I'm not a pedo but don't you just find some little girls to be insanely sexy?

Nigga that shit's toddlercon, the hell is wrong with you

Seriously dude, you're the worst kind of human.
You're worse than the incels

kill yourself

The girls in the OP are both over 18.

Attached: 1502707814407.jpg (1280x720, 111K)

Not sexy, but cute. Insanely cute, which just triggers my fatherly and brotherly instinct to make love to them passionately and teach them good sexual practice for when they are older, as well as form a closer bond.

Attached: 1524415402307.png (960x640, 1.08M)

kill yourself, pedo.
origiralio

No :)
"S-stop liking what I don't like".
God imagine being this normie.

Attached: 233be9ee42f76d81b415db584d947b0ca6a9e822.jpg (688x971, 89K)

No. For fucks sake no.

Thanks for posting my wife.
There's nothing wrong with good taste

>implying he's a pedo for liking an of-age girl with a young body

This shit is creepy af

Only 2d, familia

Well they are, it's nothing to do with being a pedo. Saying little girls aren't sexy is like saying Chad isn't sexy. It's an objective lie

Attached: 06_06.jpg (3464x2488, 1.68M)

I'm not a pedo but I'm attracted to Agatha

Attached: 1519404309581.jpg (1024x640, 100K)

this. It is retarded to think that loli body = pedofile

I only like lolis in 2d irl it's just gross

Most sexual attractiveness is subjective, but there's an exception for pedophiles and ("lolicons"). Sexuality is based on ability to reproduce, and so finding a prepubescent girl attractive is like finding a toaster attractive. They're both objects which you can stick your dick into with no discernible reproducing benefits.

Another thing: girls prepubescent are generally psychologically naive and innocent, and to put them into any sexual situation before they are ready is severely damaging on a long term basis.

Ultimately men are attracted to women with whom they can mate. Pedophiles are attracted to females not yet capable of reproducing, and so their fetish is pointless and universally regarded as sick.

Anime cartoons (which are already paedo given the big eyes and what not) of little girls in sexual situations are inherently paedophilia.

>Pedophiles are attracted to females not yet capable of reproducing
Wait, so you're saying there's a way of reproducing with 2D girls?

I'm not a pedo but I like how pedo threads bring out this board's inner reddit.

They also trigger ugly, impure roasties like you

>not pedo
>little girls
>sexy
This is your brain on an*me.

I take it using a condom is universally regarded is sick too? Stop lying to yourself.

Next your going to tell me that chad isn't sexy because you're straight?

They're very clearly depicted to be sexy in the image though. you're the one with the malfunctioning brain here.

Exactly you fucking retard. In Op's an*me pic it shows little girls to be sexy on purpose hence your brain on an*me makes you think little girls are sexy.

How do cartoons make you think little girls are sexy?

You do know that most child molesters are chads and probably haven't watched a second of anime in their lives, right?

Explain that.

having the option to reproduce
You're retarded but you accidentally raise a good point: what about the gays?

Addendum: attracted to someone whom if you could reproduce with them you would. So this eliminates anyone just attracted to a small body type (which is still weird because that's genetically unfit). If the attractive thing about a little girl to you is that fact that she is is young, then you're a pedophile

What if you just like long hair and you see a little girl with long hair and think she looks sexy? Does that make you a pedophile?

>How do cartoons make you think little girls are sexy?
>They're very clearly depicted to be sexy in the image though
Also do you have nay proof most child molesters are chads? Btw you're changing the subject because we are talking about pedos not child molesters and most pedos aren't child molesters and are an*me watchers.

>implying it's ok to fuck 10 year olds that have had their first period
thanks?

Little/petite adult girls are the only kind of girl I'd date and marry.
Literal children are disgusting and annoying.

Attached: 1501849267782.jpg (561x785, 63K)

I'm sorry, I'd love to argue with you since you seem like a sensible dude overall.
But I've just never understood how people can group 2D porn and real life pornography under the same umbrella, it's just insane to me.

The fact that so many people think that people who jerk off to anime characters is interested in assaulting real, living people is ludicrous, it's a leap of logic that has never been remotely true in any circumstances.

It's the exact same schtick as the baby boomer politicians who claimed video games cause mass shooters, it really is.

Attached: 1494314414137.gif (220x220, 1.85M)

They are mostly chads, look up Jimmy Saville.

