>neighbour gets a big expensive doggo
>can hear it's barking clearly and loudly
>"enough!" I said with an annoyance
>plan about sniping it with a 50.cal airsoft
>inspect them for 8 days
>(((they))) sleep at 12am and keep the doggo at garden
>"perfect!" because I can snipe it from my rooftop
>day before sniping
>doggo gets loose
>runs away
>get stolen immediately
>never heard of him since a month
Should I snipe my neighbours?
Other urls found in this thread:
In case anyone forgot it's summer.
I'm 25 years old and I'm not allowed to touch any (gun) firearms.
Fuckin summer to (You), mate!
good bait, will surely get the dog lovers really mad
He was suffering just like the half of this board!
I decided to be the good man, is it too wrong?
>ist ganz klar dass English nicht deine Muttersprache ist
>hab schon ein Jahr lang Deutsch gelernt (in Deutschland sogar)
>muss jeden Tag mit Deutsche reden, wenn mein Deutsch schelchter als dein Englisch ist
>fucking peinlich
>niemand nimmt mich ernst
sorry for complaining, life aint even that bad with german (although i forget every other word I learn) but i wanted to try speaking so yeah xdd
cute pic btw and i wasnt trying tos ay your english is bad
Nigger, nothing is wrong with that level of English.
And yea, it's not my main language, in fact it's the 5th language that I can speak.
Butttt, there's one fatal mistake. I'm Russian, not German!
And my German is not that good, worse than my English and probably much worse than yours.
>i wasnt trying tos ay your english is bad
Kay, meanie.
Assuming this isn't some edgy summer idea of bait, forensics teams can easily tell the direction a bullet came from.
But I refuse.
I served in the military for two years, I know how to fake it!
For sniping humans tho, I can't probably cover it or fake it.
Ahhhhh. I saw the a with an umlaut in the title so I assumed you had a German keyboard.
And yeah, the English level was fine, but you made a lot of mistakes such as "at garden" when (I think) you meant "in the garden".
It's perfectly readable, but you do make mistakes (I can correct them for you if you want and explain what's up)
>German keyboard
Close enough, I'm using a EU layout keyboard with a Russian one alongside.
>mistakes such as "at garden"
"At the garden side" would not be a mistake, because I've heard it before.
>I can correct them for you
Kay, that would be perfekt, mein Nigger. But I do think about learning English at it's full meaning when I get some time.
There's no way they wouldn't figure out that the autistic neighbor shot the dog. At least if you gave it poisoned meat it might be slightly more difficult to pin it down, but even then.
>poisoned meat
Risky trick.
Sodium overdose is better.
Happened this morning:
>be autistic and don't like noise
>walking outside because can't study when noise
>car with lights off just sitting there with engine running
>it's 67 degrees freedom
>still there half hour later
>decide to spook them so they don't do it anymore
>get in my car, point it at them, flash brights
>go for short drive so battery doesn't die and car is gone when I return
>can hear it's barking clearly and loudly
This technically isn't incorrect, but people would MUCH more likely say "it barking" than "it's barking"
>"enough!" I said with an annoyance
This one doesn't make much sense, but it does remain clear that you're annoyed. To say something "with an annoyance" means that you're saying it as something annoying is with you, which is weird. An "annoyance" is something that is actively being annoying, and is not a feeling. Say "I said, annoyed" instead.
>plan about sniping it with a 50.cal airsoft
"Plan about" doesn't really mean anything. Say "plan to" instead.
>inspect them for 8 days
Inspecting a person pretty much means you're inspecting their body, which implies they're dead or you're a doctor. I guess you're trying to say that you watched them and observed what they were doing, but you should also say that you inspected what they were doing, rather than inspecting them (again, that implies you are doing stuff with their bodies).
>(((they))) sleep at 12am and keep the doggo at garden
"At the garden side" could be used in some rare circumstances, but not in this once. Anyway, 99% of English speakers are going to say "in the garden" here. "At garden" would always be wrong.
>get stolen immediately
*gets
>never heard of him since a month
Saying "never heard of him" in any context means that you do not know of the existence of the dog, and never have. "Since a month" is also wrong, it should be replaced with "for a month" or "in a month" depending on the context.
The sentence should read "Haven't heard anything from/about him in a month" or "haven't heard him in a month", depending on what you're trying to say.
I hope this helped. I was quite harsh (I always want people to be harsh with my German, so this is the attitude I take) but hopefully you learned something.
Also, your English is more than understandable. I'm sure you'd have no trouble in English speaking countries. ;)
>>be autistic and don't like noise
Use in-ear headphones, it acts as an passive noise blocker.
Comfy spook those, I bet those neigers learn'd their lesson.
I get contact dermatitis there but I'll try various plugs. My around-the-ear active noise canceling headphones resonate from the noise here right now.
>be me 8 years ago when 18
>walk past this lonesome house next to a main road on way to train station for work
>dog is always on their drive and shits me up when it barks
>get fed up of it
>cross over to grass verge to avoid it one day
>it crosses the road after me and almost gets hit by a van
>idea
>after a few days I get the courage to do the plan
>cross road to grass verge as car is coming
>stupid dog walks straight into the car and slides down the road, blood splattering from its face
Problem solved
>This technically isn't incorrect, but people would MUCH more likely say "it barking" than "it's barking"
Well it would be its with no apostrophe actually
>I can hear it barking
Means I hear the dog barking
>I can hear its barking
Means I can hear the barking that comes from the dog
>Inspecting a person pretty much means you're inspecting their body
Oh shit.
>*gets
A typo, sorry :3
That was helpful, I'll screenshot it for later use! Thanks a lot!
youtube.com
That's exactly how I think like. I guess, some people use the grammar of their first (mother) language.
Delicious dog blood, pefekt for environment.
I would have fed the dog homemade whole wheat peanut butter treats.
What are you talking about the apostrophe for?
And I know what you're saying. My point was that people refer to the dog barking as opposed to the bark of the dog.
No-one says "I can hear it's barking", they say "I can hear it barking"
Glad I could help, I will enjoy the musci :)
No, the apostrophe is used for the contraction "it is". You're saying "I can hear it is barking". The possessive form of its has no apostrophe.
>Be 9 year old me
>Some fools left their yard fence open, so their dogs got out
>They start barking at my house for no reason
>My nearly deaf dog hears this
>We have to give the owners money over their deceased dogs
Nope. This is disputed (no solid rule backing either of us up) but neither are wrong. It's CAN be the possessive. (Although I didn't think of it as "it is" before)
Oh, I should note, the rule you're talking about is correct,but only for inanimate objects. Dogs can own stuff, so they also have a possessive apostrophe