Why are women so motherfucking obsessed with the idea that lust and love are NECESSARILY mutually exclusives?

Why are women so motherfucking obsessed with the idea that lust and love are NECESSARILY mutually exclusives?

Attached: 1513837540270.jpg (737x620, 191K)

Because they can't comprehend love. There are 3 reasons they have sex.
1: Self pleasure.
2: To get something out of a man. (such as money)
3: The instinct to reproduce.

>inb4 100's of virgin replies

>still uses virgin as an insult
>on Jow Forums of all places

Attached: 1523706640466.jpg (520x442, 65K)

Because women aren't able to love. They confuse love with stability and security in a relationship. Love and sex are separate to them because the guys they claim to "love" aren't sexually appealing to them at all, they're just providers that get exploited. Women's brains are just too underdeveloped to form relationships that aren't shallow or completely one-sided in their favor.

It's becoming more and more frequent, along with incel. This board is changing before our very eyes

it's from thinking in extremes
>naive whores think sex+affection+romance=love
>"good" girls think responsibility+stability+nice+romance=love
Probably what they don't realize, and the reason that whores get spontaneously pregnant with their on again off again boyfriends and the reason "good" girls cheat on their boyfriends, is that you need a little bit of both sides. You want to be able to act like a slut in bed and be able to rely on each other in life situations.

The irony of your post is that a women will ruin a multiple year long relationship because she can't differentiate lust from love and thinks that the twinge in their wet hole from looking at someone attractive means that they're with the wrong person. You see it a million times a day all over the internet.

I love my best friend, but I LOVE My boyfriend. My best friend is a soulmate to me. My boyfriend is a romantic partner. I tell my best friend everything. Things that I don't feel comfortable discussing with my boyfriend. I have had showered at my best friend's house and dressed in front of him. I have had hugged him so tight that he can feel my boobs press against him and I can feel his boner press against me. I've showed him old nude pictures of me that I have sent to old boyfriends. My boyfriend found out about this and got mad. He got me to confess to cheating even though I didn't. I told him that my friend and I have never had sex or kissed. He ended up breaking up with me because he didn't want to be with me if I was okay with showing my naked body to my best friend and cuddling him.

>My best friend is a soulmate to me. My boyfriend is a romantic partner.

Attached: 1521337149896.jpg (645x773, 73K)

Unless your friend is an actual faggot you're going to find him swinging in his closet someday.

Heh,i had a female friend like this.She was the most important person in my life,no one understanded her like me,she was my only real friend.But when we went our seperate ways into uni she changed,i wasnt important to her as much as she was to me.Yet i still hope for the day she comes and embraces me like before.

Because a guy who wants to fuck me out of lust would just be looking to get off and probably wouldn't be concerned about whether or not I enjoyed it.

A man who loves me has taken the time to get to know my body and knows how to make me cum easily and repeatedly.

Who would love something like you?

You bitches are just trying to win a game that you can't win. There's nothing to figure out.

The guy I've been dating for the last nine months.

The guy who sleeps over 3-4 nights a week, every night we lie to each other, "we're going straight to sleep tonight, we have to get up early in the morning," only to end up screwing until 2 am.

No one loves something like you.

Attached: 1484689678192.jpg (480x480, 34K)

The point of this thread is about women that think that love and lust are necessarily mutually exclusives.

Emphasis in "necessarily mutually exclusives"

I'm sorry you're at a point in life where your sole source of comfort is projecting your own bad feelings onto others. Hope the (You)s give you a bleak sliver of solace.

Attached: feelings.jpg (720x261, 133K)

I am having a hard time reading what OP wrote, since it doesn't seem to be grammatically correct, but I don't think I was wrong in asking my question, even if it was off-topic. I simply wanted to know what a woman thought love was and it was just more lust.

And all I'm saying is that for those of us who feel that way, there's a reason. For those of us who want to enjoy sex and don't purely get off on the attention from having some random make us feel pretty, we're more likely to have satisfying experiences with men who love us and know our bodies and how to get us off.

As you can see, love doesn't even register to the female mind. Lust is all they need. Love is simply a term used for lust they approve of.

Because what is love without lust?
Two hearts with accurate devotions
And what are feelings without emotions?

>what is love without lust
More evidence.
It seems to be a common sentiment among posters. I believe there is confusion on this separate emotion. We know females cannot feel love, but maybe some males have bitten into a female perspective on love? It's like having a limited vocabulary, which I am very fond of.
All I feel is pity for us all. Those of us who feel it in our hearts and must endure it alone, and those who think they know it and are proud of their ignorance.

My partner prioritizes my pleasure and I prioritize his because we love each other and want to make each other feel as good as possible when we have sex.

Outside of sex, we want to make each other as happy as possible in general.

That's the nature of sex in love vs sex in lust. Love means putting the other person's needs ahead of your own (on both sides). Lust is self-seeking.

>Outside of sex, we want to make each other as happy as possible in general.

The lack of any information attached to this sentence shows the one-sidedness that love truly is.

I pray for his soul. I hope he's not torn to shreds. May salvation reach him when the next branch is grabbed.

Nah, I bet it's just tumbler or reedit traffic spiking.