ITT: past predictions on the future of war

>ITT: past predictions on the future of war

Attached: battleship of the future.jpg (2698x2111, 969K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=c65yQNVPErE
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Attached: combat walker.jpg (3741x2689, 3.94M)

Attached: battlevision.jpg (1024x768, 647K)

Attached: flying ram fighters.jpg (2048x1491, 752K)

Attached: helicopter cavalry.jpg (1432x1080, 517K)

Attached: helicopter cavalry 2.jpg (1320x1024, 325K)

well they got this one mostly right

Why don't we tho. I'd sign up the second they announce this.

>why yes, giving seawater direct access to the boilers in the event of a torpedo strike is a good idea

Based and kamikaze-pilled

#5 should've been, and is "Excellent natural night vision".

AFAIK, horses have no problem moving around even on the darkest nights. Note their BIG black eyes.

what they need is one hand on joy-stick and a ball mounted battle-rifle or LMG, or at least a submachine gun with big drum

not an issue, just a couple layers of one-way flappers.

What might be needed is emergency vents, and scheme to seal off rooms, in case exhaust gets holed and leaks into ship.

daily reminder these are the
>muh HAARP
>muh rods of gods
poster of the 40s

Based as fuck

Attached: 1548276060999.jpg (3721x2689, 3.81M)

Attached: M89mUTo.jpg (3000x2060, 960K)

thats silly by 1940s standards. they stopped putting a main armament turret midship decades earlier because they knew it was dumb.

This looks fairly on the mark for missile cruisers

Attached: crewless war tank.jpg (2356x3344, 1.92M)

Attached: moon invasion base.jpg (1024x774, 649K)

Attached: 1503075326290.jpg (1036x1600, 692K)

Attached: paratrooper.jpg (580x760, 77K)

Attached: HOLY FUCC.png (437x295, 231K)

Attached: retrofuture soldier.jpg (404x851, 105K)

Attached: rolling ball tank.jpg (2209x1521, 886K)

Attached: mg.png (290x802, 533K)

the funniest part is that they thought battleships would be relevant ever again after the pacific war

Now this is some creative thinking

That's from 1940, pre war. But you're right battleship proponents lived on, hell I'm sure they are still around with their arsenal ships

>Throwing a grenade boys!
>Instantly lifts arm up to throw
>Get your hand chopped off.

Doggy style atomic warfare

>let's give our enemy machine guns
Lol
>reaching bottom, it detonates a self-destruction charge
.. but if it falls over, it doesn't go boom.

...

battleships are just waiting for the magic rock to make a comeback

>exhaust funnel acts as a torpedo bulge
How would this have worked? if it got hit the explosion and concussion of the blast would still open the blister and sea water would flow in. Now you have sea water rushing into your engines killing your propulsion.

Am I missing something?

Attached: 1518912270686.gif (304x200, 2.65M)

or a flamethrower

There's literally nothing wrong with this design other than that the US Navy already has more VLS cells than missiles

If America needed am arsenal ship in a hurry this is basically what it would look like, they even made a reasonable engine choice

>right idea
>wrong country

Attached: ed515cdb5a6e8d8dfc1d4c53ba414a7b-e1472904507975.jpg (600x450, 45K)

Those are fucking Elysians Drop Troops

Attached: Elysian_Drop.jpg (300x429, 37K)

I mean, it technically wasn't wrong...
Was this from the 90s? How long did Popular Mechanics hold onto its trademark 50s Raygun-Gothic attitude?

>launching a tactical nuke
>doggy style
Imagine getting the timing just right

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-07-07 at 6.26.00 PM.png (593x569, 372K)

>knights
>late 1940's / 1950's military hardware tech
>fantasy realm Game Of Thrones like battle shit
I would unironically be excited to see this, until HBO unavoidably SJWs up the writing and fucks it up

Attached: 1308853348600.jpg (328x398, 42K)

>Was this from the 90s?

It literally says July 1988 on the bottom of the page.

Air cav wat?

Convince me right now why carrier groups shouldn't have a destroyer-sized arsenal ship packed purely with SM-3 and ESSM for massive point defense fire

based and heinleinpilled

Three of them.

You is small time. future am belong to metabolist architecture and it's great arcology walkers.

