Are there magical intelligence barriers where people go from nice, to assholes, to reasonable?

Are there magical intelligence barriers where people go from nice, to assholes, to reasonable?

There are mentally retarded people, they're usually nice people, they don't try to be hostile and mean to people.
>Mentally retarded people are nice

Then inebtween you have this group of people who are very, very stupid, unable to perform critical thinking... They're also assholes about it. They spout their opinions with extremely poor reasoning, usually things that makes no sense at all. They're also usually very extreme in their opinion, in younger ages they memester about it.
Generally they keep shouting their opinion without listening to any counter-arguments, and they keep being assholes.
They can be SJWs, and they can be Jow Forumstards, or whatever.
Not all people of this category are this way, some are nice, but I think this is where MOST of the hostile people are.
>A middle ground has strong opinions, even etremely strong opinions. Never have any arguments that can stand up to critical thinking, they can't perform it themselves. Don't listen to counter arguments, keeps repeating themselves

Then I believe most intelligent people, or close to intelligent people, tend to be reasonable.
Sometimes they'll have some strong opinions, sometimes they're assholes, but generally they're much more pleasant people, who are much more reasonable.
If you throw them a legitimate argument, they may even change their mind, or delve deeper into why they have taken the stance they have.
>Smarter people are reasonable, will listen to counter arguments, and can change their mind. Generally they're not hostility seeking, and are nice people.

My guess is
> IQ IQ ~80-125
Often extreme opinions, don't listen to counter arguments, unable to do critical thinking, can't change opinion. Hostility seeking.

>IQ

Attached: f7beea9a75059d23575b4af5a20131f8.jpg (640x640, 45K)

Of course, forgot to mention.
If the person has some form of autism, usually aspergers, the IQ categories doesn't work anymore.

They're an exception.
They are able to deal logical problems, but unable to apply it to the real world.

Some are nice, some are total assholes.

>IQ

As I stated, the person can't be afflicted by aspergers.

IQ is a meme and attitude is socially conditioned

Yes, to an extent.
But if you're able to do critical thinking, and realizing you're not that knowledgeable about certain subjects, you're able to form an opinion beyond your social conditioning.

The is obviously just typoed.
If you had any intelligence you'd be able to realize this yourself.

>you're able to form an opinion beyond your social conditioning
Yeah no. What music do you like? Any answer you give is because social conditioning.
It's so ingrained into you that you don't even know its there.

You're a perfect example of the middle category.

A persons music tastes changes all the time. It's also irrelevant to this.

>category
Because slapping a label onto something very complex always works right? Makes you feel comfortable with it, like you understand the whole system. The point is, most people think their music tastes are their own, and not a result of social conditioning. If something so personal, something that everybody thinks defines them for who they are, like tastes in music is actually not their own, then its not a stretch to think that any opinion that you have is also due to social conditioning. Universal intelligence is a meme. Different people are intelligent at different things. You can't just slap a number on it and call it a day. It's way more nuanced than that.

The differences with those IQ categories are pretty massive.

IQ 130 is reasonably high, not exactly intelligent, but are able to produce some critical thought.

Around this normal intelligence people become cocky, hostile, and arrogant.

Did you even read the post you retard.

You were garbling nonsense.

Music taste has nothing to do with this, and only a very, very, basic person would think it's something unique to them.

>claims everything he doesn't understand is "nonsense"
>can't even follow written conversation

In what way are people hostile and militant about music genre? Are people assholes for liking or disliking certain types of genres?

You're not arguing ANYTHING, you just started to talk about music, pretending like you're this great philosopher.

Do i really have to fucking explain it to you like to a child you brainlet?

In the post you said
>you're able to form an opinion beyond your social conditioning
Which i quoted in and said music taste is also a part of social conditioning.
You should have deduced that if music taste is part of social conditioning, then any opinion also is. But you didn't.
You asked for clarification in post which is reasonable but still pretty stupid.
In the reply i've made three claims
>labels are meaningless
>opinions are also social conditioning
>universal intelligence doesn't exist
And then in your reply you start with listing all the labels you think exists instead of arguing why labels have meaning.
This suggests you haven't read my post specifically explaining why people like labeling things and how useless that is.
And then to top it all off in you're claiming music has nothing to do with this when the whole reason for this conversation is your claim that
>you're able to form an opinion beyond your social conditioning
which is incorrect since those opinions are also part of social conditioning which was the whole fucking point of bringing music tastes as explained in Now delete the thread since you're just embarrassing yourself.

As I said, you're prime example of the middle group.

>Generally they keep shouting their opinion without listening to any counter-arguments, and they keep being assholes.
>They can be SJWs, and they can be Jow Forumstards, or whatever.

>you're able to form an opinion beyond your social conditioning

There's this thing called context.
Music taste is not within context, and just bringing it up in the first place was stupid.

>reads how labels are meaningless
>still tries to put people into labels
>reads the claim that if music taste is part of social conditioning, then opinions are too
>still thinks music taste has nothing to do with it

Also, music taste is taste, like what food tastes you like.
They're subjective.

SO ARE OPINIONS you fucking moron THATS THE POINT

>Human rights
>THEY'RE SUBJECTIVE!!!
>THAT'S THE POINT
Enough, I've already lost a few braincells.

>19 year old armchair psychologist tries to label people using generalizations based on a number between 1 and 200 that he believes accurately reflects a persons "intelligence" rather than their ability to recognize some patterns and also is somehow able to inform about their entire personality and emotional reaction

Attached: anons physical appearance analysis theory.png (581x383, 37K)

They are though. Stealing medication to keep you alive is moral for you, but immoral for the person you've stolen from for example.

A few days ago there were a dumb woman saying her intelligence was too intimidating for men.
Daily you read about peoples hot opinions who are unable to back them up, the little backing up they can make is picked apart with just the shallowest of critical thinking.

Do you not find this interesting?
A certain level of stupid makes people very nice. Even though they may come across as selfish, annoying, and awkward, they're still pleasant people.
But a bit less stupid and they turn into these hot opinionated tardos who think they're all smart, but then makes the dumbest of arguments.

Clearly, a certain someone was very hurt by the first post, and took to emotionally arguing against it, instead of contributing to the thread.

Also, is that your post you made? Seems like it.

What does that have to do with human rights?
Either way, that's not subjective, you stated it as an objective idea.

>they turn into these hot opinionated tardos who think they're all smart, but then makes the dumbest of arguments
the irony and lack of self-awareness is astounding

>he actually believes intelligence correlates with niceness

>magical intelligence barriers

Sweetie as long as you think it's about intelligence you'll never get it. People are people are people. The wisest stuff I've ever heard has came from "knuckledraggers" okay honey? Nobody likes a know it all