How does it feel that Kimber made a better cc revolver on their first try than Ruger and S&W has ever done? Do you look at your S&W revolvers and pretend the K6S doesn’t really exist? How do you cope?
How can S&W and Ruger even compete?
Other urls found in this thread:
handgunhero.com
twitter.com
By making revolvers that people actually buy
less lemons
Welp, we're done here
/thread
>competing
>CCW revolver
Because it isn't 1960 and the Kimber costs $300 more than the competition.
>being tight w/ money for life or death self defense device
K
>Buying a revolver for a life or death defensive device
K
>using a less reliable gun in a life or death self defense situation
kimberfags on suicide watch
boys, is OP in 3" better than an sp101 in 3"?
no
>too heavy for pocket carry
>only morons belt carry a 5-8 shot revolver when you can have a 15+ 9mm.
J frame and LCR are both better choices for a smol spinboi.
Well, with the kimber you do get a forged frame, a better trigger, and an extra round for the same size
>Jframe, LCR
have fun with your bigass recoil or 38 special Plus-Cuck ammo
the only reason to ccw a revolver over a semi auto is because its idiotproof and you can fit 357 mags in it
$0.05 has been deposited in you kimbershill(Tm) account. Please post again.
Sigh you're either trolling or a fucking retard. Either way this discussion has already happened once today and I'm tired. Have a pretty lady picture.
>less reliable
Shut up Elmer Keith.
im not even joking. the equivalent smith products i can find are the 60, the 640, and the compensated models 586 and 19. the first two derez your hand shooting 357's and the second two are top-of-the-line rare designer models that cost over 1000 and also weigh over 40 oz loaded.
ruger is for grug smash rock's and kimber is a prissy collector company. literally show me a smith that is better than the four i have listed and i will buy it
>YONKERS,NY
hahahaahahahaahaa nope
wilson combat is GOAT
fuck kimber and them NY nibbas
>im not even joking.
Then you're a fucking retard who doesn't understand handgun terminal ballistics. 38 can pen to FBI standards out of a snub no problem. 357 snubs are for retards so you should for sure get one.
GP100 tho?
those are good but massive
sp101 frame is forged also. it's also heavier so handles recoil better. but yeah it doesn't have as good a trigger and is missing a round.
oh shit this changes everything, the kimber footprint is way smaller.
after OP buys one, then his opinion will be considered.
I’m right here boi
cute snek
also buy pic related for those barrel rings
>ruger revolver frames forged
NOBODY TELL HIM
Is this the Jow Forums version of blacked threads
>barrel rings
*cylinder
Thanks homie, I’ll try that. I just use CLP right now
Nothing else I've tried removes those rings from stainless steel guns. That cloth is magic and cheap too.
did you actually take the time to make this lmfao
I'm a huge smithfag but these revolvers are really nice. The problem is that kimber only offers a 1 year warranty while both ruger and S&W are lifetime. Kimber is a poorly run company imo. Like sig they suck as a company but have some nice designs.
bump
Imagine if they made a 7-shot .327 FedMag K6S.
I don't like these triggers on these. Too much creep after hitting the wall.
suck it poorfags
cute snek
> How can S&W and Ruger even compete?
As far as compact .357's go, they really can't. And I love Ruger. The K6S seems like a super nice gun.
>sp101 frame is forged also.
It's not, but it doesn't really matter at all. An SP101 is more durable than a K-frame, despite being smaller. You certainly seem hear of them going out of time far less.