What football position requires you to be the most Jow Forums and why is it running back?
I don't know if RB is the one where you have to be the fittest, but:
> You need to be speedy as fuck
> You need to agile like a weasel
> You need to tank yourself through 260lbs defensive players which are 2 heads bigger than you
11 (eleven) minutes of gameplay. Then divide those 11 minutes into time when your team has the ball. Then also subtract the time when you're replaced on third downs.
You dont need to be Jow Forums at all.
meanwhile soccer players struggle benching 1pl8 while footballers are comfortably at 3pl8+
fuck off twink
Lol you've probably never fully exerted yourself for 11 minutes in your life faggot
im not even a soccer fan, but attack the boogeyman anyway
It depends on how the team actually uses them. The Kansas City Chief played the fuck out of Kareem Hunt so I'm sure he needed to be in good shape.
>niggerball
So you only have to move when your team has the ball? Ok...
>RBs play D
How does soccer not have 90
Imitating injuries xF for the rest of time
OLB in a 3-4, you have to be big and strong enough to go up against offensive linemen but fast enough to cover running backs and tight ends.
They have terrible distance cardio
I agree with this
Accurate.
Probably generally true. But at least in the NFL, teams run the ball like half the amount of times a game that the used to. Even more with certain teams.
>b-but soccer!!!
Every time. Have fun watching giant black men slam into each other and get concussions.
It says action.
Clock never stops when play stops
Not sure if it also means calm moments like the goalie is chilling with the ball
This is why rugby players are gods amongst men. They're strong and they have to run a lot.
Theres a reason 1 billion watch football world cup and not handegg and its not because those footballers can bench lesd than those roided monkies.
In big rugby countries, do they have riches and golddiggers like NFL players?