Are there any actual issues with women having sexual liberty...

Are there any actual issues with women having sexual liberty? Because it sounds more like incels want women to be forced to settle for them.

Attached: cc28a33965b38d03439289c876379ea4_606.jpg (2508x1672, 125K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.com/news/science-environment-21741912
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

nope. none at all desu. we are a board of peace.

Birthrates below replacement level

it all comes down to this

Humans are naturally polygamous. Given freedom to organise ourselves based on our instincts, a minority of men will get all the women, and the majority will get none.

That's just nature. Women are the selectors, males are the competitors. There's little reason for a male gender to exist beyond constantly fighting among themselves to prove that they have the best genes.

Enforcing monogamy ensures that each man has one woman (provided he contributes to society), making life a lot less stressful for most men, while women still get to have children and raise them as normal. Whether that's worth fundamentally restricting the rights of women is up for you to decide.

>That's just nature. Women are the selectors, males are the competitors.

Feminist bullshit. Name a point in history were women were in a position to select their mate.

Yes, men don't get the corresponding economic liberty, as the State takes their money and uses it to care for women.

It fucks up actual relationships really bad.

The animal world is full of examples of males competing for the females. Just look at most birds.
But in humanity's case, the alpha males (aka the ones desired by women) would just beat the weaker males to death if they tried to compete. That's kind of an ape thing in general, really, gorillas will kill a competitor's babies and then kill the competitor when he tries to stop him from killing the babies, and then he kills all the babies and takes the guy's harem (who willingly follow him and let him kill their babies, by the way).

STDs, moral decay, low birthrates, single parent homes, more murder of unwanted children, decreased ability to pair bond and have successful marriages, virgin rampages, and hedonism.

Women cannot and will never go as hard as men.

Physically. Intellectually. Business-wise.

Women do crossfit. Women make up large proportions of colleges. Women start companies.

But on a one-to-one basis. If you meet and talk to people. Women work, but are broke, content with being basic, content with being absentee single mom, and have no goals. Men still have a semblance of backbone and ambition but cannot meet an honest and humble woman.

I feel Christianity is ridiculous and corrupt in some ways. But things like positive thinking and romantic monogamous love... Christfags got it right.

in the long term, fisherian runaway scenarios

>There's little reason for a male gender to exist
Progression beyond hunter/gatherer society isn't a good enough reason?

Attached: patriarchy_redpill.jpg (2405x917, 917K)

It'll destroy civilization.

Attached: 1530753711986.jpg (2405x917, 761K)

The erosion of the social contract and beta-male productivity which will eventually lead to societal collapse. Mind you, female nature being expressed in this way is a symptom, not the root cause.

Who the fuck cares? Is that really the reason?

why don't white women have hips ? what happened ?

Holy fuck I want to meet that user and have his children.

That's a huge problem. Boomers built society to have permanently increasing population growth and we are incredibly fucked when that stops happening. Pic related. Low birthrates are then used to justify flooding white countries with hordes of nonwhites who breed like rabbits but that causes far more problems than it solves.

Attached: old_people_redpill.png (1181x866, 215K)

Sluts hurt themselves:
>statistically, you're more prone to STDs
>statistically, you're more likely to be depressed
>women have a higher chance of being harmed by a potential sex partner, having many sexual partners shows lack of good thinking
>higher chance of being left suddenly/cheated on
>pregnancy scares
>turning 30 and finding out no one wants to marry you because of your past
>loose pussy full of warts

Sluts hurt their husbands:
>statistically, your eventual marriage will be a lot more turbulent
>sluts lie about their past to their husbands, and when he finds out it destroys the marriage
>sluts are cheaters
>sluts are gold diggers
>sluts make terrible wives
>sluts are incapable of loving their husbands

Sluts hurt their children:
>sluts make up 100% of all abortions
>sluts make terrible mothers
>more than 40% of single mothers live in poverty
>the annual cost for child care averages over 40% what the median income for a single mother is
>children born from teenage mothers are more likely to have health problems, both physically and psychologically
>children without a father figure are more likely to grow up maladjusted or go to prison

Sluts hurt society:
>45% of single mothers receive food stamps, paid by tax payers who can keep their legs shut
>25% of single mothers don't have health insurance, meaning its up to tax payers to pay for her herpes ointments
>sluts demand, year after year, for free birth control from the government so they can keep on slutting it up
>sluts are causing divorce rates to skyrocket, and marriage rates to plummet
>men are literally dropping out of society because they can't find a non-slut to marry
Also, this post. Marriage is the bedrock of a functional society, and marriage is dying in the west, because sluts have killed it.

