What is Jow Forumss honest opnion on adolf hitler?

>success story
Well, at least it was until 1945

no idea.
but i would gladly share a smoke with him and listen to his problems

>13 year old boys deserve to die fighting for Berlins rubble but please dont put my based strong independent women into combat :(
He was a white knight faggot

>implying
He successfully killed himself, how many suicidal robots can say the same?

>implying there is anything wrong with nationalism
oy vey, you stupid goyim! How dare you care about your people and your country instead of my global corporations!.

He's a pretty cool dude, compared to what is going on now.
He was just a crowd puppet channeling some hatred, shit happens, today we are all robots.

You can be a nationalist and not be an authoritarian, genocidal lunatic. I'm nationalist and a liberal. As long as populations disagree with each other we'll always need national boundaries.

Mussolini came back from the grave just to let you know you're a huge fucking faggot.

Hitler had gay sex, so did other Nazis. Many Nazis have had non-binary genders. I fully support National Socialism. I was born male when I should've been born female, it's not a "sickness" or "degeneracy", I'm taking hormones and I will soon not look male at all on the outside.

He is the reason germany has no culture anymore. Germany basically adopts most social and political Trends from burgerland with a few years lag.

Lets just entertain the thought that Donald Trump is indeed the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler (I'm too lazy to see if that would even work). Then why would be be born into all that money? Think about it.

>got millions of kr*utoids and gorillions of slav(e)s killed, paving the way for anglo-judeo dominance
pretty based desu

Great man, made a lot of poor decisions though which may or may not have been attributable to his retarded doctor

Attached: 1519373629239.jpg (702x672, 68K)

He meant well. Unfortunately there were malevolent, and dishonest men in his organization.

Pic related.

orig post

Attached: 1528307263366.jpg (1254x1787, 553K)

right a book if you want to cram as many words into a meme as possible faggot

Attached: 1527640115932.jpg (643x820, 131K)

I don't know man I didn't pay attention in school

Versailles was throughly unfair and made to punish Germany and turn it into a third world nation. Even mainstream historians agree on that.
Also the jews deserved worse than they got

He empowered Hjalmar Schacht to create the world's only truly Keynesian economy then ruined it by overproducing war goods. He was an extremely charismatic speaker with an excellent grasp of the frustrations of the working class.

Also he was a loony twit with stupid ideas about race and a condition which made him fart uncontrollably. He discarded 40 years of psychological research and is wholly responsible for the decline in German scientific exellence. The idea that he had the balls to try eugenics and then selected for the most inbred aryans available infuriates me.

IMO it makes more sense for Trump to be the reincarnation of Patton, but both work
Though honestly that doesn't really have anything to do with anything. Nigel Farage and Putin were both literally whos in their countries until they got their big break. No need to be born a celebrity or a public figure to be relevent

I love that he killed the disabled and other worthless people. 90% of the human race genuinely deserves to be exterminated.

I miss him and I wish he was still with us.

This the most Jow Forums thing I've ever read.

The third Reich was an actual beta uprising.

Reincarnation isn't something set in stone. While it's extremely far fetched that Trump is Hitler, that doesn't necessarily mean he didn't reincarnate as him, but the similarities between characters are nowhere to be found, despite what whining liberals tell you.

Nazi Germany is a complex machine it wasnt his fault they lost.

Trump is a jew and he's closer to a Mussolini than a Hitler.

Nope, they idealized Chad and tried to exterminate undesirable ethnic groups and the disabled. The Third Reich was simply reinforcing normie-ism.

Despite being a literal fag I look up to him in some ways and have always been a bit of a naziboo. His story is very inspiring.

shouldn't have bothered invading russia

He is an embodiment of God, who chose his own destiny in order to fail and eventually set this world right.

greatest man who has ever lived

But that would have defeated the purpose. Also they needed land for lebensraum (Hitler planned on murdering every slav in eastern europe and then repopulating the area with germans. So much for white solidarity lol.)

