>bro if you don't eat carbs your body will burn fat for energy
Where did this bullshit keto meme come from?
Even if your diet is 100% fats and protein they'll still turn into glucose meaning it doesn't matter whether you eat 30% carbs or 0% carbs in terms of fat loss speed.
en.wikipedia.org
Fucking keto has turned into a cult dumber than veganism.
Yes.
The body will turn the excess fat into as much glucose as it needs but mostly ketones.
That's kind of how it works.
Any diet that relies on removing a food group or macro but maintaining bare minimum protein will result in weight loss.
>what is insulin sensitivity
>what is leptin induced lipolisys
>what is fasting
Think for more than a minute before calling something a fad
I've read extensively about fasting and I fully promote it but conflating fasting with keto (like that sensationalist Dr Fung does) is scientifically inaccurate.
You're spouting buzzwords - there is zero evidence that insulin changes between a zero carb diet and a moderate carb diet has any effect on body composition.
You can still eat moderate carbs and lose fat at the same rate as keto.
>You're spouting buzzwords - there is zero evidence that insulin changes between a zero carb diet and a moderate carb diet has any effect on body composition.
That's fucking wrong.
That's fucking stupid dangeorusly misleading and outright fucking wrong.
It's partly accurate but for reasons that have little to do with biology: a low carb diet reduces hunger, that's it, you can't take this piece of information and conclude that low-carb improves fat loss. That's a marketing gimmick you fell for.
If you compare exact same calorie diets with meals eaten at the exact same time, the body composition will remain the same. If this in new to you then you don't understand gluconeogenesis and should go back to watching YouTube video by broscience vloggers.
lmao no answer
You end up full from proteins/fat than from carbs. So you end up eating less.
Also
Sorry but appetite shouldn't be a factor when we;re discussing biological mechanisms. If you're obese that's your problem.
Aw, look, it's retarded
keto sounds dumb lol
>You can still eat moderate carbs and lose fat at the same rate as keto.
Of course you can, but the point is that it's easier (for a lot of people) to eat less calories via keto.
>fat loss speed
>appetite shouldn't be a factor
>le goalpost moving
fuck off with this bullshit
Ketones are bad for the brain
>If you're obese that's your problem.
>If you follow this diet because it helps you maintain a sustained calorie deficit and lose weight you're an idiot.
Shut the hell up user. Some of us have to work to lose weight.
>there is zero evidence that insulin changes between a zero carb diet and a moderate carb diet has any effect on body composition.
This is bait, right?
How can appetite be a factor if calories are kept the same you mongoloid?
Again, we're talking about body composition when calories are constant. You can't compare two diets but not keep the calorie intake constant.
You are all scientifically illiterate.
>it doesn't matter whether you eat 30% carbs or 0% carbs in terms of fat loss speed.
The speed depends entirely of calories in calories out. If you're full with less calories, you're less prone to eat more of them, getting you there faster.
Science
That's a bit like saying "take cocaine in the morning and you'll lose weight faster".
To compare diets, you need to keep EVERYTHING ELSE constant. That means, calories, meal times, and anything else not relevant.
>take cocaine in the morning and you'll lose weight faster
but that's right
To compare diets people want to keep hungriness constant you mongolian. This way you also fullfill all you're protein needs
lol you're the retarded one though
i'm not even the user you replied to, but he's right, appetite is one of the factors, and it is absolutely true that lower carb intakes result in less hunger
this is basically one of the bigger reasons why keto/atkins diets are good for someone who has been eating too much food their entire life, basically. they need to relearn to control their appetite, which is why low carb diets are so popular.
That's fair but the claim ketofags make is that even if you eat the same you'll have less body fat on keto ("le CICO isn't real!")
Keto books claim that if calories are kept the same body composition changes to improve fat loss. This is a lie.
what are hormones
No hormone changes between 0% and 30% carb intake. You bought a meme diet, well done.
study?
Tbh eating carb would probably make you lose weight faster .
You need carb for intense exercice , even if high intensity burn less % fat than low intensity , the total amount of fat is still higher , but you need carbs for that , fat burn in the flame of the carbohydrate .
Sorry but you make a claim like "x produces change y" you're the one that has to provide a study. There is zero relationship between carbs and hormones just like there is zero relationship between carbs and hair growth, if you believe otherwise, you'll have to prove it.
ah ok