How effectively could regular passenger planes be "weaponized" and turned into war jets...

How effectively could regular passenger planes be "weaponized" and turned into war jets? Let's say you had a fleet of 100 passenger jet airliners of various common models. You could militarize them however you wanted. What kind of fleet could you build?

Attached: 5.-Klundert-1920x1080[1].jpg (1920x1080, 230K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Stark_incident
youtube.com/watch?v=5IwKEF_lmAw
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Me_262_Project
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

9/11 should i say more ?

Add dual nuggets on each wing for an ebin Jow Forums murder flying machine

XD xd

fpbp its the only good option really maybe making them into drones first and filling them with explosives might be a good idea though

3 managed to land some hits, in the US, several years ago. So I'd say they're very effective.

Passenger jets are big and slow and would be easily killed by real fighter jets in any sort of in-horizon encounter. Your best hope is to turn some of them into powerful AWACs suites packed full of long-range detection systems, and use those to coordinate missile launches from your other planes from as far away as possible, using the heavy lift capability of the planes to carry bigger and heavier missiles than a fighter jet could carry.

>How effectively could regular passenger planes be "weaponized" and turned into war jets?

The B-52 is basically an airliner

This is a terrible idea because then every civilian craft would have to be considered a potential threat forever. Same reason armys don't cheat and just paint every vehicle as a medic unit.

9/11 but Mecca

Attached: 1539045062585.jpg (576x576, 51K)

You could always either disable the transponder or install a military transponder, and paint them in proper national colors.

The most effective way to use passenger jets in a military context is for logistics. Throw the seats out, use them as cargo planes. That's probably not what you want to hear, so let me suggest strapping giant lasers to them.

Attached: YAL-1A_Airborne_Laser_unstowed.jpg (3000x2400, 2.87M)

Attached: download.jpg (222x227, 13K)

Very good ;)

Not easily enough to ever be worth it. Back in the prop days, there were cargo plane conversions of a few airliners (DC-3/4/6, Lockheed Constellation, Convair 340) in service with the military, and Cold War-era Soviet airliners had seats that folded forward until they were flat so they could pile cargo on them if necessary, but other than that, it's just impractical.

The closest you'll get is either something like this A330 tanker...

Attached: c15ebeeb28fe4d063dbcb420d0e501c7.jpg (1024x768, 61K)

Or something like this ERJ-145 kitted out as a mini AWACS

Attached: KW3555_AWACS_IAF_(32685888110).jpg (1280x720, 491K)

Use it to transport troops. That's the role it's probably best for.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Stark_incident

Is possible

All these are good examples of what OP should want, but I'm pretty sure OP is a retard who wants to use them as fighters. Hell, it wouldn't even be stupid to use a narrowbody jetliner as level bomber, provided you could suppress air defense. But a fighter is retarded, it's like asking how to use the B-52 as a fighter.

he's just thinking about the wrong era.
The Dash8 q400 has around the same power/weight as a p51

Attached: N449QX_LAX_(31294957790).jpg (4016x2669, 875K)

that's what the madlad stole in Seattle last year

Seems to me that flying one full of fuel into your opponent's defense headquarters is pretty damned weaponized.

Would scuba gear be sufficient for an unpressurized cabin? also would small arms fire have any lethality from 30k feet?

The -400s are fucking cray cray. You can exceed Vmo on one engine.

>Would scuba gear be sufficient for an unpressurized cabin?
No, it won't seal right.
>also would small arms fire have any lethality from 30k feet?
Do you really think you can hit what you're shooting at with an AR from five and a half miles away?

The closest thing to an airliner-to-combat-aircraft conversion you'll find out there were the old AC-47 gunships from the Vietnam era. The first few were just C-47s (which are just the cargo version of the 1930s DC-3 airliner) jury rigged with a bunch of M1919s sticking out the side (later versions were upgraded with M134s). The idea worked so well that they ended up doing the same with C-119s, and eventually C-130s. In a pinch I suppose you could do something similar with a high-winged turboprop like an ATR or even (yes, ) a Dash 8. I mean, it's not far off of the firefighter conversions they've already done with them: youtube.com/watch?v=5IwKEF_lmAw

But that's pretty much all the combat capability you could really ever get out of an airliner.

Attached: 051018-F-1234P-016.jpg (1800x1306, 275K)

The one exception is that anything with a payload can be a big dumb bomb / missile truck for a much more advanced buddy aircraft.

>The B-52 is basically an airliner
Biggest problem is airliners have a lot of structure at the bottom of the aircraft, you can't cut holes in it to drop bombs. Bombers are the opposite structural components are at the top with bomb racks hanging off them.

Based retard

so just put the bomb bay in the top and launch the bombs with small rockets, why do I have to think of everything? gosh

Could a 747 or 737 or DC3 be fitted with hard points and or an adhoc bomb bay? I know the EWAR suites and targeting systems wouldnt be too hard but are the wings and control surfaces able to handle hard points? Could the body be modified to hold an internal bay where luggage would be? A militarized 747 or A300 would be cool as shit.

Attached: rlabfdndjnelosjgyuw5.jpg (1600x900, 86K)

Attached: 1126412549999.jpg (400x1210, 63K)

RIP Skyking you'll not be forgotten

Remove passenger doors, install mechanisms for plopping bombs out the side. Bombs stored on tracks at the side of the fuselage (no different from passengers) and are slid into position for the bomb-plopper to chuck them out the side in rapid succession without breaking cabin pressure. In place of bombs, could be anything from any off-bore compatible missile to moderate size UAVs. Walkspace down the middle in between the payload tracks, manual work could be done to switch payload tracks this way.

The 747-8F doesn't even have a meaningful payload.

Turn them into missile trucks that kinda just push the missile out the back.

The French crafted a bomb truck out of their P-3 esque Atlantique Brequet. GBUs, torpedos and naval mine deployers.

Attached: 13-underside.jpg (576x432, 38K)

>The Dash8 q400 has around the same power/weight as a p51
Someone needs to put one of those engines into a ww2 fighter or replica.

Have niggas not heard of the P8 Poseidon?

Pic related

Attached: images (22).jpg (462x318, 30K)

Is there a pic of this plane with multicolor paint job, or like a pride flag. I need it for reasons.

>ww2 fighter or replica
I think it's been done with turboprops. Related: ME-262 replicas are built with modern GE engines wrapped in period authentic nacelles.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Me_262_Project

What this guy said. This is probably the closest the military has ever gotten to using transport and logistics aircraft as an operational, functional weapons system. Why break it? It works.

>not flying upside down to drop your bombs

>not opening the window and chucking bombs out of it

And Tel Aviv too

Attached: 1562681360920.jpg (1024x602, 75K)

this is actually quite smart

NUGGET TIME

jesus fuck. Now i need to get some interestin use of those engines

What you're probably thinking of is basically a Super Tucano

Fill with boom.
Fly into object with cover from fighter escort.
Or you know, just use missiles.

Ill add on to say that with the insane skills of amateur rocketeers and RC/drone pilots with cheap electronics in today's age, making homemade guided bombs (even rocketry) to drop out of aircraft is not out of the picture.

Imagine making your own guided IED bomb to drop out of a Cessna.

Attached: 1533666650950.png (307x324, 111K)

The 747 is a military cargo plane with seats, not the other way around