They said they found pics on his computers which is probably true. But he's in prison for life and none of the girls who testified against him specifically said what he did. Where is this information? They basically just said in court without him being charged with a crime against them "he's a bad man" why were girls allowed to testify in such a vague way when he was not charged with doing anything to them?
He gave them pelvic exams which was something he wasn't supposed to be doing, evidently. Long ones, some lasting up to 30 minutes.
Christopher Lopez
Giving the wrong exam is not punishable by life in prison
Ethan Gray
It is when you've been doing it for something like 10 years and even to underage girls.
Like imagine this dude came to see you every week for a checkup and just immediately shoved his fingers in your ass for 30 minutes.
Liam Ortiz
nah that's not what happened
anyway the girls kept going back to him, referred their friends to him, and did not specifically say what he did in court- you are speculating. Show me where Mckayla specifically said what you allege- should you not have to at least state what a person did to you when sending him to prison for life?
You: HELP POLICE ARREST THIS MAN Police: why? You: He made me feel sad! Police: OK PRISON FOR LIFE
Nicholas Torres
Are you insane? What do you think the entire case was about? Just arresting a man and giving him several concurrent life sentences for no reason?
He stuck his fingers up little girls' bungholes for ten years at every regular check up using his authority as a doctor to write it off as "pelvic exams." What part of this is not clear? Would you want a doctor you visit on a weekly basis giving you a "prostate exam" for 30 minutes each time? Because if you do, that's gay.
Jason Carter
>Because if you do, that's gay. I'm a girl though...
Carson Phillips
double gay then
Anthony Taylor
Uh huh, whatever you say user, whatever you say...
See, this why there had to be an investigation and a trial. He would even do it in front of some of the girls' parents. Thing was, a lot of girls complained that what he was doing was inappropriate but no one took them seriously. They didn't want to keep seeing this guy because he would just start fingering them for an uncomfortably long time. If this happened once or twice, he probably would have gotten away with a slap on the wrist, but you're talking close to 200 girls, many of them underage, for something like 10 years. All those offenses just piled up.
Not only that, during the investigation, they found a lot of evidence suggesting that the guy might be a pervert, as he was also recording himself doing this and had a collection of child pornography.
What OP is asking for is where in court this was alleged and proved beyond a reasonable doubt
is this confusing to you?
Ryder Foster
Got to make sure those little girls are in Tip-Top shape
Brandon Phillips
BUT THE GIRLS NEVER SAID WHAT HE DID IN COURT
WHY
Court: We think a crime may have been committed here Prosecutor: here is no evidence and some girls who said he was mean in non specific emotional ways. Court: prison for life
If you killed someone in a drunk driving accident, I would want the court to prove you killed someone, prove you were drunk, and prove the accident was your fault.
Having the persons wife come in and say "you are a mean man and I am sad" is not sufficent
Brody Powell
I think you might have brain problems.
Elijah Butler
I have a brain problem because I don't think non specific emotional testimony is sufficient to put someone in prison for life?
Juan Taylor
Is this the same guy who was posting about being "persecuted" for hating gays yesterday? He's just in it for the (You)'s. He'll repeat the same thing over and over again, without backing it up, and make his own narrative. Doesn't matter how many times someone tries to tell him something. He's quite obviously a master baiter.
Christian Wilson
I can't say about court because I wasn't there. In the linked NYT article it says that he was using these "pelvic floor massages" inappropriately, that they are used for people with bladder control problems or painful intercourse, NOT for lower back and hip pain. It states that this procedure should only be perforrmed on girls under 18 in rare cases of extreme injury and only after all other possible treatment options have been exhausted. It also states in the articles that he did not wear gloves while performing these procedures, which is creepy and disgusting.
It doesn't have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt with physical evidence. There are hundreds of witnesses who provided testimony to the police whether or not they appeared in court.
Luke Davis
Laughed hard at this - This is the other side of the coin.
Here is a woman who decided that she wanted to use her own vagina to instruct her students on how to give pelvic exams. She's had over 1000 students fingering her insides and she is being praised for it.
>What made this work so unique was that I used my own body as a teaching tool to work with students who were anxious, nerve-ridden and sometimes trembling with speculum in hand, ready to examine my vagina. >It was often the first time those young doctors and nurses-to-be had ever touched a woman's body or seen female genitals besides, perhaps, their own. >This might seem pretty wild to some people, but truly, how better for a student to learn? As a sexual empowerment educator, I know that people often struggle to learn about sex and the body just by talking - they need to have experiences in order to learn.
