What do you mean I can't rape C

I break the flute into three equal pieces and give one to each.

>Child B
>I made the flute

stopped reading right there. Property above everything

Attached: polar bears.gif (398x444, 265K)

Child B

Child C almost certainly has shit Genes and deserves to be poor

Child A can make or buy their own goddamned flute

Child B. It is their property. They own it. They got the materials and made it. To give it to the other children is to take it from them, to steal, and from a child no-less.

If Child A wants, they could negotiate with B to pay for them to make a flute, or to train them. However they are an entitled shit and have an established sense of superiority.

If Child C feels so strongly, they could spend their labour and work with/for B in order to get a flute. However they are a melodramatic shit over their lot in life.

The header is a joke. You aren't GIVING this flute - it isn't yours, it clearly belongs to B, and you are stealing from them to give it to anyone else. If this was a toy that B owned, in real life, would you decide it belongs to someone else now?

The only good choice is B, stealing the fruit of the labour of the workers is bad
A and C are entitled cunts, only a capitalist could choose A and only a (((SocDem))) could choose C

t. true socialist

Giving it to A is the most logical choice. It has the most efficiency, and she can entertain the others with her ability to actually create music as she is more skilled with the flute.

see what i don't understand is that choosing b can be both interpreted as communist and the exact opposite of communist

so what is the point of this dumb picture

>it isn't yours
why not..

you assert that it's hers and then just assert that it isn't mine, seems like it's mine.. i have it

Stealing from B would deter the creators of value from creating again. If they invest their time and resources and aren't compensated - why would they create any more value?

Giving it to A is the most efficient use of resources. Either A, or a 3rd Party should compensate B.

As C has no place in this, perhaps as compensation, he could be given as a slave to B in order to boost her productivity.

>Can i rape A too?

Attached: download (2).jpg (231x218, 6K)

>Capitalism, the resources belong to those who create value
That'd be communism, friend :^)

Isn't one of the tenets of socialism that there is no personal property? In that case B has no claim to the flute from a socialist perspective. Im not well versed in political science so I'm probably talking out of my ass.

socialists and communists make a destinction between personal and private property

Youre looking at it from a proletariat vs bourgeoisie perspective, but again, isn't the whole point of communism that no one owns anything? In a perfect communist society wouldnt the resources go to the commune and be distributed equally to all?

someone draw porn of them already

>isn't the whole point of communism that no one owns anything?
No, there'd still be personal property.
>wouldnt the resources go to the commune and be distributed equally to all?
No. Your payment would depend on the difficulty of your labour, your qualifications, how good you're at it etc. The difference is that no one would be able to extract surplus value from your labour. How much you make is how much you get.

The teachings of Phyrexia approve this course of action.

Aw fuck, meant to reply to

A/C should be shot. Fucking parasites.

Ok, so i guess it depends on whether you are looking at this dilemma at face value, or view it as an analogy for how society should handle wealth. To me it seems clear that it was meant to be an analogy; The flute represents wealth. Would a true socialist's answer change based on how they interpret the question? From a pure capitalist POV i think the answer is the same regardless.

as far as i'm aware, by "private property" marx was generally referring to the means of production

the point of communism is that the working class owns everything. in socialism the government still owns and operates the means of production

it's not true that you wouldn't own a toothbrush under communism. marx generally hated private property because the existence of private property he believed inherently lead to "accumulation" (people with more wealth make more wealth at a faster rate than people with less money so there's a larger and larger gap)

it's clear that you basically need a trial and error of genocide to ever reach communism, so i can't say i support it practically but in theory i do think it's the ideal system

I don't see the argument for giving it Child C. He can't play it and he didn't make it. How is having a flute you can't play make your life "immeasurably" better?

communists arent focused on wealth distribution thats socdems and liberals
communists are focused on the means of creating wealth factories mines ect not currency distribution

Attached: 1497469729558.jpg (555x370, 16K)

Going to go with A. B created it, but it is a complete waste in her hands. Ideally A would barter or trade with B to acquire it. If not, it is still better than leaving it in her hands. If it is not being used then B essentially wasted resources and energy to make trash.

C is a joke. Absolutely no point in giving it to her.

C should be enslaved. It would still improve her quality of life immeasurably.

