Why did he do it?

>Every single mass shooting leads to MORE gun control laws in various states

LOL, even after first graders were annihilated in Sandy hook, there have been virtually NO gun control laws anywhere...if anything, now everybody wants to give out MORE guns to "protect from the people with guns".

Attached: killed to death.jpg (500x373, 38K)

Actual CIAnigger detected

>his extensive, violent, and disturbing CP collection attests to this
there's literally no proof that this exists.

CP is the easiest thing to plant on someone. who is going to rush to his defense?

he probably did it because he found out something the government was doing and wanted to inspire gun-owning americans to do something.

since this was totally planned, he would have just deleted his CP

Over achiever wanted to beat the record.

>abcnews.go.com/US/las-vegas-gunmans-computer-child-pornography-disturbing-search/story?id=52467413
> Several hundred images of child pornography were also found on the hard drive of Paddock's laptop, according to the report.

bullshit. it was planted. also how could they find it without a hard drive?

abcnews.go.com/US/las-vegas-shooters-laptop-missing-hard-drive/story?id=50709285
>Las Vegas shooter's laptop missing its hard drive

The guy was a literal boomer, he wasn't bad looking for an old guy and he had a wife

autism \ original semen

He removed the hard-drive, eventually they found it and when they searched it they found the child pornography.

People tend to find more evidence along the course of an investigation that they didn't find at the beginning, and seeing as though the fact that the hard-drive was missing at the initial investigation was news, it stands to reason that they were actively searching for it.

>date of the report stating the hard drive as missing
Oct 25, 2017, 12:15 PM ET

>date of the report discussing details of the recovered hard-drive
Jan 19, 2018, 3:50 PM ET

2 months give or take is enough time to find an intentionally hidden hard-drive.

Explain what the impetus would be of dregging up child porn that the public won't even see and putting it on his computer?

>eventually they found it
where exactly?

>they found the child pornography.

allegedly. has this ever been proven? CP is the easiest thing to plant. literally nobody ever proved it, and they won't. it's bullshit

>intentionally hidden hard-drive.
yeah, and yet he wouldn't delete the CP? bullshit

more nonsense:
independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/las-vegas-shooting-latest-child-abuse-images-stephen-paddock-fbi-marilou-danley-a8169491.html
>Child abuse images, snorkel equipment and handwritten notes were among the items found in the hotel room of Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock, police have revealed.
child abuse images? kek

>unlike other mass shooters, Paddock did not leave a manifesto or suicide note explaining his actions.
bullshit

we know the government lies. they have been caught doing it plenty of times.

>Police also found notepads strewn around the room which had technical notes and reminders such as "unplug phones" and measurements including distance and bullet drop calculations.
wow, looks like he was really planning it out. but he didn't even try to delete his CP.

>The preliminary report said police had found ?several hundred images? of child pornography on a computer hard drive when they searched the four laptops belonging to Paddock, but officers are still investigating the source of the images.

four laptops? protip: a photo of a fecund 17yo with massive tits is legally "child porn". it could have been one of those hot girl ads saved on his hd in his temp folder from going to a torrent website or even Jow Forums.

once they mentioned CP i knew they were covering this shit up. only total mindless lemmings lap up this shit, as if the police aren't crooked at all. the dude meticulously planned all of it, removed his laptop HD, but forgot to delete his cp? top fucking kek

>Explain what the impetus would be of dregging up child porn that the public won't even see and putting it on his computer?
they can't release the hard drives now. we can never know what is on them directly, we only have to get their "expert reports."

the government can easily plant that shit, or simply lie about it and there will never be a defense.

beforeitsnews.com/v3/scandals/2013/2431142.html
>New Child Porn Planting Virus Maybe Setting People Up As Pedophiles

>dailycaller.com/2018/01/19/stephen-paddock-child-porn-las-vegas-mandalay-bay/
>Stephen Paddock had hundreds of images of child pornography in his possession when he carried out the Las Vegas mass shooting on Oct. 1, according to a report released by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department on Friday.

why wouldn't he just fucking delete it before committing mass murder? "oops"

>The child porn was found on a Dell laptop computer in the Mandalay Bay hotel room from where Paddock slaughtered 58 people attending a Jason Aldean concert below. The report says that "several hundred images of child pornography were located on the computer's hard drive."

