What can YOU do for HER?

Lure her in with my personality and body but leave her feeling emotionally disconnected and confused while I ignore her texts for days on end for no identifiable reason until I eventually bump into her at a party or in line somewhere and there is that awkward "oh hey" type of moment.

Attached: 1495323978284.jpg (500x375, 44K)

I doubt a girl that far gone is capable of any form of endearment or attachment. She's basically a goldfish passing by. She's already been flushed but is too dumb to know it.

>travelling
kek

Women ruin their ability to pairbond voluntarily, and they think it's "fun".

Then they wonder why they need 3 or 4 different pills to keep them from thinking suicidal thoughts.

Attached: 1528755539791.jpg (1000x2164, 464K)

this gives me hope. Im always worried about fucking people up more mentally by simply being around them

to let guys know theyre slutty without saying it

Thats pretty funny. Would date.

>Jow Forums tier thread
>300+ replys
>Jow Forums shitpost
>300+ (you)s
>actually fittness thread on /fit
>7 replys 404'ed after 30 mins
i want all the newfags to read the sticky or fuckoff

Sluts are gross, though

i wanna rape a girl, should i seek help

There's literally nothing wrong with it if you don't get caught.

Well, how do you not get caught?

Usually involves either a shovel, or a garbage bag and a cinder block.

>jumping to conclusions, the infograph

There's no evidence that promiscuity destroys the ability to pair-bond the way /pol9k/ insists. Sure, people who are promiscuous are less likely to maintain lifelong monogamous relationships, but you dumbasses have attached an extremely specific just-so explanation to that correlation with no further evidence or reasoning.

cope

ROASTIE ROASTIE OH SO TOASTIE

What's the extremely specific explanation we've attached to it besides what you already said?
>people who are promiscuous are less likely to maintain lifelong monogamous relationships
Yep I agree

treat her like the cumdumpster she is

The observed trend is that promiscuous people get divorced more.

The extremely specific explanation for the above trend is that having extramarital sex changes your brain so that you can't pair-bond in the future. This explanation bypasses numerous other potential factors such as the personality traits that lead to promiscuity and divorce in the first place, social groupings, and even economics (poor people have sex earlier and more often and are also more likely to get divorced). Basically the pair-bonding theory only got popular because it's the most emotionally satisfying to neo-reactionary incels.

Cum after her, for one.

since you can't unthot women

nothing

Either way, what's the difference in outcomes? If you find out a woman is promiscuous, it's clear she is unable to remain in relationships and is not wife material. If you want to say she's ruined her ability to pair bond, if you want to say it's personality, economics, etc.. there's no difference in the OUTCOMES.

Frankly, the exact pathways and mechanisms are immaterial.

correlation=/causation

>thread full of roastcoping
lmao

Eggs existed for tens of millions of years before chickens

Thot: btfo

Because that's a fucking hook-up app. If you're expecting to find an anti-feminist virgin catholic nun there, you're doing it wrong.

Sure if you're deciding what woman to date then it's probably not important exactly why she's raising red flags, but it's irresponsible to spread pseudoscience that can lead to people coming up with flawed ideas about society at large.

I realised Jow Forums died when the "QTDDTOT generals" appeared. questions that don't deserve their own thread Generals.

oh so my question about powerlifting judging doesn't deserve a thread but a fucking dyel retard posting tinder screenshots deserves 200 replies? fuck off.

Attached: WAMUUUUU.jpg (690x828, 122K)

Am i doing it right

Attached: 20180514_222812.png (1440x2465, 343K)

T. Someone who posted another "how is my progress guys?" Thread with his shitty dyel body

Attached: 1528783163818.jpg (3940x2664, 1.11M)

She was angling for hangover spooning

Attached: Screenshot_20180610-095727.png (1440x2560, 302K)

But again, what's the difference? Regardless of how it happens, it happens. The fact that women can lie about their promiscuity is a huge issue. It ought to be a requirement that you get a line/mark tattoo for every sexual partner you have.

t. 19 year old kid who's been on Jow Forums for 7 months.

At least that would be fitness related, unlike this shit

Attached: Screenshot_20180609-111331.jpg (435x124, 23K)

causation doesn't exist in science, only correlation

Its in your blood user, the thing is we arent fuckin animals anymore tho fag. Go get some help

Attached: 1528690236548.jpg (720x524, 39K)

You know you're doing it right. Just keep being funny, the chicks dig that shiet

Attached: 1527865383767.png (578x790, 263K)

u wot mate?

Sure it does, thats the point of multivaried analysis

>the year is 2026
>Eleanor, age 29, is making her POF profile
>"my son Aiden and my daughter Destiny are my world"
>"tired of games"
>"must be 6'0 or taller and have his life together"
>"hate drama"
>"traditional girl"
>uses pics from when she was 25
>puts her age as 27

Attached: smugalexjones.jpg (293x264, 16K)

ROASTIE COPE

Attached: 22B04DC7-D289-49D0-AA0E-4ED8A37E8451.jpg (640x1136, 204K)

>"please try and open with something more interesting than hey how's u"
>match
>"hey howre you :)"

Attached: 20180612_174852.png (1440x1444, 2.36M)

multivariate analysis gives you the percentage of correlation for each variable (with some error), it doesn't give you anything called "causation"

Agreed, basically all of Jow Forums gets crammed into a single thread while the rest is shitpost

>caring what you can do for her
>not caring what she can do for you

this is why you fail.

