Naruto run to bus stop

you seem sad user

watch this vlad

youtube.com/watch?v=liEIiJvrFfc

some peoples taste in humor is objectively bad

You don't even know the meaning of objective.

ahhh nostalgia
miss watching naruto after school

don't worry user they probably forgot about that by now, just try not doing it again

thats literally a 4th grade vocabulary term most people know what it means

Then you would know that someone's tastes cannot be objectively bad.

There are people who unironically like this m.youtube.com/watch?v=KifgGKKfkuU

I would laugh too.

I remember a friend of mine did this in school circa 2012.
It was cringey af then and it's cringey af now.

Honestly, it'd be funny to see.

It's up to you if you're going to be offended or if you're gonna laugh at it along and have fun.

Then let me ask you what makes it objectively bad? Is it based on majority opinion, do you yourself decide, or is it some gut feeling that everybody with "good taste" have?

Wtf is Naruto run? is it just me?

Attached: 8xHaARsGUopHCMV30_zhn_klKWMjVQDgimyaANl-5uo.jpg (614x768, 180K)

this autistic shit

youtube.com/watch?v=ccaGRoLc4wU
runnin like naruto from naruto

You realize when you describe actions between asterisks it's just as bad as the naruto run right?

My friend used to do this, and he killed himself, rest in peace

Attached: sms-17466.jpg (600x400, 61K)

You know what OP? If they laugh at you, why don't you just run into them?

I don't get it, it's still subjective. Are you really doing the "Stop liking what I don't like" meme?

i dont care that people like it but dont act like it is impossible to have bad taste in things because people definitely do

And what makes someone's tastes objectively bad?

its extremely simple humor and jokes that are pretty much the same as really bad jokes that i have heard 13 year olds i babysit make

maybe stop acting like a little faggot and go to the gym

like very simple and dumb humor pretty much what i said here

Yeah I could think someone's taste is bad, but that wouldn't make it objectively bad?

if they like very simple,stupid and badly designed things then yes

And where does the objective part comes in? What you said falls under subjective.

Read this for reference

You fucking deserve it

And the people who decides what joke is badly designed comes from a subjective view.

>Dont do obvious shit like that but do autistic shit all the time in public without noticing until chad and stacy starts laughing

I was just not made for this world

Attached: 1525498964870.jpg (262x193, 11K)

You people are fucking stupid. Who decides what is poorly designed in a joke? The joke's sole purpose is to make people laugh that's all. Humor can never be objective, no one person's taste is better than another's.

some peoples views are objectively bad like,if someone thought just the word poop was the funniest thing ever and nothing else they like really dumb comedy

Read this kid

Even if a person likes only poop jokes, based on what facts makes that's person's taste objectively bad?
For something to be objectively bad it needs to be based on facts, everything you said is still based on opinions.

it is a fact that saying just the word poop as a joke is a simple joke there is no context,play on words symbolism or any other of the million things i could list behind it, it is just a word and laughing at stating basic speech is stupid because then you might as well laugh at literally every word

>Population is objectively bad, we know this because based on FACTS it hurts our planet.
>Poop jokes is objectively bad because I say it is.
You cant be this stupid.

Nothing you said was facts you know that right? Simple =/= bad.

A joke has to have some sort of literally context or some form of implied refrance or structure to even be considered by DICTIONARY DEFINITION to be a joke so just laughing at the word poop is having bad taste

That's like saying raisins are objectively bad because they are dried up grapes. There is no facts to support that, just like with jokes. If they are liked or disliked it comes from a subjective view always.

liking very simple when it comes language and conveying concepts is bad because that's is actually just being stupid but there are other things outside of language that where simple things are good

stop making false dichotomies communication is much more complicated than food read this

Joke
>a thing that someone says to cause amusement or laughter, especially a story with a funny punchline.
especially =/= always

Cite your source.

thats is literally the shitty Google def, here is the Oxford version "A joke is a display of humour in which words are used within a specific and well-defined narrative structure to make people laugh"

yea retarded is running. How dare you want to do something that you want to do.

do I actually have to explain to you how people who can understand or enjoy more complex things then people who can not are smarter than them

The argument is not about what makes people smarter, it's the discussion on whether humor is subjective or not, and news flash it is.

did you read the rest of the thread? db and simple humor is objectively bad

for some reason my keys did not work I meant dumb not db

The concept of humor can never be objectively good or bad, because humor is based on opinions. Opinions can never be considered fact no matter the situation.