Why are you so angry then if anime watchers aren't child molesters.

>falling for the obvious bait
Incels are robots
inb4 I fell for double-layered bait

Attached: wojakar.png (402x409, 123K)

What about a girl who is 12, but already developed. Periods, good legs, small boobies, and a face that is somewhat adultish, but still retains the innocent look of a child.

So is one person meant to convince me that most pedos are chads? Face it, the majority of pedos are an*me watchers, anyone who browsers this site knows this to be true.

*and mind

Cause an*me is gross and most people hate pedos so it's an easy argument to use to convince people.

What's the problem if all they're doing is jerking off to drawings?

Every lolicon I know claimed they don't care about real kids, why should I not believe them? after all I jerk off exclusively to 2D porn and have no sympathy for men who harm women and children irl.

Attached: yoko.jpg (320x320, 82K)

So basically you call anime watchers pedos because you don't like them?

Quality reasoning, right there, maybe I should claim all Jow Forumstards are pedos, then maybe they'll fuck off.

see
I don't like an*me and enjoy bullying people who do.

Yeah basically fuck an*me

I wouldn't say I find them sexy. But I do find the bodies of girls ages 5-10 to be very aesthetically pleasing. The smooth unblemished skin, the long coltish legs, the soft, slightly rounded features. It's a great look.

Finding a prepubescent girl sexually attractive generally discerns one's self as a pedophile, yes. If you're saying you find the hair sexy, I can understand since men routinely pick up on certain distinguishing sexual features of a woman while leaving other parts out (butter faces, etc.), but usually little girls are unsexually appealing that even if they did have one appealing feature it wouldn't be picked up on because the man wouldn't be looking for it on a little girl.
You'd have to be in a very specific situation to know exactly when her first period was, and unfortunately a lot of predators are in such familiar positions. Otherwise on the outside you would only be able to infer based on: breast development, hip development, voice development, visible pubic hair, etc.
I would not make an argument allegorical to boomer politicians. I would however argue that neither violent videogames or loli porn are beneficial to society, as they are both representations of vile ideas. Neither does it mean that just because it doesn't hurt anyone by its very existence, doesn't mean that its existence doesn't give some illogical justification to someone deranged. Slippery slope and all that.

By the way I wouldn't advocate making loli porn illegal, because having the OPTION to have the IDEA of such a distasteful act should not be infringed.

I love lolis desu senpai

Attached: 1298342%20-%20Annie_of_the_stars%20Skullgirls[1].jpg (800x760, 336K)

>yo do you get periods?
>yes
Wow what an unlikely situation. You didn't answer the question btw

children are sovereign individuals who are capable of sexual agency and should have the right to legally engage in consensual physical relationships with partners of any age

>thanks?
>question
I think we have different definitions of questions.

Also I want to see a phone video of an autist going up to a little girl and asking if she gets periods, and him subsequently getting v&

The question is if it's ok to think little girls are sexy after they've had their period. I dunno maybe you see a blood stain on their short shorts or something.

It might feel like I'm reaching here because I am because I didn't say this earlier, but a girl is not post-pubescent directly after getting her period for the first time, in fact she is only then pubescent.
Attraction to a pubescent girl ranges as variably as the men perceiving her, so sure it's okay to find her attractive. However seeing a bloodstain or whatever isn't going to make it or break it for a pedophile vs. a "normal," it's just one feature. Some girls get their periods and then tits, others the converse. Pubescence is a gray area, and that's why there's an arbitrary "age of consent" which is a long time after sexual development has plateaued.

The above probably isn't satisfactory. If a girl looks like a little girl and she bleeds, no it's not okay to find her sexy. If a girl looks somewhat like a teenager (bosom, hips, ass, etc.) and she bleeds, yes, it's okay to find her sexy.

I'll surrender this: there are few, (and only because they are visibly overdeveloped), pubescent girls who are sexy.

I try to give cute preteen girls special attention when I can. I like to groom children.
I used to be open about my feelings and I gave a 7 year old girl foot massage but I've been in a shell lately and this girl hugged me when she came to visit and I couldn't hug back because I'm worried about what people might think.
Somebody save me, man. I want to be free.

>Sexuality is based on ability to reproduce, and so finding a prepubescent girl attractive is like finding a toaster attractive.
What about those 40 year old (((MILFs)))?