Ink’d

Does Jow Forums like women with tats?

AFAF. Asking for a friend.

Attached: A4F6E581-AFAA-4D1E-AE92-B6329DC72CAB.jpg (750x724, 164K)

I don't prefer tattoos, but a woman is a woman.

depends on for what
to fuck? maybe
to date/love? lmao no

YOU ARE BANNED, SO GET OUT!!!! >:(

Attached: latest.png (483x557, 190K)

No, I hate bodymods.
Not really in the position to shove any passable girl off my bed, but it is a major turn-off for me.

Meaning what?
>artist posts real pic
>grill posts censored one

Attached: D987F53B-C364-4482-AE74-77122F1CE417.jpg (741x748, 161K)

Tattoos consistently look terrible and indicate poor decision making.

I have a few tattoos, I wouldn't mind as long as they're not really really bad like pic related

Attached: 3d283d7a-3014-4d16-98ad-867486461e73.jpg (600x600, 47K)

Nope. I do nawt

Attached: ink.jpg (460x584, 31K)

I don't like them on men either, but sometimes the art is cool.

Attached: 1.jpg (600x600, 287K)

Nah, tattoos are most of the time a redflag that the woman is a spoiled whore that likes to show off and not really a mosdest person.

I know this is generalisation, but even psycologists say that is the kind of people that are most prone to get tattoos.

Yeah I like them quite a bit. They indicate a level of unique personality when they're not basic-bitch types. The idea that tattoos are a product of poor decision making is some boomer shit

That is isn't even close to bad, just pretty big.
Seen a bbw slut (not basing that on the tats btw, she just IS one) with halfway professional ink done over her ass... but her arms were seriously full of shit that looked like a 6 year olds doodles.

My fucking sides, holy shit. Tell me this isnt real.
LMAO
Imagine this roastie whoring and luring jews into her house for a fuck, and when the moment of truth comes and they get ready to pound her, they see this and in a matter of seconds they need to question themselves the morality of what they are doing.
As if they are going to give in and validade the girl and her ideas for fucking her, or back off.

Attached: 1509567289019.gif (320x240, 234K)

>They indicate a level of unique personality when they're not basic-bitch types.
Need to fucking disagree with this, i may be a KHV, but i've worked in a place where i got to know a lot of them.
And let me tell you that it really doesnt mean anything. Most of the time i see them its in either vapid whores or fuckboys who you can find at your local bar dacing to whatever is popular on the radio.
That doesnt mean there arent interesting people that have tattoos, but desu the most genuine, kind and modest women that i've known dont have tattoos.

People like the idea of tattoos to lure and make people think they are diferent from others around and chose them for esthetic reasons.
The idea you get that they have "unique" personality is most likely just a halo afftect. Thats my guess.

I like them but only on goth/punk/metal types.
Basic bitch tattoos like feathers and infinity symbols are lame. And anything pop-culture related is cringy and embarrassing.

Attached: 1530386387245.jpg (1440x1951, 470K)

>heavily tattooed (neck, hands, etc)
>work 20 hours per week
>earn double average national wage

No, the tattoos themselves aren't all bad, but they do indicate poor impulse control and disregard for societal norms. People who have them tend to be lower-class.
If you either can't keep from doodling on your body when you see a design you like or you don't give a shit about your outward appearance being appropriate, then I don't want to date you. I've never felt attracted to a guy with tattoos.

This.
And it's non-negotiable.

>validade the girl and her ideas
That's not how the selector role works.

Not 2d not for me

it doesnt matter to me but i do get intimidated by alt type girls because i assume they think i'm some poser conformist or whatever

No, women are beautiful as god made them and tattoos are also usually a signal of immaturity in all people

>I like them but only on goth/punk/metal types.
I love goth girls, I really hate that many are into tattoos though.
Some of the girls I tend to have the best personal chemistry with and they paid money for doing what imo amounts to throwing battery acid on themself. Then you get to know then and they admit in drunk moment how they regret the damn things and think about lasing. GAH!

Attached: 1459141707771X.jpg (540x562, 52K)

I used to think they were cool but then I realized there was nothing worth getting permanently stuck in your skin.

I like women without tats.
But if they do have tats then i prefer the full suicide girl look, I can't stand chicks with some feather on their wrist or some stupid text tattooed on their rib cage,

Depends on the tattoo, but I like a good tattoo when I see one.

I don't have any tattoos but I always liked the idea and a bunch of my friends have them or are tattoo artists.

