Women have no individuality

Haha you sound gay as hell dude do you beat off to traps and call yourself red pill lol

This rare conditions is guaranteed to have molded you into a person more unique than virtually every other woman on earth.

you're just thinking of white women user. try dating outside your race

Yes, all men. There is no attribute you can apply to men that is representative of 90% (or more) other than 1) straight 2) have penis.
you sound like a retard.

Unlike neckbeards which are all unique snowflakes

Attached: wheeeytet.jpg (581x435, 56K)

With a soft or hard r causr soft r retarded means cool as hell

lol you think this was an intelligent post?
First of all, I'm not a 'neckbear'.
Secondly, neckbeards are a subset of men. Neckbeards are similar, but they don't represent anywhere near all men.
At least 90% of women are exactly the same.

men have no individuality.
>they have the same interests (half life when they were 13, overwatch now and/or sports and classic rock)
>they have the same political opinions (alt-right)
>they study the same subjects (STEM except not biology or geology, and business if they're stupid)
>they all have mommy issues (they think she's overbearing)
>they have the same fetishes ("amateur" girls on pornhub who do anal, also lesbian porn)
>they want the same attributes in women (skinny white staceys with freckles, boy faces, and boy hips)
>to top if all off, they all think they're unique and "not like the other boys" (they think they're different than chads somehow besides chasing the same girls and having the exact same motivations and requirements for girlfriends)

The us government murders people for oil then calls you a monster for wanting to control your own life. Everybody in silicon valley who wants to enslave everybody needs shot in the fucking face. Start with Zuckerberg, then page, then bezos, then cook, then we will see if that sends the message.

We have been castrated. We live in a big ass fucking cage. Fuck that faggot shit. Kill them all.

Come on now, I pride myself in my individualism and creativity, even to an obnoxious level on occasion, but even I'll admit at the end of the day no one is special. Taking pride in your individuality because you're #FFFF02 instead of the most common #FF3023 is fucking stupid. There's only so many colors and with 7 billion people everything has been more or less done a number of times over. Show some humility and stop being such a presumptive cunt. Saying things like "all x" or "90% of x" without any decent data or proof is nonsensical. You're out to justify your negative emotions and it's fucking lame. It's not creative or insightful. There's thousands of people like you on this board.

I just want a pretty stacey who is loving and monogamous. I dont care if she is interesting. She can be interested in the stuff i like or give me alone time.

Every person on this website acts the exact same way, has the same issues and most are male. At the end of the day people just aren't that interesting.

>they have the same interests (half life when they were 13, overwatch now and/or sports and classic rock)
i like none of those things

>they have the same political opinions (alt-right)
i have no opinion on political matters

>they study the same subjects (STEM except not biology or geology, and business if they're stupid)
good job prospects unlike starbucks majors
>they all have mommy issues (they think she's overbearing)
i dont have any of these

>they have the same fetishes ("amateur" girls on pornhub who do anal, also lesbian porn)
nope im into pajama/partial clothed

>they want the same attributes in women (skinny white staceys with freckles, boy faces, and boy hips)
no, i like them curvy, dark hair, no freckles, and feminine faces

>to top if all off, they all think they're unique and "not like the other boys" (they think they're different than chads somehow besides chasing the same girls and having the exact same motivations and requirements for girlfriends)
>no stds
>not obese
>virgin preferred
>innie vag

I legit thought was mocking op

But this isn't true at all. It doesn't work when you try to flip it.
>they have the same interests (half life when they were 13, overwatch now and/or sports and classic rock)
Nope, just as many men into chess as basetball as history as math etc.
>they have the same political opinions (alt-right)
I fucking wish
>they study the same subjects (STEM except not biology or geology, and business if they're stupid)
this actually is kinda true desu
>they all have mommy issues (they think she's overbearing)
This is bs
>they have the same fetishes ("amateur" girls on pornhub who do anal, also lesbian porn)
Are you kidding? The sexual fetishes that men have are probably the MOST diverse things about us as a group.
>they want the same attributes in women (skinny white staceys with freckles, boy faces, and boy hips)
Nope. Just as many men want short flat pseudo loli's as taller than him thick mommies and everything in between. Meanwhile ALL girls want the same man: taller than me confident handsome smarter than me.
>to top if all off, they all think they're unique and "not like the other boys" (they think they're different than chads somehow besides chasing the same girls and having the exact same motivations and requirements for girlfriends)
No man thinks he's "not like the other guys" unless he isn't. unlike women, men admit what they are.

