How old were you when you realised women behave the way they do in society not because they are malicious but simply...

How old were you when you realised women behave the way they do in society not because they are malicious but simply because that's the result of an evolutionary mechanism that puts child-bearers in a position of power within the mate selection process.

I was personally 19 and I find it hard to believe you people are still here complaining about the relationship system well into your 20s.

Attached: 1519946372932.jpg (1890x1630, 144K)

The key is just as important as the lock my friend.
Do not, under any circumstances, fool yourself into thinking that you have less bargaining powers than some washed up roastie.

Attached: 1514888526044.png (240x233, 38K)

you seem pretentious af op, get a grip man

>please hate women

>thinking what I said had an ulterior motive concerning you

you sounds self-absorbed op, once again ground yourself

I think it's funny that robots have this huge holier than thou attitude even though 99.999% would be slutting it up too if they were female.

How does that sound pretentious whatseover? You sound like you're just triggered and don't have any real arguments.

lol if you don't see that then there's no point in explaining it to you. You'll just say we're butthurt faggots or something anyway.

You sound like a feminist cuck, the picture is fitting of a liberal faggot, even though Jow Forums is retarded, I know what kind of person constantly bitches about it, cucks

the (((''''''''relationship system'''''''')))
women are brainwashed to be attracted to subhumans and society and civilization caters to and promotes the decadent

>Jow Forums
>liberal

really grasping there mate

You're saying nothing. You call people pretentious or use any other insult but the truth remains - if I were a woman I'd abuse the power I had over men and pick the best possible candidate. How is this hard to understand?

I wish women behave based on evolutionary advantageous traits. Thanks alot feminism.

you sound like one of those little kids bragging in online forums about taking community college classes at 13, just really cringey

also I never disagreed with you, technically your argument makes sense, but it's retarded since it serves no practical purpose, it's in the same line of reasoning as nihilistic thought and predeterminist philosophy which would say no one should ever be held responsible for their actions since they were always going to happen, it's useless in a functional society and inherently a non argument if you're attacking people who complain about the moral value of people's actions

I never disagreed with you, I'm just calling you pretentious, you speak like you have everything figured out but really you're just as clueless as the other robots here including myself

I am clueless, you're correct about that. The world is a big complicated place and I don't claim to understand it, but I can't believe that there are people past their teenage years who still think the "bitches and whores" meme is a real phenomenon.

you don't sound like you're open to being reasoned with, you sound like you came here to talk down on people who you feel like are intellectually and morally inferior to yourself in order to make yourself feel good.

you say robots shouldn't be mad at women because they are simply acting out how evolution taught them to. well evolution also taught people to react negatively when people with power choose them to be the have nots and others to be the haves for factors out of their control. would this not be equally reasonable?

You have to understand that for threads to gain any traction they have to be written in a condescending manner that elicits emotional responses in people. I could rephrase my thought in a much more neutral tone but it would get ignored. To be fair, I'm drunk right now and I don't even know why I made this thread but I think the misogyny is a bit silly and has been for many years. It's basically rooted in anger and there's nothing rational about it.

Please, don't waste any more time for this fool.

We don't have enough reasonable posters like you so that the few that actually lurks here start trying to engage some supposedly drunked up imbecile.

I am certainly opened to be reasoned with, but like I said, you need to post in inflammatory manner to get responses. Trust me I've been making threads here for years.

dude, just because someone disagrees with you does not mean it's because they don't understand your reasoning, also you can say you're pretending all you want, but all your messages reek of pretentiousness. obv I don't know you irl so all you have to say is, I only word my posts this way to get (yous), but i'm willing to bet you're closer to your posts tone irl than you'd admit.

>women should pollute the genepool on my personal behalf

Don't you just find it amazing that they all work in unison to achieve this even though they haven't met each other. Like when you look at their behaviours statistically, it all aligns with this shit that I would dismiss if I had never seen the data

Not at all. When I post on other forums I employ a completely different tone. But anyway, I'm not gonna spend any more time defending myself from criticism by an anonymous person on the internet. Thank you for your time and responses. Good luck in your future endeavours. I'm going to the pub now.