so... the same laptop that had no HD?

when i hear anything about cp i just assume it's made up. that is such a vile accusation, and it is so easy to fake. it's also something that i think very few people are actually into. and in this case, of course a guy who killed all these people could also be into child porn, but there are other reasons they would make this claim. for instance, distracting from other things; this plays into the impression that he was just a sadistic maniac, with no motive.

and i know there is a motive, because the fbi is covering a bunch of shit up, right out in the open.

if they say there is CP, this is an excuse to limit the number of officials who are allowed to look at it, if they are covering up something that is on it and they want the fewest number of people possible to know about it.

>where exactly?
How on earth should I know? When they initially searched the room they found several laptops and only one of them notably was missing a hard drive, what they later found on it is a good indication of why

>allegedly
A police and forensics unit discovered this. A conspiracy of this level would require an immense amount of human cooperation which people do not even devote to mundane, necessary things like operating ones car safely.

>CP is the easiest thing to plant
I really doubt that. I think probably the easiest thing to plant would be a physical object like narcotics that could be shown to the public without repercussion.

I can't see any reason why they would put something in a place as a red herring when the people they're trying to convince it's there will literally never even see it. If anything I could see telling people something's there when it's not, but the idea they'd plant something and tamper with evidence just to spread a rumor is pretty ludicrous.

>yeah and yet he wouldn't delete the CP
Why would he do that if he could just keep his horde? He just put it in what he thought was a secure location in case he was able to make it out alive so he could return to it.

>child abuse images? kek
There is nothing either funny or out of the ordinary about that statement. They're images of children being abused which he viewed for sexual pleasure. Not unusual behavior for psychopath who enjoys watching others, especially the vulnerable, suffer.

>bullshit...we know the government lies
Sure, but there doesn't seem to me a reason the government would have to lie about him not having a manifesto. If anything, this would be a supreme waste of a platform. Say the government engineered this catastrophe in order to criminalize/silence someone/group/ideology they don't like. Why instead of saying the manifesto is supportive of that group/ideology/person would they say it's senseless? That's the opposite of the goal of a false-flag.

>but he didn't even try to delete his CP
no, he hid it in a location secure enough to elude people whose entire job it is to find things for two months and encrypted it well enough to require a computer forensics agent to decode what was there.

I'm sure he envisioned a method of escape (he tried to shoot the SWAT team through the door which did wound one, he researched the SWAT team to figure out what they'd to, etc.) meaning he definitely planned to potentially make it out alive. Had this plan been successful he'd want his stash.

>a photo of a fecund 17 yo
a) Considering this is a man who killed almost 60 people for no reason but pleasure it seems it confounds me you think it's impossible for him to enjoy images of defenseless children being tortured and raped for pleasure. This is what people like him enjoy, almost exclusively.

b) Nothing about what you've said excuses child pornography in any way. In fact, looking at a 'fecund 17yo' online nude knowing the severity of the repercussions means you are either literally mentally retarded or have a perverted obsession with the under-aged, which is equally disturbing especially given that females ~age 18 face the highest rates of sexual assault and violence.

>only totally mindless lemmings...as if the police aren't crooked at all
You are just a brainlet and know nothing about forensics.

Even if we had the most corrupt police system on the planet it doesn't give a motivation for carrying out such a massive scheme that would require tons of money and cooperation all for nothing. If anything a highly corrupt police team would not be capable of doing so, as organizing all of this teamwork between separate, corrupt organizations would be a nearly impossible task.

>When they initially searched the room they found several laptops
that's not what they said originally. story changing... why would he bring multiple laptops with him?

>A police and forensics unit discovered this.
allegedly
>A conspiracy of this level would require an immense amount of human cooperation which people do not even devote to mundane, necessary things like operating ones car safely.

no it wouldn't. literally 5 people could accomplish it, maybe even less. you're exaggerating hard. once it is labelled "has CP" only a very small number of people can ever see it again. the forensics computer guy just has to be told to say it, it's not even hard.

