He's right u know

Greek and Roman culture are part of English history and culture you uneducated retard.
Rome had settlements in Britain.
Then later Christianity was brought to England.
The reason you can type the shit you are typing is be ause of the industrial revolution started in England by the English.

Anglos refuse to get with the times and use bidets. They're walking around with shitty booties.

This is true. I'm not proud to be whit, and I don't care about what color my great great grandchildren will be.

Jow Forums truly is a silly place
imagine being so socially inept and hostile that you can't even post on other Jow Forums boards

Imagine being so retarded that you think Jordan Peterson is anything but a dumbfuck hack pandering to braindead reactionaries

>wanting an estrogen enema machine

Anglos created the modern world. This is the most advanced we have ever been and we have the highest living standards thanks to anglos. Praise anglos.

>retards thinking I'm insulting Anglos
I'm saying taking pride in things another culture has done because you're the same color is stupid, you morons. Why are you defining yourself by things another group of people has done? Have you accomplished so little that you need to look at the accomplishments of people from over 1,000 years ago who would probably feel ashamed share an ethnicity with you to feel good?

Anglos don't take pride in greece or rome. We take pride in what we as an ethnic group have accomplished. You understand anglo means english right? Why would english people not be proud of our own people because you say so?

When I said Anglos, I meant Anglos as an ethnicity, meaning the descendants of Anglos who now live in America and love taking pride in all of the scholars and scientists who come from countries that have nothing to do with them. You would be surprised with how many white Americans of English descent try to take credit for things Italians or Greeks or Germans have done.

if you lock your doors at night and would be upset if someone broke into your house and killed you it means you are irrationally proud of people who live in your house and you are a bad person. there is absolutely no other reason beyond stupid baseless pride for why you wouldn't allow people to break into your house and kill you. none at all. it's just idiotic pride and nothing else.

>braindead reactionaries
Preaching personal responsibility and denouncing collectivist thought is now reactionary? /leftypol/ shilling at full swing this afternoon.

Attached: 1515082689090.jpg (800x800, 42K)

>personal responsibility
>da evil marxist are keeping da white autist male down

>denouncing collectivist thought
in favor of braindead traditionalism i.e. telling white spergs like you what they wanna hear

People in america are irish and german, inbred, not anglo. And they take pride in american history, not even german, irish or anglo one.

>>da evil marxist are keeping da white autist male down
Who are you quoting?

Jordan Dumbfuckson

Ah right, for a second there I thought you weren't creating a strawman.

People in America are Irish and German despite speaking English, having their war of independence with England and the majority of white Americans have English surnames. Sure bud.

And you're fucking lying if you think American white nationalists don't try and take credit for the accomplishments of Europeans.

Nigga Peterson has an IQ of 150, is it possible that you are the dumbfuck and are incapable of grasping the concepts he pulls together?

how is it a strawman when it's pretty much what he's preaching?

traditional hierarchy = good

you, my white anti-SJW followers would be at the top of said hierarchy if not for those evil neomarxist liberals

when someone continuously says the dumbest shit imaginable I conclude that he must be a dumbfuck

it's possible he's playing a character to pander to people like you but that would make him a piece of shit nonetheless

Those who are never accomplish anything say taking pride in your own race is dumb.

Yeah, this rich and famous college professor/author/daddy to millionaire of fatherless dweebs has clearly never accomplished anything.

He's telling young men to fix their lives and stand tall like they should against the collectivist nature of today's society, he isn't telling young men to cry victimhood and make no effort to improve themselves.
You dismiss me as being white despite my anonymity, are you too used to r*ddit usernames?

Which is why he's against people taking pride in things they've never acomplished, retard.

>neomarxists are at the top of the hierarchy
No, they're not, and all he's saying is that the ideology of HR drones/liberal arts majors/future Starbucks Batista's killed more people than Hitler. That French academics discovered the gulags, realized that no one was going to buy their bullshit anymore, and instead of economic restructuring they made it about social and gender restructuring/oppression. He's simply saying that its a dangerous ideology that is rearing its head, and has nothing to do with accusations of a neomarxist conspiracy at the top of government or whatever hierarchy. Although for sure its really prevalent in academia.
>I can conclude
I can safely conclude that you are the dumbfuck. Try not pulling out a strawman. He literally has a tested IQ of 150 and you're calling him stupid because you can't grasp the concepts he pulls together

I never said he doesn't peddle self help shit too, but his overall message is multi layered. The evil leftists are keeping you down, improve yourself nonetheless.

