>A random girls cheats on his boyfriend.
"Fucking whore! Let's destroy her life forever!"
>The president of the United States cheats on his wife with two different women, one right after his current wife had a baby.
"This is gossip". "Who cares". "Bill Clinton did it too".
Explain the double standard.
It had nothing to do with the fact she cheated.
Its to do with her fucking game journos (multiple) for positive press on her game. The fact she had a bf while she did it just made it worse.
Why are leftists such history revisionists?
While he was president or what?
TWO HOOKERS?
REEEEEE FUCK DRUMPH
"History".
You mean pointless stupid bullshit you shouldn't give a fuck about, and instead just enjoy your vidya?
There's no conflict of interest
As you faggots love to say, what happens in the bedroom is no business of ours
>You mean pointless stupid bullshit you shouldn't give a fuck about
Can't be that pointless if you're here being angry at me for knowing what actually happened.
The first one was just minor drama that would have been forgotten within a couple of months if not for the entire gaming media turning themselves into lolcows over it.
it's natural for men to spread their seeds, while it's not for women due to pregnancy
Go to Jow Forums you absolute faggot
>if not for the entire gaming media turning themselves into lolcows over it.
I remember 20 or so outlets all making "gamers are dead" related articles, on the exact same day
No organization or corruption there. Nope. None.
Angry?
Who's angry? I just find the double standards curious, and find it funny that people gave a shit about something as stupid as gamergate
People cheat and always have who gives a shit. People blow this crap out of proportion. None of this is actually relevant to progress or learning, aside from pertaining to selfish individual practices.
>Who's angry?
You. Its a dead give away in your initial reply to me that you refer to an event that happened as "pointless stupid bullshit" that I shouldn't give a "fuck" about.
You're very, very upset I not only got first comment in thread with the correct detail on events, but that I can detect your outburst without you wanting me too.
Go be a leftist commie somewher else. You'll get less headaches over it.
As long as they use contraception, shouldn't you set aside that automatic disgust response natural selection instilled in you?
No. I should not.
I used bad words so that means I'm angry at something I called pointless.
Ok.
Probably because random ass women cheating has a chance of effecting some bot, so yeah, fuck them. It's disgusting hearing about normal men getting cucked.
Trump is a chad incarnate and his wife is a stacy mail order bride. Their bullshit is amusimg. I'd LOL if Ivanka wound up getting blacked or someshit.
Most likely. Plus your fast response times and sarcastic, defensive tone tend to give it away. If it makes you feel any better, I find you rather endearing.
I meant more stuff like this:
>Worse, you are poor examples of men. Men, good men, defend women. They do not attack them.
>To which end: To defend the honor of Anita Sirkeesian, Zoe Quinn, Leigh Alexander, or yes, Anna Anthropy, I will be willing to meet any of you, on horse or afoot, with sword or pistol, at a time and place of your choosing.
I feel bad for Melania tho.
Why? She's a russian mail order whore.
These people deserve all the suffering in the world
So why should SJWs set aside their emotions then?
>Let's destroy her life forever!"
No one actually said or did this, she just became a meme because "lol, five guys burgers and fries XD". If the white knights hadn't jumped in she would prolly have been forgotten in a week.
>instead just enjoy your vidya
Thanks to SJWs I less and less often find a game to enjoy, cause it is either a casual garbage or plagued with SJW ideals. Go die, faggot.
This belongs on Jow Forums you turboasperger
>leftists
I don't know, she seems like she is not really into defending Trump's bullshit, and she seems genuine when she talks.
Getting royally cucked still sucks, even if you are a stacy or chad.
You meant a jewish girl from California?
And not just "cheats", but sleeps with her boss who is married.
His body, his choices.
Not a leftist at all senpai. I hate them purely because of their normalfaggotry.
It's amusing when it happens to their kind.