But none of this is illegal. Is it? I mean yeah he is probably a pedo but still
Oliver Lee
>Jew He did it throw the book at him.
John Sanders
>>It was often the first time those young doctors and nurses-to-be had ever touched a woman's body or seen female genitals besides, perhaps, their own. wtf
Elijah Diaz
user, of course that would be ridiculous. The problem here is you not being able to get a mental grasp of the situation. For whatever reason, you're stuck on this notion that nothing happened and no evidence was presented. The trial would have gone nowhere if that were the case.
Jack Bell
>>It was often the first time those young doctors and nurses-to-be had ever touched a woman's body or seen female genitals
Lots of Pajeets and Ahmeds in med school these days
Michael Powell
What I don't understand about this is did they give him however long it was they gave him and not just call it life with no parole?
Aiden Nguyen
>user, of course that would be ridiculous. The problem here is you not being able to get a mental grasp of the situation. For whatever reason, you're stuck on this notion that nothing happened and no evidence was presented. The trial would have gone nowhere if that were the case. Show me the evidence
Christian Baker
>Is this the same guy who was posting about being "persecuted" for hating gays yesterday? nope
David Roberts
>In the linked NYT article it says that he was using these "pelvic floor massages" inappropriately, that they are used for people with bladder control problems or painful intercourse, NOT for lower back and hip pain. It actually was listed as being used for just that in the article you linked lol
Should we put doctors in prison for life for using a treatment his patients found beneficial after said patients referred their friends to said doctor?
Leo Morales
>I can't say about court because I wasn't there. The testimony of 100+ girls was televised and recorded. It was literally all "he made me sad" without specifics
Nolan Hall
devil's advocate shitposter are usually legit autists i swear
Is defending non specific allegations that result in lifetime imprisonment not autistic?
Lucas Ramirez
Be honest,
would you agree to spend the rest of your life in jail starting at age 50 if you could first spend 20 years fingering the hottest teen gymnasts in the world?
Jackson Reed
I would examine her vagina
(if you know what i mean)
Alexander Gomez
No I don't know what you mean, please explain
Kevin Butler
You've done absolutely no research on your own. Before making this thread, you didn't even know the whole case was about inappropriate exams and that's almost the entirety of the case. Do a google search, you lazy blob. It's not difficult.
Leo Sullivan
Getting to finger all theor wet little pussies and tight little buttholes in front of their parents?
Obviously there not going to specify private details of sensitive stuff to the press or anyone else. Its for the victims, judge and court to know. If they did it could be intepreted at "victim shaming", Im not sure If I agree with that but I can see why but I do agree with keeping it a secret.
Why should the public get to know this? its for the court/jury etc.
William Martin
untrue, I have watched most of the testimony, I can not find the 100+ girls making specific allegations to the court because they never did
David Cox
>Obviously there not going to specify private details of sensitive stuff to the press or anyone else. Its for the victims, judge and court to know. They had all the girls testify in open court on tv lol
>Why should the public get to know this? its for the court/jury etc. Why should the public know what a person has been accused of? Because that's how the justice system is supposed to work lol
Josiah Nguyen
>supposed to work you're just talking about a translation of the accusations tailored to you, somebody who has no influence in the case.
they don't need to be vulgar to define the crime. i don't even understand what your problem is outside of wanting something more explicit to jack off to. either do your research or let it go, lots of actual erotic literature out there sicko
Elijah Jones
Yes, they actually do. Go watch the Ted Bundy trial. They go into all the graphic details of sex dismemberment and rape and murder
it's called evidence lol
I guess you want a world when 100 people can come testify you are hurt their feelings and get put in jail for 50 years for it
Nathan Price
>they do you just contradicted your own argument about this case. re-read my post, Pajeet.
Brayden King
Evidence of crimes is public record.
The fact is 100 girls were allowed to testify not about a crime but about their feelings. He was never even alleged to have done anything to them in court
that's your unprofessional opinion against the experienced judgment of law enforcement and several representatives of the public who saw the evidence. there is no case that satisfies everybody.