>misrepresents transgender laws to fear monger his brainless followers
>peddles religion
>pushes insane social conservitism
>tries to make himself look like the victim by talking about compelled speech, muh free speech, etc

he is pushing a victim mentality onto his followers

Race is distinguished by color alone.
>He's also clinically retarded as evidenced by these posts. Coincidence?
This user is right, whoever that is, is retarded.

>he is pushing a victim mentality onto his followers
Going to need a sauce for that. That statement is more loaded with shit than your asshole.

>Race is distinguished by color alone.
meant to type it in greentext.

>He literally has a tested IQ of 150 and you're calling him stupid because you can't grasp the concepts he pulls together
you dumb fucking sihthead

he literally said you can't produce art without religion. he said banning makeup in the workplace might be the solution to sexual assault. he said women can't be controlled without violence. how many more braindead/insane statements do you need to conclude this guy is a dumbfuck and a nut?

He is, but "white nationalism" is just a way to convince retards to fight against globalization since the side that is for it have a "white guilt" policy...

I just gave you tons of evidence for that. Here is one of many examples of him playing the victim

youtu.be/b8AcmzqFdPM?t=37s

You call them insane, I call them reasonable.
You'll feel a lot better when you come out of the cave and realise that the boogeyman is just your own shadow, but until then, anything you disagree with is insane and should be considered insane to others.

This is just a bold attempt to sever the connections between white individuals and the societies that (formerly) nurtured them.

If the accomplishments of ancestors aren't important, Peterson should give his estate to charity instread of his children.

No, his message is not that evil leftists are keeping anything down, anymore than his message being that neonazis are keeping you down. You do know he dedicates a substantial amount of time in his academic lectures to the holocaust and Nazis as well, right?
His entire point is the average capacity for evil in a human being. Everyone has this capacity, the capacity to justify evil or just not give a fuck.
You think you know what he's talking about because you saw him complain about a fascist Canadian law and rightly blame neomarxists for it.
Go actually listen to his lectures and understand what he's saying instead of being a fucking retard, you crybaby.

It follows that whites are the most accomplished people, since they are the least proud of their own race. Based Peterstein!

Attached: 1442803546114.gif (499x256, 141K)

>He literally has a tested IQ of 150
Do you know what IQ equal to 150 would mean? If ANYONE had IQ of 150, hell, even 140, they would be geniuses. Litteral, Tesla-tier geniuses.
(Not the type of "look at my smart twitter posts, I am such a genius boy).

>You call them insane, I call them reasonable.
ok so you're just as much of a dumbfuck

why didn't you say you're an insane retard from the start?

>You can't be prideful over what your race has accomplished throughout history.
Oh boy, sounds like the Africans are getting jealous.

Attached: SataniasEvilAura.jpg (1920x1977, 1.04M)

Source for all of these statements instead of pulling them out of your ass, please

Yeah, no shit idiot.

>I just gave you tons of evidence for that.
>Being this new he isn't used to anonymous posts
The "evidence" you provided is made by a blubbering retard, literally calling supporters of Peterson far right. How about you actually post a quote of something Peterson has said rather than some literally-who e-celeb?

>anyone I disagree with is insane.
Is self-awareness too difficult of a concept for you to grasp? I predicted exactly what you will label me and I was completely correct.

oh god

this won't get us anywhere but fine

>Jordan Peterson: Without Religion There's No Art & Poetry
youtu.be/aw1jtOiPzB0?t=1m41s

>Makeup in the workplace
youtu.be/9FfoLrGKHfI

>Can't control women without violence
youtu.be/dL3Hrwg3A3w

What else am I supposed to call you? You think banning makeup in the workplace is a reasonable way to fight sexual assault? You think religion is a requirement for creating art? Do you comprehend how insane those statements are?

Still, doesn't mean we should import millions of third worlders into Europe.

Even if you're not an ethnonationalist, there's literally no good reason to allow third worlders in.

He's right. We have no right to feel proud about the accomplishments of our race. But if we do not, there is no cohesion, and there is only self-hatred. As silly as it is to take pride in someone else's accomplishments in any way, it's the only feasible way to organize. You can apply this logic to almost any group; without any pride in the 'us' people have no real reason to be in the 'us'.

No, it means that he's the smartest motherfucker in a randomly selected group of 1000 people. Learn what IQ scoring is, faggot.