Here is the standard def of humor some jokes narrative are more complex and better than others

>That guy who holds his fat titties to stop them from jiggling when he runs

Attached: 1514996304249.jpg (251x242, 15K)

If someone makes an intellectual complex joke it is by FACT a good joke even though no one laughed, and the simple joke that gets people slapping their knees is considered by FACT a bad joke?

absolutely embarrassing, you should be ashamed. That is the epitome of autism. There has never been a decent person who has done this

Read this again

By that logic almost every meme in history is a "bad joke" despite being enjoyed by smart and stupid people.

now do i have to explain to you normalfag and robot memes

Is this an objectively good or bad joke?

Attached: 1994-08-09.gif (1200x360, 141K)

since I know none of the context behind it and it has no narrative that I can see and no literary devices behind,it is bad

And yet the Garfield comics have won numerous Emmy awards for this exact joke format. If this style of joke telling is "objectively bad" Jim shouldn't have won any award.

Emmys are a bad way to gauge how good jokes are they are an easily influenced private industry awards show so not every joke they say is good is actually good that's like saying since McDonalds is a major private food service company what food they say is good is definitely good

There are different ways of telling jokes, there is no universal right way to tell jokes.

yes but some ways are better than others because they are more complex than others

is it just me
or is garfield just the most unfunny shit ever

That's the whole point there is no way to universally gauge a joke, even the Emmys is based on popular vote. What you find funny and what the next guy finds funny will always differ.

Just because a joke is complex doesn't make it automatically good universally.

Yes but some peoples taste are better than the next guy because they like more complex jokes

So there are no bad complex jokes?

You are not "like this". You are strong like naruto OP. Nobody successful cares what normies think

Please read and

And why is complex better than simple? Since when was it fact that complex = good and simple = bad.

if they are complext they will have better timeing rthyem and and literary devices then a simple dumb joke so yes

>complext
brainlet

did you read the rest of the thread i already explained

>high school
>sitting at table eating lunch
>all tables are full so I sit on empty end of table with Stacies and Chads on the other end
>finish up and eat yogurt at dessert
>Stacies look at me, look at each other and then laugh
Girls will just laugh at anything my man, just ignore it. I wasn't eating in a static awkward movement either, I was just eating yogurt like anyone else. Fuck them.

Attached: 1515543866721.jpg (604x597, 32K)

did what I type was wrong besides the spelling

Running like that is dangerous if you fall you can really smash you're nose and chin

>did what I type was wrong
read that aloud to yourself
you're seriously a highly autistic fucking brainlet

what did I type that was wrong besides the spelling

Which is not a fact, so it can't be complex. A fact like apples can be red is objective it leaves no room for argument, humor on the other hand is a man made concept it can't be objective because there is always room to argue.

so it can't be objective*

you know that communication that uses literary devices like symbolism, metaphors, enjambment and other things is more complex than things that dont right

you're fucking with me
is english not your first language?

Here's you dude
vocaroo.com/i/s11yYAK0M3y0

Attached: 1516122866709.png (665x469, 4K)

That came across very natural. Good for you, buddy!

Yeah but it doesn't make it objectively better.

that does not answer my question :^). did you know that

I have explained so any times in this thread why complex communication is better than simple communication

In terms of humor no it's not. If the outcome is decided on opinions, then it's subjective end of story.