Attached: slut now, fail to be a wife later, kill self.png (1355x600, 1.33M)

Incels can litterally buy all of the pussy they want.

Also modern men don't want to settle for sexually liberated women or settle at all.

Women desperately need men who'll settle for them and yet, they honestly can't settle because they're too physically and emotionally used up.

Attached: Free independant bisexual woman who don't need no man.jpg (3024x4032, 940K)

I know this is a troll but.

Right now, at this moment.
...women are obsolete.

If every woman on earth died tomorrow humanity would be able to use technology to recreate human beings from conception through gestiation and finally birth.

This is a fact.

>Feminist bullshit.
Nah, its pretty obvious that women are the selectors of and most often the ones that decide if they allow a certain male to be with them.
Women in history were never really in that position to select their mates, but that was in stuff like middle ages were marrige was done for other reasons than love.

If you ask anywhere about women being the selector, people will say its true. That is simply nature's way.
What happens is that while men are born and die out alone to because they didnt have the right genes. Women with bad traits will still most likely reproduce and bring more males to die out alone.

As example, if a woman is short, its not seen as unatractive and will not impact their chances of finding a partner. If a male is short then he will look inferior to other males and will not find a partner as easily.

Female sexuality is not conducive for a stable society since they're hypergamous and only like a small percentage of men. Leaving most men out in the dust is a guaranteed way of destroying any social structure and going back to a state of nature.

Attached: Untitled.png (1867x439, 101K)

evolution happened. the new and improved species emerges to replace the old primitive one.

>muh nature's way
Rape is also natural but I don't hear people who make appeals to nature saying we should allow that.

C-sections

Which is why people are arguing against sexual liberation. Sexual liberation for women is essentially how'd they pick partners in the wild.

>Taking examples of moral sexuality from animals

Man that is how simply life works.
Like birds, the male brids are the ones that most of the time need to be the most pretty , sing the most ...ect, they need to have the
le good genes depeding on species. While female birds dont need to have any of those things, they simply pick and choose wich of the males got their attention the most and mate with them.
Same happens with humans, males are the ones expected to be tall, strong, protective, have wealth, nice face.... etc more than women are expected, men tend to look for things like breasts and butts, as a symbol of fertility.

Most female media is nothing but rape porn.
All of those special rapey eps of those lifetime shows and rape filled movies?
It isn't for men.
By the way, SVU's most popular eps?
Johnny studboy the evil male ravaging some innocent 4/10 and or over the hill thot or even more interesting daddy sexing up daughter/step daughter eps.
Think I'm shitting?

Tell me 1 (one) species where this doesnt happen or apply.
Evey animal that is in any way close relative to the human species has this kind of behaviour. Why would you think us, humans, dont have that sort of thing anymore?
If you put a 5'5 ft female to choose between two indentical males, but one is 5'2 ft and the other is 5'11 ft. Who do you think she will choose.
Same applies for men, but with something like big breasts or small breasts or butt size.

>implying humans aren't animals too and that morality isn't some spook created to make us more obedient

spotted hyenas. Females are dominant in the species, and they fight over the males.

Humans are far superior to animals in many ways.
Animals = instinct based decisions
Humans = intelligent experience based decisions
Animals rarely learn from mistakes, humans do.

bbc.com/news/science-environment-21741912

>Animals = instinct based decisions
>Humans = intelligent experience based decisions
>Animals rarely learn from mistakes, humans do.
This only applies to men. Most women are heartless beasts driven by the most primal instincts. They have no higher thought in their brain, which is why their mating patterns resemble those of animals and this is why giving them sexual freedom is dangerous.

Well shit i guess.
But i dont think that changes the my opinion that humans work close to what most other animals do, like apes for an instance.