>All of Jow Forums is sent back to Dinosaur times (nospecific era) with their Rifles/Ammo/Gear Ect. >Some basic supplies get transported to us but it is not consistant, or always enough for all of us.
>Goals >Keep as many Jow Forumsommandos alive as possible. >Create a sustainable water/food source/purifier >Every Jow Forumsommando has to kill their favorite Dino.
>What Dinos do we have to fight >What guns do we have >How fucked are we
Genral Do's/Dont's Do work together Dont's use other autists as bait. Do think of ways to sustain the large number of people on the board. Don't use other autists as bait.
This is also a thread about Large scale team surviving, so keep this in mind. Some utterley usless cunts will die of course but if you have a perticular skill that could help us let us know how.
WHY ARE SO MANY PICS LATELY THE EXACT SAME SIZE AS THEIR THUMBNAIL SHOULD BE?! There are multiple threads like this and they've been popping up with unusual frequency lately or I've just happened to click them all. Fuck you, you fucking faggot OP.
Fuck you and your gay thread for not using good images
we immediately die due to atmospheric changes and archeologists find our amalgamation of milsurp, rustingtons, and tacky shit squashed into a dino foot shaped table with us all turned to oil or reborn in a responsible bioengineer’s nightmare of a theme park
Liam Turner
>Sir whats this?
Thats the great bumpstockasaurus It was nearly hunted to extinction after a large overweight predator that for some reason unexpectedly oversteped its boundries and put them into hiding.
Aaron Lee
>T-Rex may well have had visual clarity up to 13 times better than a modern human. For reference, an eagle has about 3.6 times the visual clarity of a person. Additionally, it was determined that a T-Rex's vision allowed an object to remain relatively clear up to six kilometers away. For humans, it's only about 1.6 kilometers for the same clarity.
>Stevens determined that a T-Rex's binocular range was 55 degrees, which is wider than even hawks. Stevens continued the research with other theropod dinosaurs and determined that most theropods had binocular ranges at least similar to modern raptorial birds (aka "birds of prey").
fuck you and your bullshit expert speculation. it wasn't 10 years ago that dinos still had leathery reptilian skin and people argued about warm vs cold blooded for them it wasnt 20 years ago they were all cold blooded monsters it wasnt 30 years ago the brontosaurus existed
they constantly theorize shit and it gets passed off as absolute and then overwritten within a decade. like people paint the t-rex in the middle of fucking forests when it's a 30ft+ long lizard with a massive inflexible tail. get outta here
The Cretaceous had high oxygen levels, but not toxic amounts. And I'm pretty sure all of us are only interested in the Cretaceous since we wanna bag a Tyrannosaurus.
Matthew Thomas
>bag >bang Fixed that for you
Gavin Brooks
Nice tight Trex pussy
Caleb Sanchez
What rifle is that? It makes my iron the big iron.
Evan Nelson
To foster a better team environment, encourage everyone to go their own way. Once we find out how fucked things are, we'll have better group cohesion if we're still alive by the time we decide to work as a team. For a settlement a place preferably with a vantage point on a hill or with the backside to a cave or cliff. Nearby should be a natural water source to hunt and draw water. Also the biggest concern really is the flying bois and we'll be targeted from above when foraging and hunting.
>Fossil record shows the herd would mourn the dead and kill predators in revenge 100% bullshit
Chase Campbell
>it wasn't 10 years ago that dinos still had leathery reptilian skin and people argued about warm vs cold blooded for them Renowned paleontologist and paleoartist Gregory Paul was drawing feathered dinosaurs in popular publications in the 1980s and that's ignoring the whole "Archeopteryx discovered in 1865" thing >it wasnt 20 years ago they were all cold blooded monsters Jurassic Park was 25 years ago and they were pretty warm-blooded then >it wasnt 30 years ago the brontosaurus existed The Brontosaurus had been declared nomen dubium since the 1960s, only to recently be reconfirmed as a separate genus from Apatosaurus in 2015
you missed the point. dino theory is not concrete and whatever the mainstream views are shift within relatively short periods of time. you didn't see feathered dinos in museum depictions until recently. nor in models in parks.
oh and regarding brontosaurus >only to recently be reconfirmed as a separate genus from Apatosaurus in 201 this highlights my point. decades of arguing over what this dino did and what this one did, then they switch it up decades later. i'm not saying it's all hokey pokey, just that it's pretty fucking hard to say a lot of from what we've got and even the genuine experts can't agree and won't agree.
fuck t-rex and his googly eye bullshit. t-rex aint seein me from 6 miles away.
>tfw the ending of jurassic park 3 didn't lead into a sequel of marines killing dinos and navy pilots bombing/strafing the lot of them Am I the only one who feels cheated by that, Jow Forums?
>only to recently be reconfirmed as a separate genus from Apatosaurus in 2015 Which is fucking bullshit. Like, okay, I can buy that there were two separate species. But you know damn well that they only named them “Brontosaurus” so that some autist (like you) can go “NUH UH. BRONTOSAURUS TOTALLY DID EXIST”
Henry Campbell
>(nospecific era) >What Dinos do we have to fight? you kinda made it impossible to tell didnt you? if it isnt the cretaceous period we don't have to worry about t-rex
Feathered dinosaur shills are the "you're born gay" cucks of armchair paleontology.
James Anderson
I assume we'd be on foot since we wouldn't have a reliable source of fuel? We'd need some heavy weapons, but they would need to be man-portable. I was thinking about a recoilless rifle, but they seem awful heavy. I figure assault rifles with underslung grenade launchers would give the most flexibility.
Jaxon King
They named it Brontosaurus because the referred material had originally been classified as Brontosaurus way back in the 1870s when it was first discovered before the material was incorrectly reassigned to Apatosaurus. Then by the laws of taxonomics, once they reanalyzed the fossils and determined there were significant differences to justify they were different taxa, they returned it to its original name. This isn't some grognard gotcha, it's basic scientific etiquette, and the same reason Tyrannosaurus rex is named what it is and not Manospondylus gigas or Dynamosaurus imperiosus.
Sebastian Ward
Even Satan is scared, oh shit
Colton Gomez
>once they reanalyzed the fossils and determined there were significant differences to justify they were different taxa The differences that nobody seems to know
Caleb Bennett
jurassic world sucks
any film that turns the dinosaurs into boogey men sucks