In the west is it impossible to find a virgin girl unless you dated as a teenager?
Even if I miracuously have sex, it will probably be with a roastie who's had 20+ partners...
In the west is it impossible to find a virgin girl unless you dated as a teenager?
Even if I miracuously have sex, it will probably be with a roastie who's had 20+ partners...
It's just something this generation has to accept.
It sucks, but you don't have much choice if you want a relationship.
Hopefully it'll be better for the next generation.
Average American girl loses her virginity at age 17.4.
While there probably aren't a lot of virgin 20+ girls left, a lot of non-virgins haven't had a huge number of partners.
I'm a 20 year old virgin femanon. It's possible but you probably shouldn't strive for a virgin though. Just get somebody who doesn't have casual sex. It's pretty normal for even conservative women to have sex with their boyfriends.
>In the west is it impossible to find a virgin girl unless you dated as a teenager?
Oh hell yeah. Buuut you probably won't want to stick your dick in a Tundra Pig...
Normalcy is no measure of health for a profoundly sick society.
There's nothing wrong with two committed people having intercourse. It's casual sex and hookup culture that breeds an entitled, disease laden populace.
>tfw have this standard and haven't even TRIED to meet a girl like this
I'm fucking done for aren't I, even if I have mega chad looks I'm done for
My wife was a virgin shut in neet when we got together in me college days
I just want a girl I can share my first time with. Even if its shit and awkward, I'll still be happy to know it was our first experience. And I just want to make that person happy. Never gonna happen though.
Why aren't you my girlfriend then? Face it, you're just larping too.
Because I don't know you user. You're likely a shut-in in a completely different country from me.
I'm almost certainly in a different country but I'm an otherwise well adjusted non-NEET non-hikki adult.
And how do you know they're committed to you? How do you know he won't just pump and dump you?
If you're american you have a chance.
If you're european, no fucking way lad. Maybe the UK and east europe has some virgin girls left.
That's why you still put a time limit. Half a year is enough to stop men who just want sex since they'd save time by just using a csmgirl or Tinder. Marriage is just a method for the government to take men's money in court.
Women who have sex before marriage aren't conservative.
There is no hope in eastern europe too. Most of the girls are turbo sluts.
Conservatives now are just slow liberals
So she isn't a whore but she's definitely fucked before
In the 50s or something she'd be considered a liberal
I found lots of fembots from east europe. Hungary, Poland, Romania. One from Kosovo too
But you never really know. He could be seeing people on the side while he waits for you to open up. And divorce is the method for governments to take men's money in court. The fact that we allow it to continue shows that we are both afraid of our own judgement and will allow our most sacred institutions to be overcome by convenience.
I didn't lose my virginity until I was 23, user-kun and I'm still with him.
I'm so fucking annoyed by him and this relationship is such a mistake because he acts like a complete teenager except he's 27 so I wish I had settled for another guy to be my bf.
>tfw no worthless gf who settles for me and stays with me forever
Fuckkjhdaikjdgsakhj
I haven't found any in my country sadly. Maybe I am not looking hard enough
Why?
Even if she only fucked in committed relationships, that just means she was that committed in the first place
I don't even want a relationship out of this shit culture. I want a soulmate, a person to be in love with and spend the rest of my life with. Someone who will be my other half, forever. Not a friend whom I fuck for a year or so before moving on. I need to find an alien or some shit, or some extremely rare human.
there is a shit ton of qt virgins on r9k, and there will continue to be.
they are hard to find specially with the internet.
that being said, I'm not actively looking for one.
*they are not hard to find
definitely not impossible
virgin girl here and I'm 19, almost 20
we exist, you just won't find many of us on tinder or other dating sites
The type of men I date aren't capable of having chicks on the side. I only go for men who are lonely and below average in looks. Typically mentally ill too.
But you're not in europe though.
sex is sex.
yes there are some losers in the west. they are as fat as you'd expect.
Well it's a bit different for people who don't want ugly and mentally ill kids
Why are you specifically seeking a virgin girl? It's not relevant at all if she is a virgin or not. And it's not like you could even tell if she is a virgin.
>what is a hymen
>not originul
Would you buy a mattress that 20 different guys masturbated all over?
How about eating a bowl of cereal that's been regurgitated by 8 people?
I probably had multiple underage girls who looked older i guess.
How did he find you, what did he do to woo you, same country or not, and metrics (time to first meeting/date, time to first shared pic, etc.)?
Nor will we ever find you in real life and neither on Jow Forums, hence it's impossible to find hence you are more likely to be a larper than real.
