Yeah, I'm thinking this user is B A S E D

Attached: 1475728553292.jpg (519x763, 61K)

Yep, don't forget that the M9A1 also has agressive checkered texturing and a FLAT trigger guard as well as a flared magazine well. Also I believe the trigger on the M9A1 is actually a polymer coated trigger on top of a metal skeletonized trigger. Where as the 92fs just has a polymer trigger.

You're welcome to post elsewhere friend.
You've done this to yourself.

M9A1 with a Brigadier slide.

I can hear your childish blubbering all the way from here.

you just posted cringe, bruh

Attached: D8skWdVUIAEXtly.png (1000x1000, 1.03M)

Are we?

Attached: 1561308364739.jpg (998x1344, 713K)