Macmillan tac 50 vs cheytac m200 in .408

Holy shit your retared, that ammo is 750gr AMAX which is a fucking target round, not for material. Why dont you study up before talking about shit you have no clue about?
Anything your getting for $2.5 a round is going to be well fucking below 2 moa, it's well accepted that round like 647gr api and similar are 3-4 moa.

The glass that Canadian snipers use would would have enough elevation to even SEE the target at the bottom of the fucking reticle. If he was using anything less than a 750gr amax, which even with the elevated bases they do use, his target was at the bottom of the reticle (any lower and it the target is not visible), with his turrets maxed out.

>9ft apart from each other at the closest
Again you have no fucking understanding of what your talking about. 3moa (I'll forgive you being too stupid to convert to yards when using moa) would mean the FURTHEST apart rounds would be a 9ft spread.

No one fucking said the tac 50 is 3-4moa. It's the ammunition. It's a precision rifle and is far more capable the ammunition is the limiting factor and anything that is used for anti material purposes, is not suitable for long range precision shooting. Get that through your dense skull. Rounds capable of that kind of accuracy are much closer to $7-8/round, if your too stupid to hand load (I wouldnt recommend it for you as you would kill yourself thinking you knew what you were doing).
You have no understanding of the relation of ammo to the gun, no understanding of how precision is measured, and no idea what shots like that require.

Attached: P4L Fine-P4L Fein Reticle.jpg (190x190, 15K)

The glass that Canadian snipers use wouldnt have enough elevation to even SEE the target at the bottom of the fucking reticle, if he was using anything less than a 750gr amax, which even with the elevated bases they do use, his target was at the bottom of the reticle (any lower and it the target is not visible), with his turrets maxed out.*

Didn't Cheytac pull some bullshit by intentionally making the M200's made for the Civilian market less accurate than the ones made for the military?

forum.snipershide.com/threads/375-408-cheytac-accuracy.23746/
Looks like the long answer is if they did, it wasn't enough to matter. Short answer, no.

Converting to yards only makes your 3-4 moa claim even more underestimated.
40 x 4 = 160 inches which is 13.3 feet upper bound.
Fine ammo matters.
So dont make ridiculous claims like the tac being a 3-4 moa rifle.
Its well below that.

Are you being retarded on purpose

I can only hope so.

>retard
show me your 408 api

are fucking retarded?
the only real use for 50bmg in manportable platform is ordnance disposal.

user we can see the number of posters didnt change. You do know that right? Just because your got shit on for being stupid doesnt mean you can try to troll after the fact.