I thought seriously about getting some of my favourite poem verses on me - something stealthy and very small. However I realised that it would likely smear and the text would be obscured. If I have children, I might get something for them like a flower, their initials, or their birthstone. Maybe.

I find Jow Forums's vitriol against tattoos to be insane.
>"wahhh women can't be robots, I'd date any girl that showed me affection!"
>"uh no fatties and no tats and also no nonvirgins and no girls that have male friends and no girls that are feminists or have a job or want me to eat their pussy..."
Is it just they associate them with trashy girls? Because I'm a virgin at 23 and I still would like to get one done on me. Besides, I thought robots liked the big tiddy goth gf meme and girls into "alt fashion" love tattoos.

Attached: 4FA35A07-7202-4A08-BF0F-5B0A82CC27FE.png (540x583, 423K)

>validade the girl and her ideas
Seems more like something a coalburner or nosehooker would try if she is into getting really rough hatefucks.

see
You can find it as insane as you want, but those damn things make uglier and by now even less of an individual imo.
Then again I am hardly the dick who's approval you'll want. still a fucking poem..pfff
Also, any women has little room to complain about long lists of requirements in partners.

>I'd date any girl that showed me affection!
Dont take everything that is said here too seriously man, I also would be open to date and try to know diferent people, but every one has their standards, why would i try to date a girl that i know for sure that a relationship with her will not work in the long term? or that she is the kind of one that is prone to cheating or has cheated before?
Everyone has standards, people here get are also too bombarded with cases of women cheating and things like that and so they get pretty scared.
Red flag threads are also most of the time people just trolling out and saying stupid shit.

In another topic:
>I might get something for them like a flower, their initials, or their birthstone
Jesus fucking crist man, dont do that shit. That is just the most shallow thing to do.

Everyone has standards man, those that say they dont, are lying. Im a 22 KHV aswell but i still have my own standards and i much likely prefer to stay virgin than ending up with someone that doesnt understand my mindset.
For example,
Its not like i refuse to date with women that are not virgins, but i would refuse a women that likes to do one night stands or casual sex with strangers at parties but not one that simply had past serious relationships.

>make uglier
>who's dick
>"but women have a long list of requirements!!"
But women don't also simultaneously say they'll fuck any dude. Also, can you even into English?

>too seriously
Fair enough.
>long term
>cheating
>red flag threads
I could see how tattoos would correlate with promiscuity, but correlation is not absolute. That's what fags posting in "red flag" threads forget. Red flags are tip-offs based off of immediate interactions, but there are plenty of outliers and I find it absurd how many self proclaimed robots dismiss huge portions of the female population based on stereotypes. It's almost as if they're looking for an excuse not to leave their comfort zone. Scared is an excellent description.

>shallow
Yeah, the birthstone thing is a little New Age-y, but I really like commemorative stuff. I save all the flowers I get at weddings or funerals, I planted a tree when my niece was born, have meticulous photo albums, etc. My friend has my godchildren's initials tattooed on her. I think it's adorable. Not really sure what you mean by shallow.

I do like goths but that doesn't mean they aren't trash in reality. i don't even know if tattoos are a dealbreaker for me at this point, but I know that I will never understand tattoos because I have nothing that I am so passionate about that I am willing to get stuck with needles thousands of times in order to get it permanently etched into my body. I don't have that level of passion so I inherently doubt anyone else does, and think that their tattoo ideas are stupid and short sighted.

>can you even into English?
Not after the second bottle and at nearly 0600, sry.

You couldn't find a bigger red flag in the whole of China

>standards
I'm fine with people having high standards. What I'm not fine with is the same people insisting they have none.
>volcel
>okay with serial monogamy but not those who are casually promiscuous
Exactly! Pic related. Sort of sucks for me since the kind of guys I like (musicians, artists, humanities majors) are either gay, really promiscuous, or not interested in a mousey, awkward dweeb like me. Alas.

>trash in reality
I think it's a media/reality disconnect. In media, goths are always chill. In reality, no one who's actually chill would allocate hours everyday to their looks.

>because I'm not passionate, no one else is
Sounds like a lot of projection. I'm sure a lot of people do get tattoos flippantly, but your generalization is astoundly arrogant. If no one felt extremely passionate about things, how do you think society exists? You really think there aren't scientists out there that would gladly give an arm (let alone get a tattoo) to be the guy who cured Alzheimers or something?

