How come you retards are dumb enough to think a foreskin is useless and dirty?

How come you retards are dumb enough to think a foreskin is useless and dirty?

We have them for a reason.

And big medicine promotes male genital mutilation to sell the operation to parents. It's a billion dollar industry.

Attached: 38851741_2066005523662543_6489389438987141120_n.jpg (768x960, 50K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/gCSWbTv3hng?t=45s
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I don't think that. If I had a son I'd never mutilate him.

The practice is disgusting and abominable and should be illegal to perform on children for nontherapeutic reasons (and actual medical indications for foreskin amputation are extremely rare; most "medical reasons" are fraud/bullshit).

Attached: 09695.png (720x960, 680K)

You can't post furry porn here, enjoy your ban m8

what she the odds of me getting an uncut bf in the United States? I really want one

She's right, and so are you.

Attached: 36733018_808835312643345_16172961346093056_n.jpg (960x428, 96K)

Yes, removing foreskin is disgusting. No wonder only (((they))) and muslims do it.

It desentisized the penis making sexx less pleasurable for the man. It hightens the risk of infection and injury as foreski is not protecting it and keeping it moist.

The practice might have had some befits 3000 years ago in the middle of a fuck-off desert, but right now it is harful an evil.

Among latino men, pretty high desu

When I learned they harvested baby foreskins and women used them for skincare it all made sense.

im 5'3" and taller than half of Latino men in the US. When I see a mother with her children sometimes I cant tell if its just the older sister or not.

Attached: 1423580703293.jpg (919x868, 106K)

really? for some reason I thought they would be cut

I'm Latino and 5'8". Want my tiny smelly uncut NEET cock?

White Americans are cut out of tradition.

In the late 1800s, doctors promoted genital mutilation as a way to stop their kids from the sin of masturbation, so that they didn't go to hell.

youtu.be/gCSWbTv3hng?t=45s

Don't call it uncut.

Also 99% of men with foreskin are not dirty down there. It's not smelly.

>Also 99% of men with foreskin are not dirty down there. It's not smelly.
Well at least he was honest.

I detect someone without a foreskin is behind this post.

Attached: 38926254_2154844884763006_5625277422447362048_n.jpg (403x402, 26K)

this. I detect the "honest" person lies about ever having a foreskin to begin with.

Would being unable to pull my foreskin back due to it being way to tight at the tip be a valid medical reason? It was valid enough to me, at least. I'd rather not be unable to clean my dick when I shower.

No, my penis is actually small and smelly. I also have phimosis. I don't care about the war between cut and uncut, I just don't have self worth and see no need to lie about my penis to anonymous people online.

Your parents might have forced retracted you to clean under your foreskin as an infant.

Also enjoy loosing 70% of the nerves on your dick. No shit talk on my part can replace that.

You know, nobody is cut as an infant in Finland. Yet only 1 in 16,000 get cut as an adult.
You are more likely to need to amputate a leg than remove your foreskin.

Sounds like your parents fucked your penis up retracting when you were too young.

I can tell you're lying, because you act like there is a war between cut and intact.

This issue has always been about child abuse, not about what is better.

So it's clear that you're lying about having a foreskin.

I've filled my quota for putting in effort today. I can't convince you that I have a small smelly phimosis peepee without posting a pic but nobody wants to see that atrocity.

You don't need to get circumcised to treat phimosis.

The fuck you on about? My health insurance paid for my circumcision.

Lmao
So somebody did pay
The ones doing the circumcision profited
Lmao
Youre retarded

Well better circumcised than having a phimosis.

>big medicine

A bit too subtle for me but that's one way to name (((them)))