*gets into a debate on any subject*

>being a race realist retard

Even a debate with yourself?

Has he ever debated someone compotent that calls him out for rhetorical tricks?

>refuses to debate ryan faulk or sean last
>AGAIN
>makes response video to alt hype
>literally watches 1 minute of a 40 minute video and clicks off of it

Yeah, he's a real genius

Hit me up desu chan

So race doesn't exist? What's your proof of that user?

Listen /leftypol/, "white knight", believe it or not, has nothing to do with race

He is also the guy who is literally, in his own words, in favor of "ethical CP" and being investigated by the FBI for it

>lying on the internet

JF is that you?

Attached: 1520725181790.png (934x643, 683K)

>he's somehow bad because a court retroactively revoked her sexual consent on her behalf

I can't i agree with you

>people with the mental capacity of 10-11 year olds can consent to sex

oh JF you pedo rapist you

I listened to his debate with jontron and most of his rebuttals were just "yeah but what about this" over and over

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method

oregano

Good man, desu. Good man.

looks like he didnt win the gene game. big headed manlet

Except the one with jontron

>Short autists that only picks people who can't defend their positions
>Only does it to get internet goodboy points from feminists and other online retards
>''''''''''''wins''''''''''''

Daily reminder that he picked a fight with his mom and lost on stream.

>*gets into a debate on any subject with people who are literally mentally retarded*
>*wins*

Not exactly hard now is it.

I didn't realize avoiding the opposing argument was a valid debating technique. Thanks, bro.

Why are we having this thread again?

JonTron didn't really have an argument. He just spewed the most uninformed shit imaginable and said he wants the gene pool kept clean.

>he still hasn't disproved the existence of race
Pretty clever to focus on shit that doesn't matter, like JF's relationship with that 19 year old. But let's get to the meat of the argument.

Does human race exist? Why/why not?

watch him "debate" ryan dawson,
dawson make's him look like a fucking child

>two chinamen fuck
>a brown baby isn't going to drop out
easy

His argument was that no other country is actively encouraged to change their demographic and Destiny kept redirecting the conversation after he stated it.

United States demographics have already changed several times.

>actively encouraged

Encouraged how?

why is he always bullying people though

youtube.com/watch?v=0b-Vg50MU50

ask jontron

they look like girls

>Encouraged how?
Ask the democrat party.

I don't remember everything that happened in the debate, I remember Destiny pointing out how the definition of white has changed and will most likely change again.

>United States demographics have already changed several times.
When, and how so? The US has always had a white supermajority and has been a white nation since it's inception.

>Encouraged how?
I'm not that user, but do you or do you not believe there is a social stigma attached to having a negative view of the loss of a White supermajority in America? Have the nations of Europe and the broader White Western world had mass immigration pushed upon them, only to be told by the Government and Media that they are the ones in the wrong when they protest against it?

Sexual attraction towards either gender is involuntary for humans since, mentally, we barely know the difference between them, we only know attraction and such.
Therefore, being sexually attracted to a trap cannot be gay, since it is not within our own choosing to do so, our bodies just do it automatically.
But, having a romantic attraction towards traps would make you gay, since we can control romantic attraction to an extent.
You can make sense of anything if you bullshit enough.

Attached: WhenYouSeeTheirKDA.png (362x336, 246K)

>*solicits child porn*
>*goes to jail*

what is this girls name? i would like to know her name. the name of the girl. in the photo,

Being gay is subjective. To say something is gay based on your own moral believes is a sign of low intelligence. If a man is unhappy with his current self he will not let the world tell him who he is based on what genitalia he was born with. He takes it upon himself to take the pinkpill and rev up the boipussi memes to become a beautiful young lady.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 53K)

They are gay, but only because SEXual orientation cares about an active Y chromosome, making the term obsolete.
Prove me wrong.

>I'm not that user, but do you or do you not believe there is a social stigma attached to having a negative view of the loss of a White supermajority in America?

No? I know there's a social stigma against offering extreme and unlawful solutions to keep america white.

>Have the nations of Europe and the broader White Western world had mass immigration pushed upon them, only to be told by the Government and Media that they are the ones in the wrong when they protest against it?

>mass immigration
a few million people entering a continent of 750 million over the course of decades.

You realise it's to hopefully try and make some of the retards that actually FOLLOW those retard's opinions to see some sense that they're being fucking idiots, and not to get internet points, yes?