Attached: 1530759324188.png (500x815, 54K)

Hitler never said Slavs were subhuman . That's a kike myth

Except the Aryan Chad was not really capitalist, Western Chad at all. Aryanism involved a racial, bodily aesthetic but more important to the ideology and nation was the personality, which is why values like kindness to children and animals were lauded as opposed to the western world where it's funny when kids cry and animals are tortured.

Attached: 1488015216360.jpg (640x477, 130K)

He did say there were inferior to Germanics though (which is true).

Im not a Jow Forumstard (im asian) but Hitler was based when it came towards the jews, you cant deny that they have been a plague on any society that lets them in

I'm not a racist, I just don't care for jews

That makes it worse though. He still planned on starving them to death to make way for aryans. However ultimately his real goal was just to destabilize the USSR in a vain attempt at destroying communism (the real goal of any and all fascists, regardless of their stated ideologies or beliefs.)

Hitler was a capitalist. His supporters were mostly smaller, national capitalists who had suffered after being punished for starting WWI. Hitler literally murdered the socialists in his party.

Attached: 1530931135501.jpg (622x350, 36K)

No, he planned on having Slavs rebel and instilling Germanic ruler-ship (like the Tzars), as he said in Mein Kampf.

Hitler was anti-capitalist, and anti-socialist, at least in the modern definition of "socialist".

he was on to something when he started questioning zionists controlling the world but killed innocent jews and others out of autism instead.
If he was smart he wouldve drafted the jewish men so they could win the war and then when he is in charge, make change to the world

The only good thing about Hitler was that he killed himself to avoid being captured by the Soviets. He killed far more white people than just about any single leader since.

Attached: nazbol3423.jpg (429x538, 78K)

>thinking the over-civilized Jew is a valuable soldier

The best thing about him was that he helped to weaken eastern Europe tremendously and inadvertently gave a the USSR a huge amount of land as a result.

Attached: marx face.png (750x500, 995K)

Trump is far closer to Churchill (also a Jew or crypto-Jew)

Because of Mongol blood. Mongols were uncivilized savages who did nothing but rape and murder true civilizations, meanwhile Hitler praised China and Japan despite being Asiatic.

Just because he needed capital to kickstart the regime doesn't mean he was capitalist. He was a national socialist.

This is retarded, I can't believe how much you people buy the Zionist Hollywood propaganda. For what purpose would Hitler waste valuable resources and murder innocent people? If Hitler took hold of Soviet territory, he would simply have separated the Aryans from the non-Aryans, since Aryan is a BODY AND RACIAL TYPE, not an ethnic group! Evinced by this is the fact that multiple ethnicities were part of the Waffen-SS (considered the racial elite) and that there are SLAVIC SWASTIKAS dating from prehistory.

Attached: 304b20b9d7279b6f3d9054febb7c3ec3.jpg (500x483, 47K)

>Because of Mongol blood
The passage I am thinking of had nothing to do with "Mongol blood".

Post it. For the record, if you are quoting from Mein Kampf, he was planning on taking it out of circulation as it was just a propaganda piece and not necessarily the true thoughts or beliefs of a Hitler who actually won chancellorship.

Attached: 1447569913976.jpg (900x700, 220K)

>Hitler played to the crowd
No shit, I am not about to look the passage, and i do not have it saved. So I guess we can let it rest, but if you reread Mein Kampf, and watch for it, you will know.

stricken with the MANLET RAGE

Attached: Screenshot_20180715-235539_Chrome_crop_540x247.jpg (540x247, 29K)

>height has been static throughout time

That was the equivalent of being ~5'11" back then. Stalin was something like 5'4".

Stalin did better.