>hey howre you :)
I recently made a dating profile and thought I was being bombarded with bots because literally 60% of girls opened with "hey there :)" I don't even reply to those anymore

Fine, but you can break down variables into smaller parts and figure out what parts of each correlates with the other, what I was trying to say with correlation=/causation is the following:

Some girls might sleep around to cope with problems like insecurity and daddy issues, but probably not all of them.

You need to correct for bad upbringing/mental issues.

I mean at first the generals were kind of OK, steroid generals, powerlifting generals...that makes sense, for incredibly narrow questions.

but a fucking "questions that don't deserve their own thread"...that ruined Jow Forums

I've been here since 2011 and I despise the person who decided to make that thread.

It's literally the next "are you an archaeologist?"

>are you from Mississippi?
>...
>cause you're the only Missus I want to put my pp in

don't bother arguing with that idiot.

he probably isn't social enough to realise there's fuckloads of different people in the world.

he probably knows 2-3 girls and unironically watches jordan peterson videos.

I think it's more about that women with mental problems are more likely to be promiscuous, not the other way around.
It's the same why virginity is a deal-breaker in guys. You're simply more likely to be autistic and socially developed if you're a virgin.

The vast majority of people can find the balance between the two, arguing over it is just pointless

>ignore her texts for no reason

Fuck, I thought I was the only person to do this, why do we do it? If a girl I liked did that to me I'd get depressed af

>I'd take you to a movie but they don't allow outside snacks in the theatre ;)

Not joking, this line is golden

Absolute madman

because having a sense of humor, not taking yourself too seriously, and being dtf quickly are all attractive qualities?

>australian girls

Fuck off.

Roastcope

I can give her a thoroughly mediocre fuck she'd be wise to forget as soon as possible.

>It's the same why virginity is a deal-breaker in guys. You're simply more likely to be autistic and socially developed if you're a virgin.

This is a roastcope

Only the most pure of heart and soul use something like Tinder. By Jove!

where is this guy when mire threads are full of teenage dyels and larpers?

stop posting this in every thread faggot

>travelling

Confirmed

T H O T
H
O
T

No it's not, virgin guys are more likely to be ugly and autistic, ask 100 random dude on the street.
Next time someone says water is wet and you will ask for a study and say cope. Stay virgin

Not a virgin, but still, it's a huge cope. Virginity isn't bad, promiscuity is. You can't unsuck all those dicks.

Sluts are like vegans... they WILL make sure you know who they are.

Girls care a lot more about a guy being a virgin than guys care about a girl being a slut.
It's only the internet where its the opposite.
You're yelling at supply & demand

why all the roast-cope-tering here? yeah according to the graph 20% of them may still be stable, that's not a very safe bet though

Attached: cope.jpg (275x183, 11K)

>Girls care a lot more about a guy being a virgin than guys care about a girl being a slut.

My personal experience says the opposite. When I was a virgin, there were girls who specifically wanted to take it. I found that odd and unattractive.

Fuck what a degenerate. Hate hoes like this.

it's either roasties or their cuckboys that are here causing a ruckus

>what's the difference

If you were capable of thinking about social problems beyond "spank the bad kids" you might see actual feasible ways to reduce promiscuity given real information instead of /pol9k/ bullshit insight-porn.

>No it's not, virgin guys are more likely to be ugly and autistic

autistic yes, but definitately not ugly. I know plenty of 4channers irl who have insane jaws and insane height/frame. there's this guy who's beautiful as fuck and girls LITERALLY hit on him in the supermarket for no reason and he just walks away. I'm angry at him because he's so beautiful yet he doesn't use that beauty at all. he's too pure. I admire him in a nearly homosexual way. seriously he's the best looking guy I've seen in my life, and he doesn't even try. he has a shitty NEET hairstyle, 00s style clothes, and yet STILL he looks amazing.

no homo.

I find Hyde-inspired solutions to be the most tenable: We're just gonna KILL em!

Yeah but it doesn't make it a turn-on, it's just a special case. Like how guys want to fuck someone who is known as a big whore

Kek what was her reply?

>psychology majors
wow i sure learned a lot from your 4 year education about milquetoast "science"

can someone who doesn't have an armchair degree that can be copy-pasted from google actually analyze this infographic? real studies and quotes only, please.

Attached: tfwnogf.jpg (800x800, 40K)

>it's just a special case.

Sure, but it also means it's not a turn-off.

Whores don't make good wives, who knew?

>real studies and quotes only, please.

The fact of the matter is that Teachman et. al, Heritage, NSFG, etc. all support the same conclusion. You can look this up. The causes mean fuck-all because the results are the only thing you'll actually come into contact with.

If I could distill it into a single statement: hoes can't be housewives.

Attached: 1527058573165.jpg (633x360, 56K)

It's a turn-off. If you had to describe a guy to girls who havent seen him yet, telling he is a virgin would be a turn-off

nothing. What she could do for me?

>If you had to describe a guy to girls who havent seen him yet

How is that fair? Women are visual creatures

>the causes mean fuck-all
so correlation=/=causation? you are explicitly contradicting yourself

Who are you?

This is an objective way to decide whether something is a turn-on or a turn-off. Personal experience is just cherry picking

>Women are visual creatures
Humans are visual creatures, women are less visual

the outcome is what matters if you care about safety, why something is safe doesn't matter as long as it is