How can NEETs even compete?

How can NEETs even compete?

>"If the richest 10% of men have, say, four wives each, the bottom 30% of men are doomed to bachelorhood"

economist.com/christmas-specials/2017/12/19/the-link-between-polygamy-and-war?

>"Wherever it is widely practised, polygamy (specifically polygyny, the taking of multiple wives) destabilises society, largely because it is a form of inequality which creates an urgent distress in the hearts, and loins, of young men. If a rich man has a Lamborghini, that does not mean that a poor man has to walk, for the supply of cars is not fixed. By contrast, every time a rich man takes an extra wife, another poor man must remain single. If the richest and most powerful 10% of men have, say, four wives each, the bottom 30% of men cannot marry. Young men will take desperate measures to avoid this state."

>"Polygamous societies are bloodier, more likely to invade their neighbours and more prone to collapse than others are. The taking of multiple wives is a feature of life in all of the 20 most unstable countries on the Fragile States Index compiled by the Fund for Peace, an NGO (see chart)."

Attached: 1534008653616.png (1010x896, 458K)

ins't this just admitting women only marry for wealth

>tfw wealthy family
>find women unappealing
How about we just don't marry, eh?
Neets can take sluts, too.

You're missing the point entirely. Christ

And this is bad, why? Having 30% of the men ready for war is good.

switch polygamy and polyamory and it could be us

the thing is we outnumber them

Poor as shit live with my mom and girls throw themselves at me. Your philosophy is flawed

>wealth
Its more about status
Even then if you faggots weren't so picky and socialized - you could definitely find a hambeast

>idiots treating 'rich' as if it were only about money, ignoring all of the other social currencies used for human value exchanges
normies are FUCKING RETARDED

This is why women shouldn't be allowed to choose their partners. The way their sexuality works will always cause strife among men and hurt society. Their sexuality is completely selfish and comes at the expense of 80% of the population. Giving women freedom is not compatible with a healthy society.

And men marry for looks?

Each sex has a characteristic preference
Success for women - wealth, power, fame, money
Looks for men - boobs, ass, face

Inequality in general is bad

user wants to enslave them and put them in cages - stop whining little faggot

Signs of fertility, moreso than looks.

Until that 30% of men realize that they got the short end of the stick, and rebel because they have nothing to lose.

The article talks about how this practice leads to civil wars, not wars in general.

Faggot white knight cuck. Keep defending these thots, see where that'll get you, pathetic vermin.

>the bottom 30% of men are doomed to bachelorhood

good. I'd make it bottom 50% if it were up to me. cry more, faggots

Not just that it encourages those in the middle to partake in riskier behavior in order avoid being at the bottom.

>mentally ill zoomer "rebelling" to anything

top kek, my "man

those characteristics aren't the whole truth and we know that now. those are just extra things women care about beyond the physical that men usually aren't shallow enough to care about.

But it happened, hell that's how Rome was created , and irc the word rape came about from that event as well.

reminder Marx was right

Attached: 1533175728566.jpg (604x604, 93K)

romans weren't mentally ill zoomers that grew up on the internet. try again

how many of them are willing to marry you and complete your every request? or even have single drop of loyality to you?

The 80-20 rule is the natural state of humanity and we are once again returning to that state. We just went through a couple hundred year blip where we had monogamy because of religion. Weak and loser men either work and die virgins or just fuck off from society. The top men get all the women. The men inbetween get to have the scraps and prostitutes.

user history does not care about your feelings
Look up "rape of the sabine women"
It happened

romans weren't mentally ill zoomers that masturbated to cartoon drawings their whole life when they decided to get pissed. even if you were to try to rape someone, you wouldn't be able to maintain an erection, let alone impregnate. face it, your ancestry stops with you

The difference now is that due to the welfare state, the 20% of the men that women go for are no longer the most successful men. The state provides for the women by taking from successful men, so now the women are fucking subhumans and destroying long genetic lineages. 80/20 only works if women at deprived of equal rights and are more or less slaves.

What... is.... the point?......

iriginal commentshahfhajhlkjsa