Attached: _87974594_32be803c-efcf-47ef-9a17-197106074016.jpg (624x624, 47K)

It's just false, m8. Hitler basically wouldn't hurt a fly. The war was forced on him. His grand intention was to revive the Aryan (Neolithic-era peoples) race, he never wanted to genocide a bunch of people for no reason. Even his mortal enemies, the Jews, he did not kill, as we know the Holocaust was a lie. He only put them in quarantine, as he treated Jewishness as a virus, a condition. Now for what purpose would he kill Slavs, when Slavic people hold a vital part of the Aryan biological puzzle? It would have been counter-productive and any Hitlerist worth his salt knows this.

Attached: 1488000547509.jpg (297x375, 47K)

Clearly
>when will they learn?

Attached: manlets.png (712x480, 238K)

We agree on everything. Hitler didn't wantonly kill anything or anyone, but he did regard Slavs as inferior, just as he did Negroids (though Slavs were inferior to a lesser extent).

It is not false, Hitler is the most admirable man who ever lived, and I have legitimately read Mein Kampf, and should do so again.

Hitler did not regard any specific ETHNIC GROUP as inferior, this is the point I am trying to make. You seem like somebody with an honest interest in Hitler and Third Reich Germany who isn't just an idiot Jow Forumstard trying to peddle and agendas, so I'll give you a suggestion.

aryanism.net/culture/adolf-hitler/

Read this whole website, and start with this link.

Attached: 1488008888072.jpg (580x378, 52K)

White nationalism is the ultimate form of white-knightery (pun intended).

I will read it, but I am telling you, what I am basing this point of is direct from Mein Kampf. Hitler thought that "Germanics" (a racialist term - not Nationalist) should rule over Slavs, as has been true traditionally.

And yes, Hitler thought of different races as inferior or superior, especially, for instance, blacks. That doesn't mean he wished ill will towards them, but only that his ever-present practically reigned supreme in his decision making. I get the impression you have no read Mein Kampf, or that you do not remember it very well, so that will be my reading recommendation towards you (let us both read each others recommendations, and grow because of it).

>Hey kid, aren't you glad it's you and not your slutty 20 year old sister out here getting shot at?

Attached: nazi virgin.jpg (597x421, 63K)

*practicality

I love him! He is the greatest human in history.

>Nelson Mandela is good
Nigger lover

No he didn't
He never wanted to genocide slavs. In fact Ukrainians treated the Germans as liberators

>In fact Ukrainians treated the Germans as liberators
Yeah because they were hardcore capitalist who were busy trying to starve their people into revolt.

>Chink
>5'9"
Holy fuck that's actually pretty fucking tall
>the virgin General-Secretary
vs.
>the CHAD CHAIRMAN

that it is literally mathematically impossible for that many people to have been gassed in the proposed amount of time
let alone that cyanide in those amounts turns highly explosive thus meaning that all the "gas chambers" would've gone kaboom
personally, i really don't give a shit how many people died because medical advances were had, but numerically, i see no proof that more than, say, 200,000-250,000 people died in the preposed holocaust

my honest opinion is, many details are in any case lost in translation, and that history is written by the victors
true or false, i only know what i can parse from the situation

he was okay. 5/5

Mao was unironically the only successful "national-socialist."

You are polite, and I respect that. I have read both MK, as well as Table Talks and other miscellaneous sources on Hitler's life and views. However, my stance in regards to MK is stated here Since it is a piece of political propaganda from the viewpoint of a Hitler whose sole motive is to be elected (not lay out his true views in a concise manner), one must compare his statements in Mein Kampf to his ACTUAL ACTIONS as Fuhrer of Germany. The actual elected Hitler allowed Slavs, Blacks, Arabs, Asians alike into the Waffen-SS as foreign volunteers. This was during an era where segregation was the norm in Allied countries, meaning Hitler would probably have gotten no flack if he segregated these people. Yet he didn't. Doesn't sound like a hyper-racist white supremacist state to me.

As a bonus, here is a propaganda poster inviting Polish immigrants to work in Germany as citizens.

Attached: immigrant-workers-1.jpg (800x518, 122K)

I don't call the great leap forward a success story.