It's okay, one day you'll become less of a brainlet.

Attached: 32d80a7b941d8b7421f909c3f2363bb1.jpg (236x236, 10K)

Discussions are made to learn, r-right?
Please don't tell me, that they actually do it just for self-points.

I just said that it wasn't hard to 'outdebate' people who hang themselves so long as you give them a bit of rope. No need to read into my poster nigger.

What came first. The balls or the dick?

Attached: 1522994140860.jpg (821x797, 175K)

A man can have a dick but no balls.

So do you genuinely think people would be absolutely fine with it if you said publicly that you want moderate political action to be taken to ensure America/Europe remain white nations? I.e, the repeal of laws allowing the mass immigration of non-whites in the first place, as most of them were enacted after WWII?

Because in my experience, as a White British Londoner, saying anything like that would get you eaten alive. Saying that you simply want to reduce immigration without even mentioning race will get you called a closet racist, which is equivalent to being branded a heretic.

>few million people
You're underestimating things user. In the decades between 1950 and the present day, immigration to the US has caused the non-hispanic white population to fall from roughly 85-90% of the population to only around 65%. In Europe, the UK has gone from a nearly homogeneously white country to one that is only 80% white and falling as of 2011. White British people are now a minority in London. Other nations share similar stories

This isn't just a few million over many many decades. In the decade between 2005 and 2015, around 6 million people came to the UK alone, which is a nation of only around 60 million. According to reputable projections, neither the UK or US will be white majority countries by the end of the century.

Out of interest user, what race are you?

Attached: whitebritish.png (1280x989, 936K)

have fun in jail destiny

Attached: 1521762435750s.jpg (125x124, 5K)

Pretty much all biologist/genealogist agree that race as we use now is pretty fucking retarded

>So do you genuinely think people would be absolutely fine with it if you said publicly that you want moderate political action to be taken to ensure America/Europe remain white nations

Of course there would be. That would involve advocating for things that are unlawful, radically changing the laws and most likely removing existing minorities because white people are not reproducing enough on their own, which would be even more unconstitutional. Of course people are gonna object to that.

>You're underestimating things user. In the decades between 1950 and the present day, immigration to the US has caused the non-hispanic white population to fall from roughly 85-90% of the population to only around 65%.

And a lot of that has to do with the choices of the white majority. Choosing not to have many kids, choosing to race mix, etc.

>In Europe, the UK has gone from a nearly homogeneously white country to one that is only 80% white and falling as of 2011.

Over 70 years. Do you think the majority of white british people have a problem with that?

>This isn't just a few million over many many decades. In the decade between 2005 and 2015, around 6 million people came to the UK alone

Is that an unreasonable amount? Were they all non-white?

>Out of interest user, what race are you?
White

Most debates are completely worthless because neither side is willing to learn.

I'd throat his cock all the way any day

>radically changing the laws and most likely removing existing minorities because white people are not reproducing enough on their own, which would be even more unconstitutional
There is nothing unlawful or unconstitutional about the potential actions I gave as examples - rolling back the 1965 immigration act which allowed mass non-white immigration in the first place. I never said I'd want the removal of existing minorities, but the retroactive revocation of citizenship has been done before, such as in 1923 when Asian Indians had their citizenship revoked.

>And a lot of that has to do with the choices of the white majority
The non-hispanic white population has grown over the years in the US, while their share of the population has declined drastically. Meanwhile the hispanic and asian populations have exploded in both absolute and relative terms. This suggests that the decline of whites relative to the rest of the population has not been down to the fact that they've had fewer children than other ethnic groups, but rather that vast new populations have migrated to America, reducing their proportion of the population.

>Over 70 years. Do you think the majority of white british people have a problem with that?
Anecdotally, yes. The majority of whites that I know are vehemently against this immigration. Statistically, there's very little data on this that I can find, but look at the Brexit referendum which was largely (although not entirely) about immigration, and the polls that came out in support of Enoch Powell in the 1960s when this immigration was only just starting. About 65-75% of people were for him, an ethnic nationalist, despite the media frenzy against him. He never managed to gain any power because the political parties ousted him.

>Is that an unreasonable amount? Were they all non-white?
It is absolutely an unreasonable amount. 7 million children were born in Britain in the same period, almost doubling the gross increase in population.

>women of any age or intelligence level aren't literal children that deserve no rights

Attached: IMG_9826.gif (500x368, 498K)