Luis Robinson
This one was, that's how we know no evidence was presented by the girls who testified
Jaxson Ward
>that's your unprofessional opinion against the experienced judgment of law enforcement and several representatives of the public who saw the evidence. there is no case that satisfies everybody. >the judge says it's OK for 100 girls to come in here and say that you made them sad and not say what you did even though you are charged with no crime against them, enjoy life in prison
this is ok to you?
Julian Martinez
Why are you even interested in defending this guy? Confirmed pedophile with a CP stash gives minors pelvic exams. It's pretty clear-cut.
Cooper Hughes
>charged with no crime ?
Isaac Howard
>Why are you even interested in defending this guy? Asking for evidence is not defense
Over 100 girls testified that he was mean while he was not charged with doing anything to them at all, look it up
That's the whole point of victim impact statements, they show the jury how it affects these girls and it looks great on the nightly news broadcasts. These are a completely separate part of the trial to actual subpoena'd witnesses, evidence and cross examination all of which is too boring to Joe Public. That's where all of what he actually did would have been presented by the prosecution to the court.
Juan Cruz
>he was not charged with doing anything do you even know what that word means?
Asher Walker
He claimed that he was treating hip injuries with "internal massages" or something like that. Basically he was fingering them, and before you start complaining about it being a medical procedure almost all the girls were minors and before anything like that can be done they have to notify the parents and have other staff there, which he didn't do.
Mason Robinson
>literally "WHY WONT THE GOVERNMENT LET ME RAPE CHILDREN???" the post get fucked pedofag. YOU RUIN CHILDREN'S LIVES DON'T YOU REALIZE THAT
Blake Miller
>Asking for evidence amounts to abusing kids Found the cuck
>being this obtuse we all know what your arguing for, molester
Kayden Ross
No, you look it up. He was charged with and pleaded guilty to sexual assault. Your "not defense" is pointless. Why are you doing this? I can only assume you're deploying some very low-quality bait - either that or you're yet another "not pedophile" arguing that pedophiles are innocent even when proven guilty, in which case you should get off my board and go back to /b/.
Luke Rivera
Article clearly says that he didnt use gloves to perform these pelvic exams in the vaginal and anal cavities. As a doctor, he should have done his due diligence of wearing proper PPE to maintain professionalism and hygiene protocols. Is this evidence enough or do you need more
Did it worked though? New, innovative techniques often sounds weird
Ethan Taylor
Show me where he was charged with not wearing gloves and that the penalty for forgetting gloves is life imprisonment
Luis Ramirez
You don't know shit about anything, you autist
Matthew Howard
>No, you look it up. He was charged with and pleaded guilty to sexual assault. Your "not defense" is pointless. Why are you doing this? I know this is complicated and you are having a hard time understanding what I am saying but I will try to spell it out again more clearly.
150+ girls who he was not charged with doing anything inappropriate to were allowed to testify about nothing but their feelings in open court during his sentencing.
Why is this legal?
could you please be more detailed about where you are not comprehending this?
Kayden Walker
>You don't know shit about anything, you autist ?
I know and watched 100 girls give sworn testimony about their feelings who were never proven to be victims of any crime by Nasser
Colton Rivera
Ok so take your molestation and sexual battery charge, multiply it by 160, then multiply that by 10.
Blake Scott
>Ok so take your molestation and sexual battery charge, multiply it by 160, then multiply that by 10. First charge him with and present evidence of those crimes user
I know touching people is wrong, but you have to prove it happened to sentence people for it...
oh wait no you don't, not if you hurt a girl's feelings
Robert Sullivan
underrated originniginaal post
Benjamin Nelson
>give her a non-lethal orgasm instead
Nathaniel Gonzalez
>dude has a long list of sexual assault claims that were thrown out or ignored on file >150+ women come together with stories about his behavior >FBI finds videos he himself filmed of him fingering little girls with a go pro >they also find kiddie porn >while secretly investigating him, FBI witness him doing it to 20+ more girls and children >he pleads guilty to many allegations
>"WHY IS THERE NO PROOF WHEN WIMIN FEELINGS IS INVOLVED???"
+ women come together with stories about his behavior Would you like to be sentenced for emotional non specific stories about your behavior which are totally unproven and not part of any charge you face?
