In other words, is it better to train failure every set, or try to get a certain weight and certain amount of reps and then move up in weight next time once you've hit that goal?
just make sure you have linear progression between training sessions. once you reach heavy weights training to failure becomes impossible and dangerous with some lifts like bench press, its better to have a steadily increasing load
Jayden Jackson
I don't care wtf this thread is about, damn that's a fine ass chick
Isaac Scott
Thats a nigger
Aiden Lopez
>dangerous with some lifts like bench press you should bench press in a power rack if you aren't failing reps, you aren't training hard enough
Daniel Russell
I do the first option, because if that way I'm sure I'm doing all I can
Kevin Harris
wtf where do you all find these black girls every black girl around me is a sheboon and I have built an opinion most of them are sheboons too
Mason Morgan
you're an incel
Jack Torres
instagram and tumblr duhhh. I go to a mostly white school and always have, so i've learned to not look ghetto. You can find more like that in white spaces.
Joshua Foster
This: 62.5kg X 8 =500 60kg X 7 = 420 60kg X 6 = 360 55kg X 6 = 330 TOTAL = 1610
Or this:
4 sets of 8 reps 55kg TOTAL = 1760
Whatever the higher total work volume is generally better.
Training every set to failure is retarded because training to failure on one set will affect the others greatly. If you want to train to failure it is best saved for the last set of the excersise. Also instead of training to absolute failure, it's better to train to technical failure. Make your last set an AMRAP set instead then.
Personally I would do neither.
Your first option lacks volume and your second lacks intensity.
I think your best option is to slap another set to your first option and be done with it.
Logan Harris
>so i've learned to not look ghetto bruh what, did you just say you are black browsing fit? 2018 and I still dont believe someone is not white posting here