What do you think of this guy? and do you have more funny pics of him?
What do you think of this guy? and do you have more funny pics of him?
Brody Flores
Blake Rodriguez
barely british.
also, valor thief.
Joshua Wright
He is kinda lame. I mean no know he is in the UK so he can't be as cool as shotgun jesus
Nathan Nguyen
he takes logical leaps and presents it as historical fact. he's good about being corrected, but he keeps doing it.
Jonathan Brooks
wow, I'm murican and more british than he is.
Nathan Wright
this is only funny cause he looks drunk af, it just needs a caption to it like
>don't
>*hiccup*
>worry, it's not loaded
Sebastian Ortiz
He is a major retard. Almost all of his videos on firearms and military tactics are pure speculations of a man with zero expertise in the field. He spends 40 minutes talking out of his ass about subjects he doesnt know shit about. Watch his videos about "bren vs mg32" where he gets all sorts of shit wrong (even claiming that the MG32/42 is such an inaccurate weapon it cannot be used in cover groups of flanking attacks). He barely knows what he is talking about
Dominic Gutierrez
Since he claimed that fixed machine guns are more powerful because they do not recoil as much I stopped listening to anything he had to say about warfare in the last century.
William Rodriguez
He had to fake the pic because the real result was 100% pure inbred anglo.
When lab assistant looked at his test under the microscope all he saw was an army of English peasants looking back at him going OI
Carter Ortiz
>0% Finnish
Nathaniel Turner
Complete imbecile. This is a good example of the bullshit he spews.
Eli Lopez
>viheltää
lmao based
he might know a thing or two about medieval warfare but he sure is incompetent about firearms and modern warfare. I stopped watching him after he said HEAT charges burn through armor. Also he seems to not actually understand how firearms work at all
Asher Green
>muh empire
>we wuz
>cavalry was always a dumb idea
>bren>mg42
Lucas King
>Finnish
I think you mean Mongol/Asian.
Sebastian Gonzalez
The bren vs mg42 video is atrocious. He gets a shit ton of flak for it (look at the comments and dislikes) and still defends his shit points in the description. He claims that a soldier lied 18 yards from a mg42 for 45 minutes and the mg fired at him every few minutes and missed every shot. This is delusion, the gunner simply thought the soldier was dead, firing close to something doesnt mean firing at it. As a former MG3 gunner im triggered. He thinks the mg42 is so inaccurate that it cannot hit a person from 18 yards away. Nigger ive shot targets out to 600 meters with iron sights and decent accuracy with it.
David Lewis
He's fun and all, but most of the stuff he says is 1970s TV documentary tier.
He's got quite a fun way of portraying his stuff, though.
Juan Thomas
he is just some random bloke making bold speculations about complex subjects he knows little about that he frames as objective truth and rambles about for 30+ minutes
Alexander Davis
Jordan Hughes
Aiden Foster
lol he does look like a proper cuckold
Jeremiah Carter
He's admitted that he's a failed actor........
Nathan Fisher
context pls
Robert Robinson
He is British, after all
Parker Sanchez
imagine going from the biggest empire in the world to sucking ahmed dick and getting jailed for wrongthink and owning a butterknife
Joshua Bailey
OH NONONONONO
John Gonzalez
He claims that modern weapons do not make soldiers more effective because "Today it takes 100,000 rounds to kill a man whereas in 1800's it was 10 rounds to kill a man"
"Japanese has no word for surrender"
He claims that soldiers in Afghanistan would steal larger caliber weapons because "The Taliban didn't care when 5.56 rounds were being shot at them, they would ignore it, but as soon as the whopping 7.62 was coming they ran!" , because the squad sergeants apparently aren't attentive enough to realize Pvt. Jenkins ditched his service weapon to loot the armory for a mk17.
He claims that mortars, artillery, and indirect bombardment isn't good at killing, and it's meant to suppress, despite artillery being the #1 killer during both world wars.
Basically he's full of fuddlore and makes up believable stories and bends the truth.
Lucas Bell
Jesus Christ this dude is a retard. Comparing fucking muskets to machine guns. Every time his video has some bold title like this you expect some in depth analysis or overlooked factors but what you get is an old retard making up shit and making false claims for 50 minutes (whilst pocketing that ad money, goy)
Michael Wood
1. He looks like hes wearing his older brothers sweater
2. Whats the deal with the pipped collar?
3. Why does he have eyeglasses nailed to his wall?
John Morris
I thought dysentery or some shit was the number 1 world war 1 killer. Also inderect bombardment is meant to supress
Chase Sullivan
his autistic claims rely solely on anecdotal evidence and false induction. He has no idea what he is talking about, he just comes up with some dumb shit idea and tries to bullshit about it for 50 minutes to make it sound believable
Thomas Gonzalez
he claims it like it is entirely ineffective and basically just an annoyance even though indirect fire is tremendously effective at killing soft targets. Same with "muskets being more effective per bullet fired than modern firearms". He makes claims on bullshit premises.
Thomas Morris
To clarify, it was the #1 direct combat-related reason.
David Bell
>He claims that mortars, artillery, and indirect bombardment isn't good at killing, and it's meant to suppress
LMAO, what a mong, IRL it's literally the opposite, infantry reveals and suppress the enemy and then call for anything bigger than their small arms to finish the opposition.
Jacob Jenkins
whats worse he claims that modern firearms dont make infantry any more effective since it took 10 musket rounds to kill a man compared to the 10 000 rounds it takes today. Im entirely convinced he is either senile or has no idea about modern combat tactics and thinks soliders just march on into combat in a single file
Gabriel Watson
>noguns
>neverserved
>makes videos about guns and military equipment
he's as bad airshit larpers at this point
Robert Peterson
he quite literally bases most of his points about troops fleeing the battlefield on his experience with live action roleplay.He is no better than the fat neckbeards thinking they are top tier operators because they have played video games for their entire life
Austin Robinson
He does hold a very vague understanding of modern military tactics which he almost certainly acquired based on tabletop games (don't remember the name) and WW2 memorials he reads. But he mumbles for hours like he did a Ph.D. on tactical maneuvers or some shit
John Price
classic example of a dilettante claiming to be a professional