Joseph Morales
>P: He would come over and play with my vagina no matter what I said, saying it needed an adjustment. He wouldn't use gloves. >J: Is this true, Mr Nassar? >D: Yes. I was just doing a pelvic exam though teehee! -_^ >J: So you admit to doing this? >D: Yes. It was part of the exam! -_^ >J: Why are you doing this when no other therapist does this? Especially with no gloves? >D: Because I'm the best. -_^
He was answered by this user, but chooses not to hear. Why are you all still replying to this autistic bait thread.
Adrian Sanchez
This is how sexual assault law works. We can't go and ask God if this guy stuck his fingers in a bunch of underage vaginas because it was a medical practice or because he gets off on it, so we have to make do with circumstantial evidence. He's a confirmed pedophile, his victims feel like they were violated and, most fucking importantly, he didn't even bother denying that it was sexual assault. Is this not clear-cut enough for you? What more would you like the government to ask for?
>He was answered by this user, but chooses not to hear. Why are you all still replying to this autistic bait thread. How can people never proven to be victims or that he is charged with victimizing make victim statements?
why is that legal?
Zachary Howard
>What more would you like the government to ask for? video taped testimony of the girls crying as they talk about him breaking their hymens
I'm not excusing what he did; abusing your position of authority and taking advantage of girls who you're supposed to have professional respect for, and whom should be able to trust you, is really fucking low. What I will say is, they really had a field day with the whole "wah men are evil" routine and I felt like this became less of a trial and more of a posturing, virtue signaling circus act. What he did was bad, but to lambast him as a creepy old man, and throw down such a heavy sentence was completely unnecessary. I honestly got the feeling they assigned that specific judge, and threw down that specific sentence, to show that "we womyn have the power, hear us roar!!" It's so fucking stupid that we can't even have a court case without leftist ideals permeating the entire thing.
Julian Jones
>Was it worth it, Larry? u know it was
Colton Phillips
I can't blame him, desu.
Charles Hill
Jesus Christ, dude, go ask a lawyer or something if you want the in-depth specifics if "to convince the jury" doesn't satisfy you.
>the government should give me fap material for me to believe their case This may be a board for autistic retards but even we have standards. Please consider killing yourself.
I didn't have time to read your entire fuckoff thread
But anyways, internal pelvic floor release is a real medical treatment. As a matter of fact... it's practically the ONLY fucking way to release your pelvic floor.
Listen up you shitfucks. Touch your non-existent bicep - or maybe it's there cause of your non stop 2D fapping Anyways, go ahead and touch the UNDERSIDE of your bicep now.
And wait nigger, not your fucking tricep, you know some anatomy... right?
Anyways... now, touch your pelvic floor muscles. And then the UNDERSIDE of your pelvic floor muscles. OH FUCKING WAIT, THEY'RE ALL INSIDE YO SHIT AND YOU CAN'T TOUCH EITHER FUCKING SIDE, WHAT NOW
Internal pelvic release, motherfuckers.
I mean, this dude may have very well been shittered
But now, in a time where we're going to have extreme cases of pelvic tilt because noods and high heels and shit, and weebs spending 24/7 in fucking chairs playing games There's going to be a legit need for this medical treatment But now, everybody who watches hurp durp news with their retarded familio and friendos think it's the devil
Goyims m8
Lucas Thomas
wtf why isn't this degenerate fuck in prison, and ostracized by msm?
Lucas Johnson
Johnny? I thought you left this place for good
Liam Jackson
because shes offering an educational service to adults who volunteered to become physicians
Ryder Morris
>Jesus Christ, dude, go ask a lawyer or something if you want the in-depth specifics if "to convince the jury" doesn't satisfy you. There was no jury
you have no idea what you are talking about
Grayson Morgan
Larry was offering treatment to patients who kept coming back to him for years and referring their friends to him
Easton Garcia
If the girls say he sexually assaulted them, then referred their friends to him to be sexually assaulted, could they be charged with crimes?
Carter Hill
The fucked up thing about it is that she outright says that she's doing this for her own sexual purposes. Her degree is, in fact, Human Sexuality. She's literally a career pervert. She's exploited her position to have 1000+ people inside her vagina and she's being hailed as a trailblazing hero for it.
So when a woman and man do the same thing (or something reasonably similar), the man goes to prison for life and probably gets eviscerated while the female gets money and accolades.