Yeah i understand the distinction between personal and private property. Like i said i think it depends on how you are interpreting the question. Is it literally just three kids and a flute or does the question represent something larger? Say kid B is a farmer who grows edible crops. Of course that changes things since everyone needs to eat and not everyone has a use for a flute.

>the existence of private property he believed inherently lead to "accumulation" (people with more wealth make more wealth at a faster rate than people with less money so there's a larger and larger gap)
Imposing a cap would sort that out. No-one can be paid more than 150k a year, no-one can own total assets worth more than 500k, etc.
Set a minimum and set a maximum. People can still be richer than others, so they can still lord over others and feel superior. But the gap isn't absurd.

Yeah i shouldnt have described it as wealth. It makes more sense to call it a "valuable resource." Doesnt that significantly change the way a socialist or communist interprets the question? That is the point i was trying to make.

They can fucking share it get child a to teach poor fag c and b will probably make another

A should buy or trade the flute from B, C needs to teach themselves how to create their own value. The fuck can it do with a flute? They can't play and if they sell it, the money will go immediately on bills or some food. Fuck that. C needs to figure out life and go for a goal, set a small incentive and their family and more privilage people may assist and help

I love how the leaf is doing a mini-spread, as if imitating the american, but is naturally superior by being a qt asian grill.

Hmm, what if I posed this question instead?

Attached: faggot.png (960x720, 153K)

Child A obviously has/had a flute to practise on so thats a no.

How would a flute help a poor person in need of money.

Child B owns it so insta yes???

Make A watch as I kill C, enslave B and force her to manufacture flutes by the hundreds each day or she'll wind up like C, and tell A she better fucking play the flute like a goddamn angel or she's gonna wind up like B.

Why should I give this flute to some kid? Fuck off, it's mine now, bitches!

>Who would you give it to?

No one.

Attached: stirner.jpg (640x752, 93K)

Where does it say you purchased it or gain ownership of the flute? It literally says you just take it.
Cuz you snatched that shit homie. Now you feels bad n tryna make it rite.

>Giving child C a handout
>Destroying his incentive to make his own flute
May as well destroy his fucking future.

Anyways Child B should have it because it is literally their flute and Child A is just bragging and Child C is just being a whiny bitch.

>Child A
Beatnik musician who feels entitled to a free instrument

>Child B
Maker of the flute who provided the materials for the flute

>Child C
Communist.

Anyways I steal the flute because children are weak bitch asses.

Only if you live in India.

A, obviously. Wtf is anyone else going to do with it?

>shes a filthy feminist whore
This is a joke, right?

So you're a communist then?

I'll break it because nobody deserves free shit and they end up fighting over it. Such is the tragedy of the commons, and the only way to win is not to play.

Actually, I misread it. If B is the original owner, then B should have it.

It says the kids are fighting over it. It never said you own it. You're settling their little fight .

cuz you're the goddamn adult

I'm pretty sure this is the only correct answer

The answer is not to take the word of any of these kids at face value. Child B probably took two parts of a flute from some kid's locker, jammed them together, and now she says she "made" it.
I give child C the flute to teach the other two kids a lesson about how to play nice with bureaucracy.

B owns the flute.

B should rent the flute to A who can perform for money. A and B should be taxed on their performance and rent money by me, a portion of this tax will be saved to eventually provide training for C so he can learn how to make flutes.

>I give child C the flute to teach the other two kids a lesson about how to play nice with bureaucracy.

kek

i guess this depends on what i need at the moment, do i need a flute player right now?do i need a flute right now?do i care about this kids at all?anyway the only discussion if it should go to either a or b because c is a useless little faggot

No one made a porn out of this yet.

Attached: 1522206418581.png (699x523, 398K)

best post
/thread

Not everyone is a degenerate

This scenario doesn't make sense. Why do I have the flute? If I've paid for it, B shouldn't demand it back because they've made the money off it. If I've stolen it, I should give it back to B unless I stole it from a shop, B has already been paid for it, unless it's her shop.

if you pick anyone but B you're going straight to the gulag

Attached: 151613142411.png (425x339, 168K)

Why do you think I keep making these threads?

Wtf are you talking about?
Why would c even need a flute for?

Who said you should give it to C?

Maybe exactly that

>give it to
But it's clearly not mine to give, it belongs to child B

I'll make a porn version when I get the chance. It will most definitely be shit so don't say I didn't warn you.

Make them fight to the death, the winner gets to keep it.