>I can't see any reason why they would put something in a place as a red herring when the people they're trying to convince it's there will literally never even see it. If anything I could see telling people something's there when it's not, but the idea they'd plant something and tamper with evidence just to spread a rumor is pretty ludicrous.
not at all.

>Why would he do that if he could just keep his horde?
why would he even take out one of the HD's if he intended to keep everything? he could have easily encrypted it, could have simply made a .RAR file with a long password.

>He just put it in what he thought was a secure location in case he was able to make it out alive so he could return to it.
bullshit. seems like he didn't even encrypt it. he removed a whole HD from a laptop, rendering it completely fucking useless. what good is a laptop without a HD when you apparently have other laptops with you? makes no fucking sense.

>There is nothing either funny or out of the ordinary about that statement. They're images of children being abused which he viewed for sexual pleasure. Not unusual behavior for psychopath who enjoys watching others, especially the vulnerable, suffer.
it's totally unusual, mr expert. you know people who enjoy CP? how does an old man who can't even encrypt manage to get cp?

>Sure, but there doesn't seem to me a reason the government would have to lie about him not having a manifesto
sure there is: they didn't want anyone to know the information on it. that's enough of a reason to claim it doesn't exist, and to plant CP (or simply lie and say it's on there) so nobody gets to review the HD, which was allegedly missing
>no, he hid it in a location secure enough to elude people whose entire job it is to find things for two months and encrypted it well enough to require a computer forensics agent to decode what was there.
[citation needed]

you said it was just on another laptop in the same room. except all initial reports said there was 1 laptop, with a missing HD

>
I'm sure he envisioned a method of escape (he tried to shoot the SWAT team through the door which did wound one, he researched the SWAT team to figure out what they'd to, etc.) meaning he definitely planned to potentially make it out alive. Had this plan been successful he'd want his stash.

he wanted to escape with all sorts of different laptops? why not just leave his CP in some hidden place. it makes no sense at all.

>Considering this is a man who killed almost 60 people for no reason but pleasure
that is your opinion based on testimony by authorities, who are known to lie. they took MONTHS to release little tidbits of information. there is no actual proof there is no motive, that is what they want you to think

>it seems it confounds me you think it's impossible for him to enjoy images of defenseless children being tortured and raped for pleasure
i think if he did he was smart enough to encrypt it. the dude made MILLIONS by calculating math in his head, learning how to win money betting in card games based on mathematical propability.
not smart enough to make a .rar file with a password apparently, any 90-IQ robot on this forum could do that. plenty of un-crackable encryption software exists, you know, for free?

People don't just become psychopaths in later old age and do shit like this. They're always crazy earlier and generally crazy people don't become wealthy. The only exceptions are the exceptionally charming sociopathic serial killers like ted bundy or gacy or whatever. And that's serial killing, this was a MASS SHOOTING. Mass killings are done as a huge outburst due to either political, religious reasons or some kind of personal angst or vengeance fantasy.

This guy doesn't fit the fucking profile AT ALL and I don't believe he did it for a fucking minute.

>b) Nothing about what you've said excuses child pornography in any way. In fact, looking at a 'fecund 17yo' online nude knowing the severity of the repercussions means you are either literally mentally retarded or have a perverted obsession with the under-aged, which is equally disturbing especially given that females ~age 18 face the highest rates of sexual assault and violence.
maybe he didn't know their age?

it just seems utterly ridiculous to me, so fucking unbelievable that he wouldn't have, at the very least, encrypted something. it wasn't just apparently naked pics of 17 year olds (which you may not even know they aren't 18, pics don't come with age labels) but children being tortured and abused.

how the fuck does someone even get that stuff? on the dark web. you need to be somewhat savvy to get there, savvy enough to encrypt it. those websites have fucking guides on them on how to encrypt. it makes no sense, this stuff isn't easy to find. he allegedly removed 1 HD and had multiple laptops but didn't remove the HD of the one with brutally torturing children? bullshit

>Even if we had the most corrupt police system on the planet it doesn't give a motivation for carrying out such a massive scheme that would require tons of money and cooperation all for nothing.
you're being dishonest. it's not a "massive scheme" and it requires literally no money to pull of this simple hoax. you just tell the forensics computer guy to say "there was CP on it" and they write it down and the news reports that based on the police report they read. or someone important (who didn't see the pics himself) says it in a microphone in front of video cameras. it does not take much of a 'conspiracy' to do that, most people wouldn't even be in on it... and if they were, they would probably be totally willing to keep up the hoax. what's the point of losing your job by defending a mass murderer from a CP charge? very few people probably ever saw the hard drive, you're clueless

You dumb ass fuck. Ever hear of the SAFE act? Passed in the middle of the night with no oversight as a direct response to sandy hoax?