Call me basic if you must but do NOT talk trash about amateur porn

None of these describe me

Dude 90% of women literally are the same, it's not presumptuous at all.
>There's thousands of people like you on this board.
I haven't met a single other person in graduate school for math with an IQ of 142 and an extreme giantess fetish with a taller gf who he calls mommy. I am unique here.

I still like half-life, never played overwatch never will, don't watch sports and most classic rock sucks.
I'm not alt-right
I never went to college
My mom is cool. not overbearing at all, a little too lax but that's okay
no fetishes (thank God)
i like all kinds of women. girl i'm pursuing now is no stacy
i'm a lot like most guys. i can admit that because i don't value individuality as a virtue in and of itself.

If you can't make being unique into being rich or having a fulfilling lifestyle, you're just bragging about being an insufferable faggot who cant find a partner who will tolerate him not the other way around

>durr durr money is the only justification for things

>graduate school for math
>don't understand how to use the word "literally"
>all these logical fallacies
>still no decent data

Come on now. It makes me glad that I dropped out of my mathematics program and started farming. You're all a bunch of cunts so far up your ass you forgot what logic even is beyond shitting out worthless proofs and sucking professor's dicks for grant money.

Fuck off asshole 'worthless proofs' holy shit I should beat your ass for such blasphemy.

>mathematics dropout doesn't understand the importance of contemporary mathematics
shocking

>no punctuation

The only reason I majored in mathematics in university was that it was so notoriously easy to bullshit. Most exam problems, especially the more proof based course, are easily done with little to no prior preparation as it's all intuition. I'd sometimes take exams tripping on acid because it was so easy. There's no real competition because no one would waste their time on shit that has zero application and creates no tangible product. The hardest part wasn't the intellectual struggle. It was the struggle to stay awake because it's all so monotonous and worthless.

>meet girl in hobby related space
>try to befriend her
>turns out she doesn't even care for that hobby
>has no hobbies or interests at all
>doesn't talk about anything except for what she had for dinner or the current happenings at school
>offer to teach her about the hobby
>agrees, but shows no signs of interest while I was teaching her
Why do women keep doing this?

>the importance

You mean that bullshit they feed you so the department can keep getting funded and you can all pretend to be "important" while leaching off society?

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612964/
They've done research on this.
Men are more varied in personality, interests, sexual fetishes, ideal partners, etc.
All woman are the same though.

>dropout
Damn user, I really hope you weren't expecting us to give you any credit.

I finished my bachelors in 2 years and then switched to focusing on a second major the other 2 years in undergrad. "Dropout" was the wrong phrase. I just decided not to go to grad school.

>my entire experience with mathematics is school and university
>what is a career
yeah cool

>im poor and an insufferable cunt

Get the fuck out of my thread, you math hating poopbutt.

they're trying to meet boys
they heard boys do things
so they go to places where things are done and wait for a boy to give them attention
but they are too blank to care unless the boy is 9/10

Have you tried havung sex with her?
If she is hanging around your hobby but not interested in it but hangs out with you.. Maybe she was looking for a man.

math is super retarded and useless though

>men are more varied
>paper actually states that there are variations among women in more individualistic societies
>literally refutes your main point

I don't want to have sex though

Try again m8. No serving of b8 4 me today

Attached: 1501611549696.jpg (640x443, 66K)

I don't hate math. It's a beautiful thing. It's people like you who wear the title while bringing up your IQ and feigning superiority while trying to justify why your so emotionally distraught about women who ruin the entire thing.

Why do you care about women then?
Everyone knows they are only interesting because there are hormones making lust and love feelings.

