Are traps gay?

you really gotta ask yourself do you think of traps as woman?

Yes. please kiss me

Traps are literally designed to confused your sexuality. Hence why they're called "traps".

Human sexuality is more flexible and mutable than you've been led to believe.

Attached: 1506300315121.jpg (637x900, 362K)

It's not fair, Jow Forums told me that traps where not gay

Attached: 1507714976056.png (691x653, 20K)

Wow, we finally have the answer.

What anime is this please
Tried reverse image search and still can't find.

Attached: 1530402922001.png (200x202, 49K)

homosexuality is defined as attraction to the same sex. It doesn't matter how he looks, it's a man and being attracted to one is gay. Nothing wrong with being gay, but it is gay.

Why worry user? What makes you happy makes you happy. Hold on to that warm feeling, no matter where you find it. Use it to push yourself to improve, and take a better outlook on life

Of course traps aren't gay sweetie! Just ignore the dick! ;)

Attached: tumblr_p620z3X8uR1uds101o2_400.gif (400x301, 1.15M)

liking traps, twinks, femboys etc etc is inherently gay ephebophilia.

people will say "hurr theyre feminine" but really its just the lack of dimorphism associated with pubertal children. not to mention their typical ugly man faces and veiny hands.

There's a reason twinks start to look like cockroaches after about 20 years old.

Liking full blown shemales is arguably not gay

but the vast majority of "traps" you see on the internet are just little boys in anime dresses

so in that sense, yes its gay, but pederasty existed as an institution in some form or another in most of the civilizations in history.

Attached: 1523386183867.gif (372x368, 964K)

Oregairu, user. The MC is a robot so it can be pretty relatable.

Heres the thing. Attraction to traps roughly fits the definition of gynandromorphophilia. As traps are characterised as biosex males presenting feminine characteristics. The vast majority of gynandromorphophilic men are heterosexual. It has been well known in the sex industry for decades, that heterosexual men are the primary consumer of transexual and "shemale" porn.
For a more detailed discussion I suggest that you see this genuine, serious video in which Dr. layman looks at hard research papers on the matter. www(.)youtube.com/watch?v=4Ph8Cae07bo
In short. The science seems to say that it isn't gay if it's a feminine penis.

No traps aren't gay, so there is no need to worry about it. Don't listen to trolling anons trying to tell you otherwise. They look female and that is all that matters.

Attached: 9E035523-F79A-489D-B90C-3E5054BF7A83.jpg (861x1137, 473K)

tfw no trap gf, this is an original feel.

Ah ya beat me to it. But yeah the simple fact that gays aren't watching trap porn and only people that identify as straight watch it says a lot. If the sex industry calls it straight then gotdang it, it's straight. Plus, I think it's cause to fugg a reverse trap anyways. I'm not talking a tomboy, I'm talking straight manly looking guy with a vagina.

The problem isnt that its gay its that trannies are fucking unnatural and usually end up looking disgusting. If it was just regular faggotry most people wouldn't care.

Yeah. I think theres other aspects too. And that whether its gay depends largely on why you like traps. In my case it is mostly the idea of being a trap that I like. However the idea of getting fucked by a cock or sexual relations with man is disgusting to me, as I am straight.

>In short. The science seems to say that it isn't gay if it's a feminine penis.
what you don't understand is that the definiton of homosexuality is attraction to the same sex. It doesn't matter how that person looks, if you're attracted to the same sex you're gay.

Yes but attraction is multi-faceted. Its not as simple "I am heterosexual, this person is female. Therefore I am attracted to them." Homo/hetero sexuality are broad, inaccurate terms that make general statements about the nature of attraction. Youre not just attracted to "women" yiu are attracted to a specific body type and characteristics and personality traits. Its the same for traps. You're not attracted to them because they're men. Its because of the aesthetic characteristics they display. It just so happens that these characteristics manifest in a male. So if you want to call that homosexual you can. But then homosexuality would appear to not be a particularly useful term in this conversation.
As I said above. I like traps. I'm not gay though. I wouldnt want to fuck or be fucked by another man. I would however, like to be a sterotypical "trap". So is that really "homosexual"?

Wouldn't it depend on what aspect of the trap you like though? The essence of a trap is to 'trap', mimic, emulate the opposite sex. Most people are attracted to secondary sex characteristics, the traits that a trap tries to adopt. How many of you wank to close up picks of vaginas? If a trap can successfully display feminine characteristics, which you are in turn attracted to, is it really gay?

I concur. Sexuality is defined by secondary traits. If I only wanted to fuck vaginas I'd be fucking animals, they lowkey have better looking vaginas anyways.

Good points here. What I simply call "aesthetics" you guys identify as secondary sex characteristics. That's really the properly articulated version of what I meant. Its not gay because your attraction occurs specifically because the trap is adopting female characteristics. And being attracted to female characteristics is not gay.

>Yes but attraction is multi-faceted.
Actually it's not. You're either attracted to a person or you're not. If you're attracted to a person and that person is of the same sex, then you're gay. Nothing wrong with being gay and i have nothing against traps or homosexuality, but it IS gay.
See above. It doesn't matter why or how. The literal definition of homosexuality is attraction to the same sex. If you're attracted to the same sex you're gay. It's that simple.

Lol, just no. By that logic liking ftm's who look exactly like men is straight which just isn't right. Looks are what matters in terms of attraction, not biological sex. The anons above already proved it with porn studies, which you just ignored because it contradicts your point.

Attached: 6349D8F1-9AF6-4312-B01C-42655E7DD464.png (416x416, 201K)

Homosexualities definition is the SOLE attraction to the same sex (based on the presumption that those people actually look like the sex that they are and not the opposite) as secondary sex characteristics are the basis of attraction and how people identify each other. Even if you want to argue that the presence of the same primary sex characteristics is a gay aspect, then it would still just be bisexual, due to the female secondary sex characteristics.

2D traps are half gay, 3D traps are full gay.

You may not be gay for liking traps (I can understand both sides of the argument), but the traps themselves are certainly gay.

Attached: CCB9B307-C101-449D-80DB-BB8F7E521F32.jpg (500x500, 95K)

What about tomboys? Are they gay in your opinion?