I think any billionaire fucks whomever they want, its one of the perks, but if you fuck a porn star bang one better than that hag stormy. Damn
But Jow Forums is a shithole, what's the point
Powerful men must spread their seed to enrich the proletariat. Women have no such seed to spread, therefore they only benefit the proletariat by creating them from powerful men.
>But Jow Forums is a shithole
Exactly. That's why your shit thread belongs there.
So if black people complain because movies don't have enough black people, they are being stupid SJWs and they need to shut up. But if you can't identify with brown people in vidya you have all the right to complain.
Men and women are held to different standards.
The standards women are held to are much more lenient economically but stricter socially.
The standards men are held to are far more lenient socially but stricter economically.
Of course he has a right to complain, you moron. After all, why the fuck should minorities be over-represented in media, as they currently are? Nowadays you can't watch a fucking film without some of the characters being needlessly homosexuals or multi-culti.
If you are black in murrica - your race is already overrepresented in media, if I recall correctly. But if it is still not enough for you - go make your own movie, what is the problem. Like white gamedevs make their own games with white only people in it. Oh wait, but this is racist now so we have to give negative coverage to that gamedev in media.
And you know, I dont give a single flying fuck if MC in a game is a nigger or a normal human, but if you want to insert niggers somewhere they dont belong (middle age Bohemia and Wermacht are good examples) - go fuck yourself. Or if you make half-baked characters which are mainly defined by being trans/gay/colored (like in Tacoma) - go fuck yourself.
All I hear in your post is an anti-SJW being the equivalent of an SJW and getting triggered by the proportion of minorities VS non-minorities in media. All the while rationalising his own double standard.
Let me guess, next you are going to tell me that black people need to forget about slavery and jim crow but white people are perfectly justified in crying about "white genocide" (AKA not a genocide, just having to deal with having more slightly more brown people in their countries)?
Hmmm... no? Lol, why the fuck would you make that conclusion? This might blow your mind, but I'm actually a leftist.
If I take your "concerns" and turn them upside down, it becomes indiscernible from something a women's studies "researchers" would come up with.
Spoken like a true commie.
>If I take your "concerns" and turn them upside down
And if I take your words and and shit them with ass instead, they will worth shit.
.. niga you asked the question you can't play the "LOL WHO EVEN CARES" card
>finding things they enjoy effected by access journalism
>complains about access journalism
stop complaining about access journalism you shitlord!!!!!
Don't worry op i definitely agree with you here, i wouldn't expect to get through to the kind of people here though.
I don't care about gamergate and never have, I don't even care that people have ridiculous double standards, I was just curious in what people come up with to explain them.
but you selected a photo of zoe quinn in a thread about slut shaming
and some dude responded specifically about the zoe quinn slut shaming.
the fuck do you expect?
> hey guys, here's my thread about bullied fascists of the 1930s and I used a photo of adolf hitler but I dont wanna actually talk bout him ok.
Me wanting to hear what people have to say to justify a double standard about a topic doesn't mean I am actually particularly interested in that specific topic by itself.
Yeah I know, but it's still funny to read the rationalisations.
>it becomes indiscernible from something a women's studies "researchers" would come up with
Show me a single women researcher who asks to leave them alone and not shit on their hobbies, I dare you.
your question is based on a thinly veiled presupposition my dude, that being
1. we all agree that women who cheat need to get their lives destroyed
2. nobody detests trumps cheating
thoust doth assume too much
>I don't care about gamergate
>DON'T LOOK INTO IT GOYM IT'S NOTHING BURGER
Go be shill somewhere else. Your nose is too obvious.
Trump cultists are no different than the Jim Jones cultists that let Jim Fuck their wives. They were devout Christians too. These people's mentalities are a sick joke.
The enrichment of mankind and it's future should be the goal of the modern man. Power, however limited, should not be given to those who do not deserve it.
>Power, however limited, should not be given to those who do not deserve it.
Who is gonna decide the "deservedness"? Are you one of the Ayn Rand's fart huffers?