>no
>no
>no (biology, kinda)
>wrong
>incorrect!
>wrong
>im like nobody (in a bad way)

decent bait though actually first one ive replied to so far in a few days

Seriously get the fuck out right now
>It seems that individualistic cultures enable a less restricted expression of personality, resulting in larger variances and particularly so among men.
the fuck are you talking about

Because I've fallen for the love and affection meme and want somebody who genuinely loves me, shares my interests and whom I can hug, cuddle, and hold hands with.

Go for a girl in an autistic support group. Then you get obsessive interests and the non meme autism

>autistic support group
That's where I am right now.

>says they have SAME fetishes
>never talks to girls

Attached: 2C558769-52CA-4B63-BBE3-84B029794865.jpg (641x530, 37K)

Here's your argument:
>All (you've since dropped down to 90%) women have no (you'll drop down to some variance soon) variance
>Men (90% of them) have variance

This paper:
>Men and women both have variance
>Men have more variance than women

How do you not see the contradiction? You have an IQ of 140+ and you can't see such an obvious logic flaw?

Not to mention the glaring societal influence in play here. The paper concludes that more individualistic societies with less restrictions have variance and, no shit, only a couple decades ago have women even been ALLOWED to vary.

>daddy dom shit and choking
Every single one of them.

Not to mention the test uses the fucking "big five personality" test as if that zodiacal bullshit means fucking anything. What the fucking hell is wrong with you.

They all want to be raped, choked, slapped, spanked, or bound by 'daddy'.
there are no numbers in the paper so I'm using my own.
Decades is more than enough time, I ignore your trips and claim that women all acting this way despite having the freedom to do other things is nothing but further proof that they're all the same.

normies in general have no individuality.

Attached: 1518754104687.jpg (702x1024, 135K)

Not TERFs but they're lesbian

>all women are the same
>somehow men on this board cant get a gf even though they claim there is no variety in females

Attached: 1523991395476.jpg (1280x720, 145K)

That's exactly in line though. If all women are the same and only want the same type of man, then of course the men on this board who aren't that man wouldn't be able to get a gf.
Also, I have a gf.

Oh shit, that line is for you didn't even get the trips, I don't deny you're triple 7's user

Second wave TERFs and fourth wave angry Tumblr feminists don't. Third wave sex positive ones do.

Oh, so the liberal feminists who base their whole ideology of a mix between libertarian "do what you want without judgement" and femininst "everything a girl does is empowering" produces a mass culture of "choke me daddy" girls, and you think this is somehow NOT indicative of what women are like?
TERF's are literally fucking insane retards who think all PiV sex is rape. They specifically deny their sexuality because they think it's innately "oppressive" and they think all BDSM is wrong and should be banned because "the personal is political".

But that makes perfect sense. All women want Chad, and there sure as hell aren't any Chads here.

Still think he is mocking him

its the betas fault that he cant be the type of man that cant get a woman then

>there are no numbers in the paper so I'm using my own.

Holy shit. So I call you out on having no data to back up what you say. You pull out some nonsensical paper--that fucking directly contradicts your main point--that you later say has "no numbers". Why the fuck did you bring up the paper then? You're back to having absolutely no proof to your claim and are now back to just "using your own" as if there's any fucking credibility behind that. Where is the fucking logic?

>Decades is more than enough time
Sure. I definitely think gender relations are changing for the better, and I advocate for a hands off approach to the matter, but you have to be out of your damned mind to not notice any sort of negative influence that shit has had as if a couple decades is supposed to counteract thousands of years of oppression.

Trips are random and meaningless.

>women are literally retarded copies of each other with no unique interests or personalities
>men thus need to sacrifice their own interests and desires to be with a woman
>it's the men's fault that this happens
Youre either a woman or a pussy worshiping faggot.

They get it from watching porn and porn culture. It's not something just inherently there

>angry Tumblr feminists
Don't you mean women? I thought they were all the same. Why did you need to make this distinction?

Uh oh!! Here come the individualists!!

Nu-males all have such uniiquuueeee personalities!

Attached: bugmen.jpg (960x518, 45K)

>literally refutes your main point
HA! Learn to read a results section, you monumental faggot.