Here is another one. Somehow, I don't see this a depiction of subhuman peoples.

Attached: immigrant-workers-2.jpg (386x561, 156K)

China today is the only true Nationalist-Socialist country left on Earth- even other deeply patriotic countries like Russia have rampant crony capitalism and are basically run by wealthy (almost entirely (((chosen people))), I might add) oligarchs.

Killed less people than WWII. Now China has the current global hegemon by the balls while Germany is busy trying to suck up to Russia. Sounds like Mao won in the end.

I don't see where you disagree with the other user. You can regard a race as inferior without declaring them subhuman or segregating yourself from them. It's like, yeah, objectively these guys kind of suck in comparison but that's OK and it's not their fault.

China's rapid growth didn't start until they underwent land reforms in the late 70s - early 80s under Deng Xiaoping. Mao on the other hand is mainly known for his incompetence and blood lust.

Hitler wasn't a "hyper-racist white supremacist", but he was definitely a racialist. Hitler talked about ideals in Mein Kampf, and not necessarily actions. If you have not figured it out by now, Hitler was an idealist who was grounded in practicality. He thought that ideals should always be strove towards, because harsh reality, would always stand in the way. You cannot judge a person always, by actual actions, because they are limited by harsh realities.

Attached: 013d78f025511a5164bb4feda239caa7e7df6cb1423bd980810f3df797be0ce3.jpg (1024x768, 163K)

China is a giant overpopulated slave labor camp. The workers are in factories that pay them nothing and it's so miserable there's suicide nets.

>China's rapid growth didn't start until they underwent land reforms in the late 70s - early 80s under Deng Xiaoping.
They had already become an industrial powerhouse. Deng's reforms simply gave them access to international capital, which gave them the push they needed to surpass the west in basically all productive areas. Mao wasn't incompetent and had very little "blood lust" unless you were a landlord (i.e. the chinese version of a jew.) Landlords, much like the jews in Weimar germany., had becomes intolerably influential in feudal Chinese society. They were eliminated by Mao. This act is what made him so monumentally popular. You are basically a jew if you hate Mao.

Attached: e44458ca04daca0856b8226edbb390dd9803dcf699cdc9b52c8cad3f9c0cb364.jpg (960x500, 27K)

Yet their GDP was essentially stagnant until they overwent reforms.
>Mao wasn't incompetent
The retard thought sparrows were a pest and ordered people to kill them on sight, which led to mass starvation due to huge locust swarms eating all the crops since sparrows had previously kept their numbers in check. If that isn't a sign of monumental incompetence, I don't know what is.

By the way, USA also industrialized heavily during the 20th century, but they didn't need to murder millions to achieve that. There's just no excuse for Mao's purges.

Attached: chinagdp.gif (777x467, 8K)

> USA also industrialized heavily during the 20th century, but they didn't need to murder millions to achieve that.
Yes they fucking did. Just look up workplace fatalities during the 20th century in America you fucking tard.

Attached: triangle shirt waist factory.jpg (500x397, 71K)

Cried about daddy issues
Blame the 1 percent for everything socialist
Artfag

Fucking retard.

>workplace fatalities == putting people up against the wall

Both are systemic byproducts. Capitalists ignore one and whine endlessly about the other. Materially they aren't very different at all. America starved millions but made others rich so no one cared. China starved millions too but lifted hundreds of millions out of destitution which of course the west HATED. The west is cancer. Give up.

Capitalists don't starve anyone. In a capitalist society only you can starve yourself.

America is the richest country in the world and China still has shitty enough working conditions that factories have to put up nets so people don't jump out of the windows. Why are you so eager to defend them?

Keep telling yourself that.

>China still has shitty enough working conditions that factories have to put up nets so people don't jump out of the windows.
Because American workers aren't killing themselves in record numbers (far more than are allegedly leaping from factory roofs I might add)?

Attached: drug overdose.png (774x133, 11K)