Attached: walking-city-1964.jpg (1280x901, 278K)

Who let the Jap in here?

Attached: ron herron the walking city 1964.jpg (949x408, 119K)

no, the funniest part is that people thought america would ever be in a position to fight, when in reality they just gave up when a rising power challenged them.

I'm pretty sure the future of warfare is just what we have now plus more "creative" uses for nukes

that one will happen though, if it haven't already

>taking three days to ship an invasion force to the moon and three days to send it back to earth
>not to mention all the cost associated with housing this force on the moon or assembling the lunar base to begin with
>not just shooting it in 30 minutes from any point on earth to any other point on earth

for what purpose

not a invasion base, but as a missile silo

but what is the point of putting it on the moon instead of the earth? the moon is really far away. you can already hit anything on earth with a missile fired from earth.

and that's exactly why, most nuclear weapons and missiles are all aimed to take down one another today, having a base in the moon literally grants a unreachable position for strike

hmmm

that's an interesting point that I had not considered

this looks fucking awesome and practical

I like it how those are T-70 tanks.

youtube.com/watch?v=c65yQNVPErE

That's the arsenal ship concept. They dropped it after they figured the cost of the ordnance on it would be more expensive than the goddam ship IIRC. Also the Cold War was over.

Attached: youwillnotsurvive.png (209x218, 47K)

steampunk as fuck

Attached: Chrysler_TV-8.jpg (1000x955, 212K)

It takes three days for a ship to go from the Earth to the Moon or back. A rocket will be faster, but you're still giving tens of hours of launch alert from a position visible to everyone. By the time your moon nukes land, MAD has already happened.

Attached: strange-tank-chrysler-tv-1-concept.jpg (767x428, 55K)

>you see comrade if you put nuclear plant in tenk enemy will be to afraid to shoot

Perfect, because then the surviors will be crawling out of their holes when the second wave of nukes hit, all the better to wipe humanity out with

complexity, that many launchers packed like sardines would be a bitch to maintain in situ. and probably impossible to reload and service at sea.

>join the army, they said

Attached: 903lun.webm (320x240, 1.49M)

Attached: 150 short ton (136 metric ton) semi-trailer tank concept 155mm gun.jpg (928x582, 164K)

>british

The moon is very important, from a military standpoint. If you were to drop a rock onto the earth from the moon, you would do incredible damage.

Attached: mendeleev tank concept.jpg (480x360, 18K)

at this point in a nuclear exchange both have already unleashed and received the first waves, the whole detection system will be gone by the first nukes, this will reach with no one capable of detecting it, sateletis can be taken down in the first hours, moon missiles won't even be seen after the first wave destroys detection systems

Attached: Selbstfahrlafette-mit-Absetzbarer-15cm-sFH-18-V1-Model-640x590.jpg (640x590, 31K)

Attached: fra-char2c-drawing-1d57aaf.gif (800x567, 373K)

Attached: battery.jpg (750x622, 62K)

Attached: 1jettanks.webm (640x480, 2.02M)

Attached: Electric Machine Gun.jpg (253x400, 43K)

Attached: T80 155mm gun 2.jpg (850x860, 147K)

Attached: abrams agds.png (1056x689, 418K)

It might make a return as one of the Ticonderoga class replacement designs.

Attached: lsc-line1.gif (1374x1284, 76K)

Attached: tillman battleship.png (900x667, 304K)

Attached: iowa 2.jpg (1132x1200, 384K)

>A fucking ramp

Attached: j2NqcK2.jpg (1190x1340, 346K)

Why have jetpack+parachute when you could have jetpack only?

forgot how much i used to love this stuff. authentic americana, reminds me of being 10 years old again, reading ancient magazines on the couch at my grandparents'

t. Mike

>YFW this was what some admiral said when pitched this idea

Attached: 1436235091968.gif (170x113, 1.17M)

I'm surprised they don't highlight the 9 reverse gears

I like how they're bombing africa

some weird soviet ones

Attached: aod.jpg (750x710, 79K)

Attached: karar1.jpg (750x680, 82K)

Attached: il_570xN.717909057_sl8y.jpg (570x843, 109K)

Attached: augertank.jpg (750x414, 59K)

Attached: CL1201 1100ft wingspan airborne carrier.jpg (743x347, 90K)