>>Without Religion There's No Art & Poetry
Name me a competently-written poem written by someone with no influence from religion, I'll wait.
>>Makeup in the workplace
Absolutely correct. Watch the full, unedited interview. Makeup is a tool of attraction, he is arguing that SJWs should stick to their principles and ban makeup if they don't want the workplace to be a sexual environment. He is not advocating for sexual assault in the workplace.

>>Can't control women without violence
The title itself says "crazy women", unless you're saying that all women are crazy, you really are grasping at straws here.

The point is not that I am taking pride in the accomplishments of my racial brethren, it's that modern, accomplished, advanced societies have only been created by whites and East Asians. If we don't recognize this fact then there's no reason for us to care about demographics and as such we will simply be a 2nd-world shopping mall disguised as a country. Our accomplishments will become rarer and rarer as we yearn for a time when this country actually stood as a shining example to others, and we will be forbidden from even noticing that this time occurred with a white majority.

>No, it means that he's the smartest motherfucker

t. Jordan

>not even quoting the full sentence
Your reading comprehension can't be that bad, can it?

Did not wanted to make you blush with that retarded part that you wrote there:

> in a randomly selected group of 1000 people
If you really think that if you take 1k random people and one of them will have IQ of 150 yours must be double digit.

>can't control women without violence
Man you really are retarded. Peterson was talking about the double-standard in engaging in violence between men and women.

>makeup in the workplace
Again, talking about the double-standard between men and women that women are allowed to be sexually provocative and men are not without being litigated against.
This all boils down to you intentionally misunderstanding him because you don't like the other things he says.

Context for the first one is that you'd lose a substantial amount of art and poetry, not that art and poetry would not exist without religion, you fucking retard.
He didn't say that banning makeup would be the solution o sexual assault, or that makeup justifies sexual assault, he said that makeup is sexually provocative, and that's 100% a fact.
You wasted my time by spinning random bullshit, kill yourself, I'm not going to even continue to entertain you. You're yet another asshurt dipshit who probably got triggered over the fact that he didn't want the government to regulate pronouns and you spin and twist his words to make him look bad.
You're a dishonest piece of shit, fuck off, have some empathy and quit wasting other people's time by making shit up.

you are beyond braindead

>Name me a competently-written poem written by someone with no influence from religion, I'll wait.

watch the quote you fucktard, literally listen to what he said. don't try to move the goalpost. people are influenced by their environment, that's a fact. that's not what dumbfuckson was saying.

>Absolutely correct. Watch the full, unedited interview. Makeup is a tool of attraction, he is arguing that SJWs should stick to their principles and ban makeup if they don't want the workplace to be a sexual environment. He is not advocating for sexual assault in the workplace.

He is advocating an illogical and needlessly cruel punishment that makes absolutely no sense and is only there to make people like you feel better about themselves

>why do women wear makeup

Why do men wear deodorant? Why do men wear trousers at work? How about everyone just wears masks so we don't know what they look like you moron? Also how do you they're trying to make themselves attractive to you? What if they're doing it for someone else? That gives you the right to sexually assault them? Everything he says is nonsense.

>The title itself says "crazy women", unless you're saying that all women are crazy, you really are grasping at straws here.
no his statements have a very clear implication. you can't control women(crazy or not) without violence. he's upset that it's not as socially acceptable to beat women who piss of him like it is men. not that he could beat anyone up.

>those who have accomplished anything have no need to feel proud when their sport team wins
he's a true brainlet

>had to check if i was on pol

oy vey listen to DOCTOR juden peterstein goys, he's a DOCTOR so you should listen to him.

Attached: 1525041978249.jpg (1200x1466, 200K)

That is literally how IQ scoring works. Its a bell curve, dumbass.

Pride is a natural feeling that can also be experienced vicariously, not a choice you make.

Attached: 1518497270338.png (1083x865, 516K)

>move the goalpost. people are influenced
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA this quarter brain thinks that the bell curve works on anything IRL and is not
purely theoretical. Damn you really must have a double digit IQ.

>Context for the first one is that you'd lose a substantial amount of art and poetry, not that art and poetry would not exist without religion, you fucking retard.
he said you would lose all art and poetry and later went on to say that atheists poets and painters secretly believe in a god, they just don't know it. he is an absolute dumbfuck and so are you for defending him. get lost you emotional, reactionary fucktard.