> The general trend, however, was that men varied more than women,
>Moreover, in no culture did women vary more than men on all five dimensions,
>whereas in 14 cultures men varied more than women on all five dimensions.

if everyone hates and dislikes you, there is always one lowest common demoninator: yourself

you can only blame others for so long before realizing this

Okay, you want some real numbers?
Women have 65 trillion fewer synapses than men, AND lower synaptic density than men.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9215725

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567215/

It has nothing to do with gender roles. Women are at the level of 15 year old males.

>literally

Stop using this word. You're looking for "figuratively" as in "I'm an emotional faggot who is attempting to justify his emotions by pretending to be rational, but really I have no actual proof for anything I say and can't seem to bring together any semblance of a rational argument but I haven't put my tiny wee wee in a vagina in so long and I'm so mad."

Maybe.
lmao you mad.
>durr durr submit to group think it's your fault otherwise
kys
I fucked my gf this morning. stay mad faggot.

>varied more

As in, they varied at all, which directly contradicts your claim.

You're basically saying x = 0 because y > x. Graduate school in mathematics my fucking ass if you can't realize how illogical that is.

Their variance is negligible.
Also that user isn't me.

Autistic women have more synaptic density and synapses than neurotypical men.

And they make up, what, 0.2% of women?

My favorite lines from your paper:

> The most consistently reported differences relate to spatial and language abilities, and whereas men excel in mental rotation and spatial perception, women perform better in verbal memory tasks, in verbal fluency tasks, and in the speed of articulation (1, 2).

>women perform better in verbal memory tasks, in verbal fluency tasks, and in the speed of articulation (1, 2).

>Because we examined only relatively few cases (four women and four men), we consider that these differences must therefore be very robust in the general population.

Hold on let me repeat that last one

>FOUR WOMEN AND FOUR MEN
>SAMPLE SIZE FUCKING 4

>Their variance is negligible.
That is not what your paper says.

>lmao you mad.
not really, only showing that men are also bland memetic copies of one another for the most part

>i like football, tits and beer
wooowiiie...

Every single man I've met has the same personality and still somehow the same absurd levels of self-importance and think they have any right to criticize women. lol

user you replied to, not originalio who posted study.
No degree in math, just know how to read and think logically.
Never claimed women don't vary. Just that they vary less.
Are you a woman, by chance? Would explain a lot.

Oh wait, there's more!

>Tissue was obtained from four women of 26, 31, 31, and 41 years of age and from four men of 24, 27, 32, and 36 years of age

The former paper explains the impact of age on neocortical neuron number and here even the tiny data is skewed towards men by their age.

But we arent. From our interests to our political opinions to our sexual fetishes and what we lookd for physically in women, it's all different.
Keep coping, you know this is bs

>>literally refutes your main point
>HA! Learn to read a results section, you monumental faggot.

The "main point" was that there is no (or little now that the goal posts keep moving) variation. If you didn't mean to defend that main point, you should have said this. I apologize for misinterpreting your post.

>sexual fetishes
>what we look for physically in women

why do men think that this shit is important or in any way indicative of a personality? yes, you're all slaves to your biology. we get it. that's practically the entire reason this board exists in the state that it does. here you have a forum for actually interesting discussion and you all spend the entire time talking about women, women, women.

Maybe stop having shit taste, you bland faggot.

What the fuck is this point? First of all, you ignore that we also differ more in interests and political opinions.
Secondly, your sexuality is the MOST fundamental part about you - to claim it's not indicative of a personality is ridiculous. You aren't the first femanon I've talked to about this who said this same thing, which further proves my point.
Also, everyone likes sex, men and women like it equally. Everyone is a 'slave to their biology' in that sense. How does that mean anything to the point where men are more varied in their fetishes and physical attraction in women whereas women all want the SAME guy (both in looks and personality)?

>From our interests to our political opinions to our sexual fetishes and what we lookd for physically in women, it's all different.
not really, see my original post id love to waste more time arguing but alas i gotta go to work

are you the same guy that did the thread about how women shouldn't be able to vote because they like to be submissive

But that's a SUBSET of men - soyboy leftist cucks. Not even close to indicative of the set of all men, unlike what I'm saying about women.

I've made that argument before, but there are a bunch of people that do so I don't know.