Why haven't you done this yet Jow Forums?
Why haven't you done this yet Jow Forums?
Elijah Clark
Logan Sullivan
I'm not a manlet so a shotgun with a barrel above 18 inches is perfectly fine for me. I don't need to use dumb loopholes in the laws to be able to comfortably fire a gun.
Xavier Sanders
NO. ITS NOT TRUE!!!
Justin Martin
>I weigh 600 pounds so my house is specially constructed with every door and hallway wide enough to turn around with an 18" shotgun
Easton Ramirez
>i bought a bunch of parts the ATF confirmed was legal under the NFA
>doggo shooters BTFO!!!!
Fuck you people are so deluded and cringy. Leave the unconstitutional law breaking to the patriots who know how to invoke the 5th and leave the miserable ATF jannies clueless and frenzied.
Jose Nguyen
Damn, $290 for a 12 gauge shockwave isn't bad. I don't really care about the brace situation, just always thought it would be fun to have a psuedo-sawed-off.
Benjamin Lee
Because cadoj quickly slipped shotguns into the 2016 assault weapons bill during their time of drafting registration regulations
Logan Bell
That's a nice house.
Jeremiah Smith
>Im not poor enough that the only form of entertainment I have is shoving my face full of dorotos
>Im financially successful enough to have built a pistol AR compact and light enough to move through my house
Get a job fatty
Aaron Wilson
But i already have
Xavier Williams
What'd you do for that heatshield to fit?
Josiah Ward
Get one for a 590a1, that and the shockwaves have a heavy-walled barrel with similar outer diameters. Heatshields for a regular 590 are too small, unless you have a 20ga shockwave
Chase Lee
Another pic
Charles Martin
Wow that was fucking terrible
Jason Flores
>Why haven't you done this yet Jow Forums?
Because I don't have dumpster in need of defending cocksucker.
Owen Bell
>missing the complete point of the weapon
Asher Lee
Charles Anderson
there is no folding adapter on that firearm.
Nathan Clark
Charles Miller
Based and Miller pilled.
Ryan Bennett
It's not an accessory if it has a function, braces do. They are not superfluous.
Cooper Hill
Gavin Parker
But ATF says if it folds and fires like that then that is the length they measure
Liam White
Well mine doesnt. So they can measure this dick. >serve no purpose in the function of the firearm
>make it shootable for amputees
How is this not a positive purpose in the function of the firearm?
Luis Cox
thank you for using my picture
Luke Butler
Because the firearm functions without it and it is not a standard receiver extension
Austin Stewart
The paper says "superfluous" but no amputee is going to be able to shoot a shockwave without a brace on it. Therefore it is not superfluous and is not intended to circumvent the law.
Zachary Peterson
ATF seems to think of function as "the gun won't go bang if we remove this" and they are just mad they got btfo of this brace ruling
Ian Hernandez
And they'd get BTFO in court again over this shit. I mean how the fuck do they even lose to this monstrosity
Zachary Roberts
Hope you're an amputee then, only way you'd probably beat it
William Baker
That was the argument they used for Braces on pistols, it will work here too. There is already a reasonable standard the ATF is being held to with their ruling on braces. It shall be no different in front of a judge on "firearm" braces.
That is one of the main things government agencies are ruled against on, not being consistent.