>that's not what they initially said, story changing....
Then what did they initially say? What is the very first report that came out?

You do recognize that an investigation is a continual process during which things are uncovered right?

You do realize that different news outlets are written and edited by literally hundreds of different people meaning they choose to write about things from hundreds of perspectives right?

>allegedly
Everything could be alleged unless you prove it yourself. Allegedly if you throw yourself out of a building you'll go splat on the ground because of gravity, you don't have to prove that by doing it or looking at it yourself. You, like every non-brainlet in this world, simply investigate and come to understand the evidence well enough that you can apply the principles to ascertain the outcome of the situation.

>literally 5 people could accomplish it
No. There have been hundreds of interviews, news outlets, news stories, videos, evidence photos, testimonies, eulogies, memorials, interviews, etc. that emerged after this incident. Were this all fake each one of those things would have needed to be informed of whatever grand scheme you're imagining and coerced into doing so. You're so stupid.

>the forensics computer guy
Confirmed you have no clue what you're talking about

>not at all
the onus of evidence is on you my friend

>why would he even take out one of the hard drives...he could've encrypted it...simply made a .rar file

If you, knowing absolutely nothing about computer science or having common sense in general, think of that plan then it is too simple to evade authorities. A computer forensics expert can bypass all passwords and doesn't usually interface with the UI component of a computer whatsoever. They deal with the data structures, which are usually hidden from the user:

computer.howstuffworks.com/computer-forensic.htm

>what good is a laptop without a HD
please avail yourself to google.com

MKULTRA or just a gun runner who got set up

Attached: CIA Troy McClure.jpg (640x484, 44K)

>his extensive, violent, and disturbing CP collection attests to this
Didn't they find it on his hard drive after they had already announced that the hard drive on his computer was lost?

False flag for the purposes of pushing gun control, like most of them

Attached: ascended jones.png (400x400, 395K)

>you know people who enjoy CP?
Personally in my life i have been targeted and abused by child molesters. So while i no longer have contact with such persons i can completely imagine them doing so. You can just go onto /b/ and find plenty of people who enjoy child pornography it's literally one click away.

>an old man who can't even encrypt
I'm not understanding where you're getting the idea he was incapable of encrypting this data. He made a number of decisions and plans in this mass murder that showed he was incredibly calculating and covered most of his tracks.

He was always a psychopath. He had been collecting items like these for years, and I'm sure over in the Philippines he committed tons of heinous crimes, it's just nobody cares over there.

Most psychopaths begin their more serious crimes in mid to late life.

For example John Wayne Gacy didn't commit his first offense on-record until he was 25 years old.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wayne_Gacy#First_offenses

>it's just nobody cares over there
Unironically kill yourself, retard

>Personally in my life i have been targeted and abused by child molesters.
how many of them were high IQ people, in a marriage, who were millionaires?

>So while i no longer have contact with such persons i can completely imagine them doing so.
yeah i understand. he did something evil we know he did. and having pics of molesting children is also evil. so it makes sense a purely evil man would have both, right? but actually very few people are into that shit. also, someone as intelligent as him (and he certainly was smart) could have easily encrypted shit like that or deleted it before his planned and calculated rampage.

>You can just go onto /b/ and find plenty of people who enjoy child pornography it's literally one click away.
they can't post it on the website though legally (it's reported to police), and very few prefer it. "plenty" lol nah.