Attached: 39BE0079-DCDF-480F-BE18-A471A7FEF561.jpg (850x400, 52K)

>Red flags are tip-offs based off of immediate interactions, but there are plenty of outliers and I find it absurd how many self proclaimed robots dismiss huge portions of the female population based on stereotypes

That is true, i agree 100%, but again this is only what people say, it doesnt actually mean that they do this.
Calling a red flag something like "has male friends" or "want me to eat their pussy" are absurd and i dont think anyone takes it seriously unless they are far too young for this board. What i would call a red flag is something like "has cheated before", red flag threads are people simply getting carried away by frustration and anger or just plain shitposting to trigger newfags.

No. Nearly all tattoos are embarrassing. If you think that symbol will always be just as meaningful, you're dumb. It's actually a useful indicator that you either don't think about or value the future.

>it's a bird flying out of a cage see it represents my

Fuck off

>Sounds like a lot of projection
It absolutely is projection. did you miss the part where I put the blame on myself and said that I don't understand tattoos, because I don't have the passion? I can't understand a feeling I haven't felt. That's why I still don't understand what love is.

I think you're very level headed but seriously underestimating how stupid this board and it's users are. There are a lot of people that sincerely believe these things, and they're not just newfags. With that said, I agree that there is a huge disconnect between what people intellectually want and what makes their hose jump. I wouldn't be surprised if the same anons bemoaning women that have brightly coloured hair fell madly in love with some pole slurping Stacey because she was Asian and had bangs. Robots often say this in regards to women, but it's true for just about everyone and that's that no one knows what they really want.

>"symbols can't be meaningful over the span of human life"
And what is the Crucifix?

Yes, that's fine, but you also made the tremendous assumption that everyone is like you, which is false.

I don't think you are getting me. I admit that I am wrong. But it's not changing my mindset. I know people may have reasons to get tattoos that I don't understand. But that means I will never assume those ideas cause I will never understand what those reasons are. I will always see tattoos from my own perspective and will always assume they had not enough foresight.

>And what is the Crucifix?

The exception that proves the rule.

But if you can intellectually recognise that there is a discrepancy between your emotional state and that of others, isn't your insistence upon defending your presumption of lack of foresight in of itself a lack of foresight?

Is it really an exception? Even the example you gave (a bird) is a symbol that has had tremendous longevity. The symbolism around doves, ravens, caged birds, canaries, vultures, etc. are ubiquitous and enduring in Western culture.

I think admitting that I don't understand tattoos but have a prejudice about them is enough. Cause there is no way for me to change. I will never find something that I have that much passion about so I will never understand anyone with that much passion. If they get a tattoo out of something like a disregard for their body, not caring that it will be forever a part of them even if they eventually stop loving it or even realize it is a mistake, like if they still get one anyways because they just don't care about that, then I have a fundamental disagreement with them on something. But if they have tattoos out of a way that I find acceptable but still don't understand, then I will fail to understand.

>fail to understand
That's fine. I wasn't saying you need to understand. Obviously you need to do what you feel. I was taking issue with you presenting your feels as facts. I hope it didn't seem like I was insisting upon you dating someone you're not into.

I wasn't saying that my feels were facts. I was saying my feels were feels. You didn't sound like you were insisting on that, it just sounded like you didn't get what I was saying.

No i hate tatoos on anybody. They look ugo.

I hate them. It doesn't mean women with tats can't be nice, but the ones that do are usually the wise old granny types, the ones I can hold a long conversation with, but not someone I'd go out with. Also very counterintuitive, but the tiny ones are the worst.
Bonus points for a tiny butterfly, a flower or initials on the wrist. That shit is repulsive.

>tiny
>initials
>flower
Hmmm, user, could it be you didn't like my post lol? But I could see that. Smaller tattoos are probay more popular with boring Stacies whereas larger ones would suggest someone more committed to the aesthetic.

>And what is the Crucifix?
A-user I...

Attached: 170.jpg (300x100, 26K)

I didn't say anything for or against Christianity.

don't like them, i think they are by and large tasteless and when they aren't they aren't attractive. i'm okay with cultural tattoos i suppose or if you were part of a military outfit or something.

What are the motives?
I can dig good tattoos, even marry and have children with a tattooed girl, as long as her personality is good.

People with tats are all criminals
#weilreinehautreinhaut

You literally named one of a thousand different reasons people get tattoos

>They indicate a level of unique personality
yeah that's why you see almost everyone now with tats they're not unique they're all retarded

I made my post replying to OP, not you. Only saw what you had to say after hitting the post button. My opinion still stands that I think that wrist tattoos are hideous. They're the modern trampstamp.

I get them for cultural reasons. Not joking.

what do you work as? i must know

I was just joking, user. I think wrist tattoos are cute, but I assume they'd probably be very painful.

Go on...

No, tattoos are trashy.