It seems like you don't know what a hymen is yourself user. It's a small layer of flesh around the entrance to the vagina. Some women are born without one or it's nearly nonexistent. Most women won't have a noticeable hymen by the time they're 14 because it can be stretched by tampons, exercise, masturbation, etc. It's not the aluminum seal on your juicebox.
I live in Europe. I'm visiting family in the US right now.
this is b8. no getting around the fact
>inb4 im a virgin but my hymen broke when i fell on a fencepost
>just accept things you don't like
Faggot enabling to the core.
>20
thats nothing. you'll lose it in 3 years top.
>he fell for the hymen meme
There are virgins with no hymen. There are nonvirgins with some hymen. What are you going to do, deep inspect it? You can't feel it with your dick.
If the mattress is washed clean and good as new, how can you tell if someone slept on it or not? Same thing with girls. You can't tell if a guy has had his dick inside her or not. It's not like she permanently carries the sperm of every guy she has fucked in her pussy and on her face.
>not like she carried the sperm of every guy she fucked
no but she does carry genetic markers from every guy she conceived with, even if she was unaware of the pregnancy. this is also ignoring the data showing unironically that the more dicks shes had inside her, the less able she is to pair bond
I'm not really that bothered about sex. I mostly just want a gf so I'll have somebody to do things with. Go to gigs, play videogames, watch anime, go for random walks, etc. I probably wouldn't want to have sex often anyway since I don't even like wearing a t-shirt around people.
>It's not like she permanently carries the sperm of every guy she has fucked in her pussy and on her face
true, but sometimes girls are dumb enough to tell the whole world bout their sex life, hot to jerk off to, not hot to date or marry.
>believes in the memes
lifes gonna be hard for you little guy
get fucked roastie whore. the wall will be here before you know it
>It's not like she permanently carries the sperm of every guy she has fucked in her pussy
>Chimerism from a foetus means women carry sperm from every man she's slept with.
Actual retards. A fetus destroys the immune system and filters all of its blood through the female. Any foreign cells are destroyed by the immune system. Otherwise ever person who's hand you shook or bumped into on a bus would absorb into your skin.
Also, every 7 years not a single atom in your body will be the same as it previously was. This means even if your hypothesis was true it would mean nothing 7 years later.
Lel if everyone just accepts it why would things change?? If you want things to be less shitty you better wipe your ass.
I'm intimidated by men my age that have obviously had a lot of partners to begin with. I'm 24 btw. I'd obviously rather find virgin men closer to my age but it doesn't seem feasible at this point.
bone cells take much longer to turn over.
but true, microchimerism doesn't work like that and you literally cannot absorb genes. the entire viral vector industry wouldn't exist if you could
>the government funded study is wrong because I don't like it
theroperreportsite.wordpress.com
The truth hurts roast
>sex doesn't matter lol
But it does, every time you have sex with a person who was not your first, your ability to bond is eroded, and your capacity to love a partner is diminished. Even having a single relationship end and moving on causes irreversible damage to a persons pair bonding.
Basically, if you've had sex with >1 person before you die, you're not a person anore regardless of age or gender
>Any foreign cells are destroyed by the immune system
jesus understand some basic biology. the foreign dna passes through the blood/brain barrier. the quoted greentext is partly true. what you fail to acknowledge is that in order for a woman to give birth without her immune system causing a miscarriage is that the fathers DNA unironiy becomes a permanent part of her so that her immune system doesnt attack the baby and allows it to be carried to term. a guy hooking up with a slut is more likely to be literally stealth cucked, passing on the girls previous partners DNA in his own child
>committed
>not married
kek
Everything you said is false. It's all based on true facts but misrepresented ludicrously.
You're a faggot that's why. The virgin men at that age are str8.
That's not true either. Immune reaction is heavily regulated in the uterus so that sperm doesn't get murdered. During pregnancy, there is thymic involution which is what mostly avoids the death of the fetus. It's because set memory t-cells cannot reprogram and therefore they deplete to death during that period. That's also why there is post-partum thymic regeneration and it's believed that this can explain why women longevity is generally higher than men's (also observed in eunuchs).
I'm a khv female. So no. I'm not a roastie.
Also
>Links page where the first line reaffirms my statement.
Sperm =/= fetal cells. Microchimerim only occurs if a female becomes pregnant.
>dated as a teenager?
got news for you OP. My first gf and I were 14 when we got together and she had already lost her virginity at a party with a guy she just met.
Notice how the virgin girls posting are always around 18-20 but never 25+. Really makes you think
Stop cherrypicking.
Women who are 25+ don't go on r9k. By that point they have boyfriends.