>I'm not understanding where you're getting the idea he was incapable of encrypting this data. He made a number of decisions and plans in this mass murder that showed he was incredibly calculating and covered most of his tracks.
he didn't even encrypt his CP, why? he was obviously capable of encrypting shit, but he didn't encrypt alleged photos of naked children being physically tortured? bullshit. if you have CP and you know how to encrypt, you do it. at the very least you put it in a password protected .rar file

>He was always a psychopath
yeah and thus anything evil he could have possibly done, if alleged, must be absolutely accepted.
you believe anything you're told, don't you?

are you a girl? honestly, you sound like a fucking girl the way you are totally incapable of thinking logically and just want to accept any evil thing about it. you hate this man, obviously, but you should still try to be objective.

it
does
not
add
up

>He had been collecting items like these for years, and I'm sure over in the Philippines he committed tons of heinous crimes, it's just nobody cares over there.
you're sure?

As I've said before many times. Lost =/= gone forever. It was hidden, they found it. When they found it there was CP on it.

>an emergency bill isn't a reasonable response when dozens of kindergartners are murdered in cold blood

>maybe he didn't know their age
You are like a little babby.

Fortunately it seems you haven't come across any child porn in your life. Consider yourself lucky.

When i was a kid, snooping around on tumblr where i had no business being, i happily put my age in my bio expecting to make lots of 'new friends' and get tons of cool followers who liked all my amaaaazing content! Instead what i got were many many child pornography blogs following me and sending me lecherous messages. The content of these blogs ranged from 'soft-core' child pornography (children usually 7-8 years old doing gymnastics, playing outside, exposed panties etc.) to children being beaten and tortured for sexual pleasure.

I never searched for this content, it was brought TO ME through blogs (with complicated alphanumeric blog URLs that you wouldn't find without a tip, much like dark web sites which require a spyder).

Long story short

a) People who have child pornography usually know exactly how old the kids are, they usually are not developed in the slightest. Hell I even found images of BABIES i'm talking toddlers getting molested.

b) Child pornography is not always """"tasteful nudes""""" as some proponents like to call it, it ranges from the outright rape of children to torture and murder of them for sexual pleasure.

>how the fuck does someone even get that stuff?
As I said it's not even hard. You just have to know someone or in my case someone has to reach out to you. The things I saw disturbed me deeply even to this day. You don't have to be savvy at all to see them. I was not savvy at 10 or 12 years old, nor did i ever want to see children being beaten or put into appliances and drowned/burned to death.

>>an emergency bill isn't a reasonable response when dozens of kindergartners are murdered in cold blood

Wow you're right. I guess that Enabling Act was justified too, I mean they burned the fucking Reichstag.

>Personally in my life i have been targeted and abused by child molesters. So while i no longer have contact with such persons i can completely imagine them doing so. You can just go onto /b/ and find plenty of people who enjoy child pornography it's literally one click away.

PROTIP: if you go on /b/ yourself and see cp, it downloads all those images to your PC into your temp folder

and those images can be recovered even if deleted, unless the exact part of the HD was wiped over. usually 3 wipes is good.

FACT: you can literally have CP detectable on your computer just by going to a /b/ thread with CP. this is especially true if your HD is never at risk of being filled.

>Fortunately it seems you haven't come across any child porn in your life. Consider yourself lucky.
nope, i have seen it. didn't enjoy it. but i just kept scrolling or closed the tab

>When i was a kid, snooping around on tumblr where i had no business being, i happily put my age in my bio expecting to make lots of 'new friends' and get tons of cool followers who liked all my amaaaazing content! Instead what i got were many many child pornography blogs following me and sending me lecherous messages. The content of these blogs ranged from 'soft-core' child pornography (children usually 7-8 years old doing gymnastics, playing outside, exposed panties etc.) to children being beaten and tortured for sexual pleasure.

if you saw these pics, or opened a page with them, they saved to a temp folder on your HD. unless you did a wipe of your HD and/or wrote over the data, it could have been recovered with free software, certainly something the police have

>I never searched for this content, it was brought TO ME through blogs (with complicated alphanumeric blog URLs that you wouldn't find without a tip, much like dark web sites which require a spyder).
do you have the same computer? it might still be able to be recovered from your HD. especially when pics are like a few kilobytes and HDs are many gigabytes or even a terabyte

>As I said it's not even hard.
neither is encrypting

When i was about 14 years old a friend of mines dad (a jew no less) kept inviting me to parties he claimed i would meet celebrities like miley cyrus and britney spears at, he later revealed to me they were orgies with men who'd love me because i was 'so young and fresh'.

