Are females supposed to have human rights, or they should only be houseworing and baby producing male property...

I don't care about your "should". In the real world if you don't speak up as a woman you either get total incompetent service or get walked all over. "Should" doesn't exist in my vocabulary.

This, what is better for this environment is different from what was better for the environment we evolved in. We've had essentially no time to adapt.
Post proof that there's a direct correlation between symmetrical, attractive faces and intelligence.

You rephrase "being forced to do something good for society" with "get walked all over"?

I don't care about "society". I translate things into how they actually work in the real world according to my experiences. Yeah I should just be quiet when something can go wrong and just trust people to be competent. Nope. The world doesn't work this way. Plenty of incompetent and malicious people out there.

Oh it's you. How's the business going

>I don't care about "society".
Well, maybe people like you should be walked over?

>"Should" doesn't exist in my vocabulary.
That's a remarkably stupid thing you just said.

Attached: Hey-ladies-why-so-religious.jpg (982x661, 170K)

Not even the guy you were replying to but this is a pretty well documented phenomenon.

My less than educated guess as to why this is, is that people who are more attractive are obviously more genetically sound, therefor even their brains are more "complete" and unmutated.

Attached: Capture.jpg (734x832, 149K)

Even if it is true, there is a whole range of problems women rights bring.

I see no studies.
Post a study that positive correlates this with an r^2 rating about .5 or it's bullshit.

You need to quantify attractiveness first.

Not beauty as it relates to women. Didn't realize that was something that needed to be pointed out.

There's only five links there and you don't the one like that's a study?

So that just makes it even more difficult. If I were to quantify it, I'd say "symmetrical face" as that's the only real metric.
When I think of the greatest geniuses in history, none of them are especially attractive. Usually they're ugly or average.
In the end, this is all bullshit.

The research gate study doesn't actually prove shit. Read it:
researchgate.net/publication/222436245_Why_Beautiful_People_Are_More_Intelligent
It's literally just "well maybe intelligent men have sex with attractive women?" there's not even any data, just 4 assumptions and a bunch of bullshit.
Psychology, not even once.

Maybe this will help paint a better generalized picture for you since you can't seem to wrap your head around such a simple concept.

Attached: 1svlxx.jpg (848x500, 102K)

I guess you're right and rest of the world is wrong. Damn maybe you should be in Mensa, bro.

Attached: beautyintell.jpg (630x481, 52K)

This is meaningless lol
I'm in mensa already

not him but what's the point of this? chinks and japs are ugly af

You're in Mensa? And here I originally assumed you were the human equivalent of a goat. Well, professor go take up your argument with the academic world. I ain't dealing with this shit.

Well all the greatest philosophers in human history warn men not to give women rights.

>chinks are the most attractive people on the planet
yeah imma call bullshit on that

If women stopped working as of right now, the economy would collapse. Perhaps a better solution for better women is to raise children better. The majority of all problems stem from childhood. If you can't maintain a nuclear family, then involve aunts/uncles/cousins. Single parenting leads to bad outcomes the majority of the time, especially if it's a single mother. Best approach to society is to change the norm of the culture. As long as men enable bad behavior from women, nothing will change.

Here's a question, why have the right to vote at all?