Reminder that there is nothing more beta than a subhuman prey eye area. Fact

Reminder that there is nothing more beta than a subhuman prey eye area. Fact.

What makes an eye area attractive?

>Shape, vertically narrow and horizontally long
>Tilt, positive canthal tilt
>Eyebrows, low, long straight and thick
>Minimal eyelid exposure or fully hooded
>Interpupillary distance of .5 or over (ratio of pupil to pupil length divided by horizontal head length)
>Tear drop shaped medial canthus pointing down

color means shit. Post eyes and I will tell you how subhuman you are

Attached: 3c874844861550e6b21bba3fa7ec5cb3.jpg (1364x718, 303K)

Other urls found in this thread:

lookism.net/Thread-ideal-eye-separation-discovered-ITT-with-detailed-discussion
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>color means shit
Color is the most important thing you retard.
Brown eyed subhuman will never get laid

C O P E

you couldnt be more wrong. color could never save this poor subhuman

Attached: bJUblQi.png (720x1280, 1.07M)

How subhuman am I?

Attached: thousandyardstare.png (414x116, 81K)

I don't need anyone else to tell me something about myself.
I am my own best judge, and of course I know I am a subhuman objectively speaking even.

Whatever, reroll, redraw...

((( c o l o r ))) couldnt save this poor eyelet either.

this also isnt coming from a brown eye self hating ethnic. i have green eyes

Attached: 8e0f8c0257f97df6b39ed3ebacbc6d32.png (369x551, 311K)

The Good:

>minimal eyelid exposure
>low eyebrows
>Neutral tilt

The Bad:
>shape, squinch when you take pics.
>medial canthus (not that important)

Overall id say not subhuman but not model tier. could be worse user

Let's see what you've got OP

Attached: Screenshot_2018-06-12-00-42-39.png (1080x1920, 1.1M)

yeah whatever let's go

Attached: mye.jpg (480x640, 128K)

then why are med men the most desired by european women?

If epicanthic folded eyes are predator eyes does that mean all Asians are alpha?
>>>/Lookism/

retinal samples accepted. thank you

Attached: NSA.jpg (474x464, 48K)

not subhuman

not suhuman but i would learn to squinch in pictures

they were accepted a long time ago, assuming they have somewhat modern phones with front facing cameras

hi subhumans

Attached: 1520235582033.png (1440x972, 683K)

pls be my bf, origninal

Am I good bruh?

Attached: 3B2659DF-0972-4844-BBF9-8FB72C1EF2AA.jpg (1425x586, 158K)

discord?

extra originally

There is literally, and i mean literally by it's actual definition, nothing more subhuman than comparing yourself to animals

>Interpupillary distance of .5 or over (ratio of pupil to pupil length divided by horizontal head length)

Can you explain this one better? I can't see what you mean

>thousandyardstare
Lmao dude, you're not a war veteran. You're a loser who never leaves his room

It's a homo, retard

post other eye

Well OP? Are my eyes alright?

Attached: Image_588.jpg (262x89, 8K)

lookism.net/Thread-ideal-eye-separation-discovered-ITT-with-detailed-discussion

this is a serious warning. if you have bdd or you think you could develop it do not lurk this site

i leik bois 2

lel okii

Attached: 42ec596dc1db68a834ce21813877662f.png (428x144, 97K)

> this entire thread
Every time I start to think r9k can't get any more autistic.

Attached: feel-high.jpg (1200x1600, 127K)

The Good:
>Minimal eyelid exposure
>low thick brows
decent lashes

>The Bad:
slight negative tilt (not end of the world)
>medial canthus (not that important)

overall not subhuman but not model tier. you will be ight

very nice not subhuman at all

It's all in how you take it my guy. Not a very good squint, but illustrates my point. Same user as

Attached: Image_1010.jpg (366x116, 8K)

Shit chad, you look good. Kinda getting an eastern euro vibe

A lot of it is just outright wrong though. For example, that article you posted goes on about a lot of technical data but his point boils down to "close set eyes are ugly and beta and wide set eyes are good looking and alpha", and the only argument he has to actually support that is "i said so". The data he presents also seems to be pulled out of thin air.

Believe it or not but most of the posts there are just people trying to argue over why how they look is better than how everyone else looks. You'll see a lot of this back and forth where two sides of an opposing argument present equally valid "evidence" and no one ever ends up coming to an agreement because it's actually just made up or cherrypicked.

>i let people convince me I'm a subhuman because of my eye area

pretty beta desu

Attached: eID1jOj.jpg (1280x720, 318K)

very true user squinching is life

literally everyone agrees close set eyes are subhuman. look at how trash they look on this otherwise chad

Attached: close set eyes.jpg (266x320, 26K)

>Would participate in this thread but my fringe is so long it's in my eyes and I'm not getting a haircut until Thursday
At any rate this is all angle and expression desu

ok what about me
I think im close to an adonis

Attached: eyesrate.png (238x56, 36K)

What are you doing on this board you fucking norman?

I dont know but I feel comfy posting all now.

Attached: 3TN8o2J.png (400x400, 208K)

Extremes on both ends look bad. Regardless, the point here isn't that specific subject. It's that lookism is shit when it comes to subjects that aren't already well proven. It's just severely insecure people who come back because they developed some kind of a sick addiction to being shat on by other insecure losers, with a few failed Chads mixed in who are equally insecure and go there to shit on bottom of the barrel trash to feel better about themselves.

I have depression. My eye shows it.

Attached: 20180611_183454.jpg (934x448, 73K)

just scowl more not even kiddin the ones on the left are scowling

>Ching Chong eyes are better than round eye

Guess the atomic radiation is still effecting your brain a lil bit and confusing you

objectively wrong again

Okay some of these fucking shave to look like that I swear man. Most of us in here could probably shave to have those brows now that I think about it... hmmm.

Attached: image.png (346x327, 106K)