I'm between bf's, that happens you know
>a blog post made by a bitter incel who didn't even finish high school now counts as scientific evidence
>has had multiple bfs
>thinks shes a fembot
So something that has happened since the beginning of history? Doesn't seem like a big deal to me, 0.001% doesn't really mean much, does it.
Why don't you quit cherry picking yourself? Here's the source on the statement in that blogspot post. (I don't know why they didn't use the actual document. It's available freely.)
Rape has also happened since the beginning of history. Is that ok now?
>Hungary
How? I'm planning to move there once i pull my shit together and i want a fembot
>You know humanity is fucked when you have to go to the kindergarten to find a virgin
All girls over 12 have had sex and all women are whores. It's just the way it is.
Yes, I met my long term girlfriend through friends in university and we were both virgins. She is the love of my life.
By what metric am I judging it? Morality, personal responsibility, what? It seems to me some farm girl getting raped 1000 years ago isn't that significant in the grand scheme of things, just like 0.01% of a person being from the mothers previous sexual partners isn't really that important. What difference does it make, even a relatively simple protein requires several genes to be created, it's not like it will fundamentally change who you are.
What's the problem?
The problem, you fucking whore, is that you can't comprehend that intangible things like loyalty and exclusivity might be more important.
>hurr only men understand loyalty and dignity
I know that this is half shitposting, and that some women can be bitches, but are you listening to yourself? You give men way too much credit.
>implying women understand loyalty
that may have been true 2 or 3 generations ago but it hasnt been true for a very long time now
I'm currently lying awake, unable to sleep because I'm fretting over this very thing and my girlfriend. Pretty sure her number is around the 60 mark. She used to do a lot of cocaine and ecstasy, and has lots of faggots for friends who are just the worst influence for degenerate behavior.
She's not even hot but she was still able to rack up a number like that.
I'm really into her but that part of her past has been fucking with me so much. It's fucking disgusting. I don't know if I can stay with her for much longer. It would be foolish to marry and bear children with someone who treats sex like a handshake.
Clearly not, if you think having sex before a long term relationship is alright
>waaaah I have to save myself
Suck it uo whore
Yeah I bet even the shy ugly ones get a bf before 25. Fuck all they have to do is leave the house on a regular basis and someone will hit on em. Fucking privileged as fuck gender.
Ever thought the reason you are a virgin is because you never leave the house?
What, you don't want the mother of your children to have had 50 dicks in her?
Yes, that is part of the problem. But it doesn't change the fact that girls don't have do jack shit except maintain the most basic level of hygiene while guys are supposed to be charming, providing, handsome, outgoing, all this bullshit.
Being worried that 0.01% of a child might be form a previous sexual partner isn't a question of loyalty or exclusivity, it's childish entitled control and is completely unwarranted and unattractive..
pair bonding
You don't need charisma if you're a meatsack with two fuckholes and some mammary glands.
Most men have sex before a long term relationship though. And by most I mean like 90%. Do men not understand loyalty?
Where are getting these statistics?
You got a source on that, or are you just going to keep pulling shit out of your cuntflaps?
Not applicable to humans. Lived experience will show you that that's a retarded meme. Emperor Penguins display pair bonding, and if a mate dies the other will never, ever find another. Meanwhile how many of the couples from your high school are still together?
If you're suggesting that human society would be better if we followed the penguins example, then you're retarded. People developed intellect to control their environments and their nature.
90%? Then why are there so many male virgins and so little female virgins? Can you explain this?
Emperor Penguins are still here aren't they?
That depends on what you mean by "The West". I mean, I live in Idaho, it's not like we don't have thots, but they're not all that common, and it's still looked down upon.
>pair bonding
>not applicable to humans
jfc just stop. youve dug yourself into too deep of a hole. stop before it becomes your grave
>Within the United States, a cohort study of young adults in university found men self-report more permissive attitudes about casual sex than women. Another study found university students can be grouped by their ideal relationships those who express a desire for sex exclusively in a committed partnership have fewer hookups and friends with benefits partners than those categorised as desiring flexible relationships and recreational sex.
>One 2006 study that analysed the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study found that more boys report having non-dating sexual partners than girls. Of this sample, a third of boys only have had sex with their romantic partner, another third of boys who have had sex with a partner they are not dating within the past year are believed to wish for the girl to be their girlfriend. Many young adults are more likely to engage in sex with romantic partners than with casual acquaintances or friends with benefits.
en.wikipedia.org
2 seconds of googling.
Well it's not. Do you know couples that have broken up? Have both partners gone on and lived their own lives and found other partners? If this is true then pair bonding isn't human nature.