>don't try to move the goalpost.
The goalpost has not shifted because I agree with what he is saying.
>He is advocating an illogical and needlessly cruel punishment
Not wearing makeup is a cruel punishment? Well aren't you a spwecial little pwincess?
>>why do women wear makeup
I know why women wear makeup, which is why you're retarded for quoting something I've never said.
>Why do men wear deodorant?
Body odour, same with women. Smell is a completely different sense than sight.
>Why do men wear trousers at work?
A suit, tie, trousers is the standard workplace uniform for an office environment.
>How about everyone just wears masks so we don't know what they look like you moron?
Never argued for that, I argued against make up. You're grasping at straws trying to find new ways to strawman me.
>no his statements have a very clear implication
For a shrieking feminist I wouldn't expect you to call all women crazy.

Wait wrong quote. Meant to take this into greentext:
>Its a bell curve, dumbass.

He brings up a good point. What do whitr nationalists think of 75% white but 25% black people? Are they white?

>he literally said you can't produce art without religion
art is externalization of repressed urges one feels under such systems as religions. he also notably stated that ideology is a degenerate form of religion, which is true.
>he said banning makeup in the workplace might be the solution to sexual assault
Why can't it be considered as one of the options? What fundamental rights are taken from anyone by banning makeup. Men effectively can't wear makeup in professional settings.
>he said women can't be controlled without violence
control is performed by violence or implicit/explicit threat of violence. this is universal.

Nigga you are fucking stupid, also he scored 150 in his 20s, which means he's probably around 130 considering your IQ score declines as you age and based on the fact that other people get smarter. Again, bell curve scoring.

>The goalpost has not shifted because I agree with what he is saying.
And I'm saying you're a moron and an insane retard.

>Not wearing makeup is a cruel punishment? Well aren't you a spwecial little pwince
It's a cruel punishment in response to sexual assault. Men can't help themselves but sexually assault you? Must be your fault, make yourself less attractive. Why don't we just handcuff all men during break hours instead? Makes just as much sense.

>Never argued for that, I argued against make up.

Why? Why aren't you arguing that people be as ugly and hideous as possible? Why stop at makeup?

>needlessly cruel
>banning of makeup
What more evidence can one give that roasties offer nothing besides their looks

The only reactionary where is you, you waste other people's time by twisting words and taking things out of context.

>Why? Why aren't you arguing that people be as ugly and hideous as possible? Why stop at makeup?
>slippery slope
Because all other forms of making people ugly aren't as clean/painless to implement.

>directly quoting what the retard said is taking him out of context

it always comes down to this with peterson zombies. No, he wasn't taken out of context. He just has a habit of saying very stupid things. The audience literally burst out in laughter when he said everyone is secretly religious. He is an absolute moron and you are a brainwashed scumbag.

>And I'm saying you're a moron and an insane retard.
Oh it's another "everyone I disagree with is insane". Come out of the cave and see for yourself.
>It's a cruel punishment in response to sexual assault.
All punishments are a preventative measure, but not all preventative measures are punishments. Makeup has no use in a professional environment and therefore should not be worn.
>Why aren't you arguing that people be as ugly and hideous as possible?
Look at yourself, you actually want me to become a strawman for you to attack, and yet you call me insane. Absolutely pathetic.

Attached: 1514996304249.jpg (251x242, 15K)

But why do you need to make them ugly in the first place? Are you also in favor of turning away all naturally good looking women lest they be sexually harassed? Only hire the really ugly ones? Are you seriously this dumb dude? Don't you want society to be better as a whole?

>he literally said all this ridiculous stuff that he obviously never said why don't you hate him!?
Jesus Christ you people are pathetic.

Atheists are objectively wrong anyways. They deliberately ignore the truth about subjectivity.

I posted video evidence of him saying all that, zombie retard. Holy shit you faggots will literally deny things happened even after explicit evidence of them happening is presented. You literally are a cult.

Other anons already explained why you are wrong you retarded ape.

Can't tell if this post is a parody or not.

No they didn't. They literally doubled down on what dumbfuckson was saying.

It's not. Peterson is right that if you possess a consciousness you aren't really atheist deep down.

>But if we do not, there is no cohesion, and there is only self-hatred
keep yourself out of this

Now you're arguing entirely based on feelings. How can you prove I'm actually religious deep down?

See these posts
Fucking original content

Cause deep down you accept the reality of subjective experience. You only convinced yourself in atheism from worshipping language and science.

>objective
>posts opinions

k

Attached: 1421725336436.jpg (540x703, 213K)

Accepting that subjectivity is a thing doesn't make you religious. Prove to me that I'm secretly religious deep down.

Cause subjectivity can't exist without consciousness being part of the universe at the base level.

Are you quoting your own posts? Both make braindead points and don't really put the things he said in context, in fact just double down on them and make them even more insane.