A random girl has nothing to offer society.
President Trump is going after child sex traffickers and illegal immigration on a scale unprecedented in the history of human civilization.
So, there's that.
I can forgive adultery if it means little boys and girls don't end up in cages under the mansions of wealthy psychopaths; dosed with LSD and used as toys and torture dolls.
The president of the United States is an old billionaire who imports his wives from Eastern Europe. "Oh wow he fucks Russian prostitute and cheats on his mail order bride with pornstars!"
No shit. This behavior should be expected. If it came out in 2013 that he cheated on his wife, no one would give a shit.
Donald Trump isn't a president. He's a rich guy who accidentally became president.
>REEE REMOVE DUMB DRUMPF
>HE BIGOT AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
By double standard you're implying that men and women are the same. That is factually incorrect.
Even just on a biological level, K-type males have the objective of spreading their seed, while females have the objective of selecting the best males.
Everything social is downstream from biology.
>most of those bitches are on some democrat payroll
>convenently decides to throw the shit on the fan when he run against democrats, even if he was a billionaire that was on TV 24/7 before
lmao
Didn't she fuck a bunch of journalists that also gave her game good reviews?
Compare that to Trump cheating which is shitty cause cheating is fucking awful, but it's was outside of his duties as president.
Then why did Trump stay completely silent about it?
He usually tweets about literally everything.
why is this not on pol?
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Answered already,
oregano spaghetti
---->
>Zoe will never fuck you
Its not fair bros, I just want to cum inside a mentally unstable goth girl whose into Tumblr fashion.
Melania knew what she was getting into when she dated a guy with two ex wives.
nigga you mad
Trump fucked for fun, Zoe fucked for good reviews. You don't blame Chad for fucking, you blame women for being whores. Women are the gatekeepers of sex, it doesn't happen unless they get raped or agree to it. Men will almost always agree to sex.
>muh drumf
Fuck off
She is a whore because she fucked people for good reviews(payment). she is a literal prostitute. Not that I care though. that is the difference.
Wrong board? Goobergate was more of a /v/ and Jow Forums thing.
>everyone that disagrees with trumps actions is a leftist
Kill yourself
It's 100000000 times harder for a male to get Sex than for a woman, even as a rich male considering that a woman can even choose from a pool from millionaires and billionaires. They literally live life on Kirbys Dreamland tutorial mode.
This thread is a shithole so it belongs there
So you are one of the enlightened centrists I assume.
>Who is gonna decide the "deservedness"? Are you one of the Ayn Rand's fart huffers?
No. Only those who are born with power or work for the purpose of gaining power shall receive power.
Is it 2014 already?
Go home, GG is over.
You fucking faggots will never impeach the president that this country elected. People actually like what Trump is doing and don't really give a fuck if he says meanie words or gets accused of fucking some random girls. And they especially don't give a fuck about your bogus "muh Russia" narrative.
I know that it's difficult for you to grasp, but there are people with different opinions outside of your leftist echo chambers, and that doesn't make them cultists.
/thread
The people trashing Trump are trying to impeach our president and bring the country into worse chaos than it currently is in. That's why people resent the gossip. The random whores, there's no reason to defend them, and there's no secret other motivation to trash them other than what they did was harmful and immoral. Politics are another issue.
Trump is the Chad paragon, I think everyone just assumed he fucked whores regularly.
>Clint gets BJ as president in the White House
>Fucking awesome! Who cares?
>Trump cheated on his wife twice while not even being president at the time
>OMFG IMPEACH
Kek
well, taking the side of the radical feminists and mainstream media is pretty leftist. opinion on trump non withstanding.
>"I did not have sexual relations with that woman!"
seems pointless imo. is there even any proof he cheated?
If there's a double standard, its from the left. Zoe got lots of white knight bux, publicity and feminist attention.
None of us wanted to destroy her life because none of us care that much. Same with Trump, why should we care?