Most sociopaths are very logical and have cutthroat ambition. They do very well in high positions of power because that's all they want to do, and they care about little else than their own prominence. Many high-achieving and influential people are later revealed to be this way.

>actually very few people are into that shit
How would you even know? And not caring about others, having zero empathy, and being an extreme sadist all go hand in hand with collecting and watching child porn, especially child torture porn as he clearly had (child abuse images). It's the same concept as porn sites like this:

motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/z4m5kx/the-people-who-get-off-to-animals-being-trampled

Very few people murder ~60 young adults at a music festival too, it only takes one insane person to do so. Many psychopaths are considered logical and do well in logic-based careers.

>they cant post it on the website legally
The question you asked was: "You know people who enjoy CP?" And my answer was not "they can post it legally" it was "you can easily find such people on /b/".

>he didn't even encrypt his CP
WHY DO YOU KEEP SAYING THIS? WHERE IS THE PROOF???? I AM PRETTY SURE HE ENCRYPTED IT

>anything evil he could have possibly done must be accepted
au contraire! I don't think a single thing stephen paddock did was at all acceptable. I don't know where you're getting that impression but i have zero sympathy for that man and think he should've never been born. Psychopathy and sociopathy are not excuses for anything imo people who have them should be screened at birth and just locked away, they're incredibly dangerous and exist almost solely to cause harm to others.

He didn't like country music?

>are you a girl?
Yes I am a girl. You are the one in this discussion who is thinking highly illogically, not engaging the majority of the points I've brought up, and are completely unable to follow a single line of thought.

>try to be objective
When was I being emotional here?

>It doesn't add up
I've asked you at least 3 times to explain a plausible counter-theory and each time you've failed to do so. I've proven my theories with all the known data I have, exhaustive discussion, and thought out possibilities. The onus of proof is on you to explain your hair-brained scheme.

>you're sure?
My grandmother (by marriage) is Filipina. She's confirmed it's a mad house, and in most poor countries children are considered more of a burden than a blessing. Most parents are happy to make a few bucks off of them instead of spending a few bucks feeding them, even if that means letting some nasty man rape them. Another similar story explains how easy it is to do, this man got away with doing this for a number of years:

theguardian.com/world/2016/may/31/live-streaming-child-sex-abuse-family-business-philippines

I'm not there, I'm not an investigator, I wasn't with him, I have no eyewitness proof. But considering the circumstances I'm able to make an educated assumption that he did so.

He was showing what one man could do, when civilization falls apart in the next 15 years due to the climate/food it'll be a massacre.

If this was their attempt at pulling off a false-flag it was incredibly puny! Hitler's one act got him to the position of most powerful in all Germany without checks, this measley bill had 43 no's, doesn't centralize power to any individual, only works in one state, and doesn't ban but rather loosely limits the extent that firearms can be used. Game-changer there! It's totally worth it to involve 28 families in a massive theatrical performance just to call more types of guns assault rifles (but still let you buy them), limit how many magazines you can use, do background checks on gun buyers, make sure gun buyers are clinically sane, report lost or stolen guns, keep guns away from actual felons, and get a certification that says you know how to use the thing.

>WHY DO YOU KEEP SAYING THIS? WHERE IS THE PROOF???? I AM PRETTY SURE HE ENCRYPTED IT
they didn't say he did. and if he did, that stuff can't really be decrypted. you clearly don't know jack shit

it's far, far more likely the temp image situation described here happened rather than encryption being broken: or most likely however is that it's fake and/or planted

>au contraire! I don't think a single thing stephen paddock did was at all acceptable. I don't know where you're getting that impression but i have zero sympathy for that man and think he should've never been born.
you're literally repeating what i said. you think he's pure evil. thus, you think if some other unrelated evil is alleged against him, it's probably true. in reality, he's only slightly more likely to have that stuff than the average person. but that's all pointless to discuss, the story is so full of holes it's basically swiss cheese at this point

>they're incredibly dangerous and exist almost solely to cause harm to others.
yeah whatever. a lot of people that knew him said he was nice. he helped people with money. he wasn't pure evil, and the whole "no motive" think reeks of lies. they're covering something up for sure

>Yes I am a girl.
post tits or GTFO

>You are the one in this discussion who is thinking highly illogically, not engaging the majority of the points I've brought up, and are completely unable to follow a single line of thought.
your entire point is "but he was wicked, and so is CP, so he probably did it just because they said"

a coverup wouldn't even require 10 people at all. once they say CP is on it, it's game over -- like nobody else can even look at it. and it took so long for them to say it, total bullshit!

