I came across this image and I thought r9k might be interested

I came across this image and I thought r9k might be interested.

Attached: 1520862767820.png (960x720, 226K)

i would give it to your fucking mom, how bout that.

B.

Part of me wants to snap the flute in half.

Child B since she's a capitalist.

Didn't this used to be a popular thread not to long ago? Anyone who isn't an idiot would say B since she created it in the first place, capitalism > all else, A can buy one and C can go fuck himself if he really thinks that

It's rightfully child B's, but she should sell it to child A. Child C can fuck off, he's a fag.

>Take a flute
>Shove it up my ass
>Throw it back at kids
Free market will decide after all

Attached: 1519889393661.jpg (1200x1418, 362K)

Obviously the one who made it should keep it. And then the girl who can play it can rent or buy it from the maker. Perhaps the maker will allow her to play it for free as long as she plays for her and receives it back. The boy can fuck off.a

I had just moved to Jow Forums for a little bit.

Id give it to the one that made it. She could make another two and present it to the others. Or she could teach them how to make one for themselves. But she made the effort to create it. The others are just beggars

Child b. Then explain that due to her labor the flute was made, and that the proletariat is entitled to the labor
The worker being entitled to all of their own labor is a very capitalist idea :^)
This desu. She should teach them how to make flutes and they can aid her by teaching in return.

I tell them to fight over it and the winner takes it. Children should learn early on how the world works.

Attached: the weak should fear the strong.jpg (607x608, 36K)

A while ago? Nigger, this picture gets posted here every fucking day and it always gets hundreds of replies.

I had 100+ replies only the first time.

I'm glad we can agree it belongs in an ass.

Attached: 048.jpg (517x536, 116K)

>child a can go fuck herself for being a little spoiled brat piece of shit. buy it from child b if you want to play it you dipshit
>child b, the flute belongs to her
>child c, you can play with the flute if child b decides to donate to you. if not, shut up
tired of seeing this image

Attached: 1504893986218.png (967x954, 554K)

Beat children with the flute. There is no need for music when there is far more beauty in the words of the Koran.

Libertarian righties
Authoritarian righties

No gommies/hippies so far gee

You forget she's also the supplier.

Why do people in sexual situations feel the need to explain that their x is in someone else's y? It's not like the person was unaware of that fact before the statement was made.

>people who posted to shove it up their ass categorized as libertarian
How the fuck did you get a political label from that?

Like it matters, we all can agree however that its fun and this is why we do it

Has anyone drawn nudes of child B for that guy who waifus her? Hurry up, he has to see her intimate places.

I have them already, thanks though.

I'm a libertarian socialist senpai.
That is true, but I don't see a better option as it stands, seeing as the means of productions aren't owned collectively.
Egoists are libertarian :^)

I will tell them that whoever sucks on my weewee gets the flute. After the deed was done regardless of who sucked my peepee, I would give it to B and tell the others to not be narcissistic or lazy. Fucking communist dirtbags.

>letting the child who made the flute decide what they do with it is "authoritarian right"
how many braincells u got user

Give it to B because she made it

Or stab A with a flute, that would be pretty cool ig

>I'm a libertarian socialist
I am an anarcho monarchist syndicalist.

a flute? what are they going to do with that?
they're going to blow whiny music all day. they'd be better off if the flute broke and they got on with their lives.
let them argue over this pointless shit while I look through a telescope at the moon, planets, stars and all the other places they'll never go.

best reply. Congrats

Get this entry level philosophy shit outta here

bebeim
What is rojava then? Since they are not libertarian socialists I guess

They are idiots

I wouldn't give it to any of them desu
>I can use it so it should be mine
No, fuck off. I can use a computer but that doesn't mean I can go into a store and just grab one
>I made it so it's mine
Awful way of thinking. Imagine if factory workers took home everything they produced.
>I'm poor gibe gibe
It would just go to waste. He can't use the flute in any way to better his situation. It'd be like giving an iphone to a kid in Africa.

