Why Harry Potter needs guns

Attached: HarryPotter_in_Iraq.jpg (188x250, 60K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=kvBUaW7aQ8c
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Ok, this has been driving me crazy for seven movies now, and I know you're going to roll your eyes, but hear me out: Harry Potter should have carried a 1911.

Here's why:

Think about how quickly the entire WWWIII (Wizarding-World War III) would have ended if all of the good guys had simply armed up with good ol' American hot lead.

Basilisk? Let's see how tough it is when you shoot it with a .470 Nitro Express. Worried about its Medusa-gaze? Wear night vision goggles. The image is light-amplified and re-transmitted to your eyes. You aren't looking at it--you're looking at a picture of it.

Imagine how epic the first movie would be if Harry had put a breeching charge on the bathroom wall, flash-banged the hole, and then went in wearing NVGs and a Kevlar-weave stab-vest, carrying a SPAS-12.

And have you noticed that only Europe seems to a problem with Deatheaters? Maybe it's because Americans have spent the last 200 years shooting deer, playing GTA: Vice City, and keeping an eye out for black helicopters over their compounds. Meanwhile, Brits have been cutting their steaks with spoons. Remember: gun-control means that Voldemort wins. God made wizards and God made muggles, but Samuel Colt made them equal.

Now I know what you're going to say: "But a wizard could just disarm someone with a gun!" Yeah, well they can also disarm someone with a wand (as they do many times throughout the books/movies). But which is faster: saying a spell or pulling a trigger?

Avada Kedavra, meet Avtomat Kalashnikova.

Imagine Harry out in the woods, wearing his invisibility cloak, carrying a .50bmg Barrett, turning Deatheaters into pink mist, scratching a lightning bolt into his rifle stock for each kill. I don't think Madam Pomfrey has any spells that can scrape your brains off of the trees and put you back together after something like that. Voldemort's wand may be 13.5 inches with a Phoenix-feather core, but Harry's would be 0.50 inches with a tungsten core. Let's see Voldy wave his at 3,000 feet per second. Better hope you have some Essence of Dittany for that sucking chest wound.

I can see it now...Voldemort roaring with evil laughter and boasting to Harry that he can't be killed, since he is protected by seven Horcruxes, only to have Harry give a crooked grin, flick his cigarette butt away, and deliver what would easily be the best one-liner in the entire series:

"Well then I guess it's a good thing my 1911 holds 7+1."

And that is why Harry Potter should have carried a 1911.

None of that was related to a 1911 until the end

Holy autism

Attached: 7E53EE6F-D0CF-4765-9542-4C4247FCA242.jpg (4032x3024, 2.71M)

isn't this pasta from like 2013

Guns don't work in the WIZARDIN' WORL'.

I hate that my wife is a Potterfag...

oh guns work...

someone please post the pasta of Jow Forumsommandos and Jow Forumsomrades facing off in the castle, for posterity

But they do. Rowling mentions them in book 4 iirc about metal wands called guns that only use death spells

hahahaha holy shit that's retarded

Jesus Christ that's lazy pandering writing.

youtube.com/watch?v=kvBUaW7aQ8c

Original

Attached: 7A90F84D-3483-40AC-A6F8-18938260B455.jpg (1024x367, 67K)

Never have children. Do the world a fucking favor, and by extension the white race, and don’t bring forth any more future capeshit Netflix watching mentally ill drones

this

What do you expect for a bong who also counterintuitively writes the best case for why everybody needs to stay armed at all times and why we cant trust the "ministry of magic" aimed at kids

Attached: voldemort did nothing wrong.png (1858x320, 40K)

Old pasta.

Also I hate myself for knowing this, but NVGs, like other electronics, won't work at Hogwarts.

Nice.

Your "original" is dated 4 years after mine was saved, and it's missing half the text.

Attached: Harry Potter and the Colt 45.jpg (500x817, 91K)

I can imagine that being pretty fun and ultra retarded

Attached: radcliffe.jpg (800x450, 176K)

Hogwarts was an open carry school.

Colt fourtyfiveus!

Attached: colt fourtyfiveus.gif (500x222, 500K)

>The image is light-amplified and re-transmitted to your eyes. You aren't looking at it--you're looking at a picture of it.
Didn't this totally not work in Bird Box?

Tl;dr a badass one-liner

Attached: TheRightOfMagiciansToKeepAndBearWandsShallNotBeInfringed.jpg (438x265, 30K)

Put me in screncap

It's stale old pasta, fucking r*ddit scum

They do though. Rowling said gun always beats wizards

I haven't seen this in years

Are wizards retards?

This is the same view as modern-day schools.

While also making the case for racial purity and isolation. Voldermort did nothing wrong

This wasn't a gun man who was retarded, this was a woman trying to install a false world view on impressionable children. I .e what happens in our current school aystem

I could totally see a sort of John Wick mixed Kickass style of cinematography, choreography, and dialogue. Would be pretty normie and cringe tier but it could totally be Jow Forumsino and stupidly fun regardless

It was a wizard badly trying to explain the concept to other wizards, not word-of-god narration.

>smelly arm this ya sumbitch!!

i think the guns wooould be useless on them but if he got a drop on them with a suppressed gun and shot them he might have won.

just imagine

you shoot at a wizzard they do a bullet protection spell

you shoot them they get hit they just do a spell they get there hands back.

you shoot at wizzards they take cover make a spell that spell then attacks you you dead

I’m not gonna lie.
I kinda dig it

Attached: 2CFDFA73-CF7B-4A6C-95D7-2251F1C53D2A.jpg (960x720, 68K)