That said, if I absolutely had to give it to one of them, it'd be the boy. Last thing we need is girls getting used to getting phallic objects into their mouths at a young age. Fucking whores.

Ah, but you forget child b also provided the materials. So a factory worker analogy would not be totally applicable here.

Force all three kids to pass the flute between each other so rapidly that it looks like all three have it at once

Attached: download.png (182x194, 3K)

just get two more so they can all have one you goof, since when can children build violins anyway?

im keeping the flute for myself.

why isnt Child C black or brown? Unrealistic picture desu.

Child B deserves to have the flute. Child A can trade it for something with B if she really wants to play it.

Child B.
Made the flute, and therefore owns the flute

Since when does a flute = a violin?

>child A teaches child B how to play the flute
>child B teaches child A how to make a flute and find the required materials
>child C is invited to observe because, if he learns well, he could be an asset in the future despite being impoverished now
>child A and child C make their own flutes and all three play songs for each other

Attached: 1440645517625.gif (499x499, 538K)

the only rational answer to this shitty proposition

Got posted on Jow Forums withing minutes Child A had black hair and a big nose and was saying her great grand father had a flute like that in Auschwitz, and Child C was black talking about reparations, with child C being given blonde hair of course.

>posted it on /his/
>posted it on Jow Forums daily for a week
>now, on Jow Forums
Curb your cancer, faggot. Sage.

BREAK
THE
FLUTE

This is just plain fantasy. Why would B want to learn to play? Why would would B share her skill with the unskilled workers?

>If B sells her flute to A, she earns money
>When A breaks her flute, B will sell her another

Versus
>B teaches the plebs to make their own shit in exchange for something of no material value (playing flute)
>B can no longer sells flutes because everyone now knows how to make theirs

But hey, at least B can play the flute when she is hungry and whoring herself for a dollar amirite?

>child B develops a paranoid obsession that causes her to make thousands more and stash them in a cave. She eventually falls into a psychotic state as a result of sleep deprivation and makes an assassination attempt on you because you're always out to get her and steal her precious flutes
>child A becomes depressed because she knows she'll never have the opportunity to express her only quality that gives her a reason to live and kills herself
>child C dies of starvation

Cut it into thirds

I miswrote

You win the award of truth in this thread.

If you pick B you are a communist plain and simple. You mean the people who work deserve the value of their labor?! You disgust me commies.

So everytime child B makes somethin you're going to destroy it because the other kids want it? Doesn't seem very fair

killl, marry, fuck

>Why would B want to learn to play?
So that she can properly use the things that she creates in order to increase her quality of life instead of forcing the other children to be dependent on her and her closely guarded secrets.

>Why would would B share her skill with the unskilled workers?
So that all of them could be self-sufficient and so that she has good standing with them if any of them make refinements to her process.

>B teaches the plebs to make their own shit in exchange for something of no material value (playing flute)
Knowing how to make flutes has no material value in and of itself either.

>B can no longer sells flutes because everyone now knows how to make theirs
Doesn't matter because the only reason she would bother selling her flute would be to get A to play for her, and now that they can play for each other it's unnecessary.

The only problem that would persist with all information flowing freely is how the resources required to make flutes would be divided.

Child A can play a flute and obviously practiced with it, thus likely already has a flute, or multiple flutes. She has no need for any more flutes.

Child B is a liar, she is a child and female, therefore there is no chance she made the flute or developed any production line for it. As a liar, she does not deserve the flute.

Child C has no flute and his life will be improved by having it, meaning he has a desire to learn to play the flute and improve his musical aptitude, he is also male, thus deserves the flute by default.

Since ownership pragmatically speaking is based on power, the flute belongs to the most powerful person. Since I am an adult, and therefore the most powerful person in this situation, the flute belongs to me. I therefore choose to give my flute to child A.

Attached: 1460877239082.png (645x773, 9K)

>mfw "muh morality" moralfags itt
This. Not only will I keep the flute, but I'll neuter and take the two males as feminine trap slaves and the female as a concubine.

Attached: 1487447224828.png (799x639, 186K)