>I've asked you at least 3 times to explain a plausible counter-theory and each time you've failed to do so. I've proven my theories with all the known data I have, exhaustive discussion, and thought out possibilities. The onus of proof is on you to explain your hair-brained scheme.
bullshit, i explained plenty. you have failed to refute the fact that it could have been just bullshit deleted pics from a temp folder on a page he went to at some point.

FACT: if someone uploaded CP on this page right now it would SAVE TO YOUR COMPUTER and simply deleting your temp files wouldn't totally remove it from your pc if you used a recovery tool

basically, if someone posted CP in this thread, you closed the tab, then tomorrow the police took your laptop.... THEY COULD FIND IT ON YOUR HD

check out: sevenforums.com/tutorials/276046-cipher-command-overwrite-deleted-data-windows.html

^^ you would have to use that to truly delete it, or some similar software

>When was I being emotional here?
all over the place. you're clearly emotionally invested in it because you were molested as a young girl

I'm literally taking data systems and algorithms right now what are your credentials? i think it is YOU who has no clue what they're talking about.

>most likely
BASED ON WHAT. Probabilities are based on potential outcomes and potential counfoundings. Based on what do you assume it was a 'temporary image' which i do not believe for one minute.

>you're literally repeating what i said
you stated that I was excusing his behavior by labelling him as evil. I was not. It was more of a damnation.

>if you think some other unrelated
I didn't just pull this out of thin air I have REASON to believe he does (these are the results of the investigation and I can't see why they'd lie about that). You, however, have no reason to explain why you think he wouldn't do so.

>he's only slightly more likely to have that stuff than the average person
No he is not. And the average person does not visit sites like /b/. You are a massive fool.

>the story is so full of holes
No it isn't. You've suggested holes, I've shown you reasons why they aren't there. You're grossly overestimating the veracity of your conspiracy although it's extremely tenuous.

>a lot of people who knew him said he was nice
Most sociopaths and psychopaths put on a very charming and outgoing front to mask their true nature.

WHAT WOULD THEY BE COVERING UP?

Maybe he didn't think he was tall enough, or not ugly enough or rich enough?

/thread

>clearly
Ok, then show me an example. Should be easy if there are soo many.

>post tits or GTFO
cope.

>your entire point is he was wicked and so is cp he probably did it because they said
No it isn't. My argument is:

The police said he had cp on his computer
I believe the results of this investigation

Your argument is:
He could not have had CP on his computer because:

If he did he would've encrypted it
CP is innocuous, he probably had mild things they're calling CP
CP is hard to find
They're lying and saying he had it when he didn't

My counter-arguments are:
There's no reason to believe he didn't encrypt it
CP is not innocuous
CP is not really that hard to find
Why would they lie about this? Give me one good reason?

>i explained plenty
Oh? Then you wouldn't mind repeating the imaginary motive of yours. Otherwise i don't believe you

>temp folder
This is just not a true thing. Once again proof or gtfo

>save to your computer
proof or gtfo

>check out
That is not hard to do you fool this link is very simple, it walks you step by step how to delete certain files once they're in a level that is generally inaccessible to deletion by someone who doesn't know how to talk to the inner parts of the computer.

This article also explains a method for DELETION. As I've already stated I don't think he ever wanted to delete those files. He most likely wanted to save them for later if he ever escaped.

>I'm literally taking data systems and algorithms right now what are your credentials? i think it is YOU who has no clue what they're talking about.
quit trolling. decent encryption can't really be broken and it's easy to plant this shit, and it's easy to have it saved on a HD (temp folder) even if you weren't trying to save them for later. read about cipher command and how files are deleted: >BASED ON WHAT.
based on the fact that encryption isn't easily fucking broken, and is in fact mostly unbreakable. they would have had to brute force the password... the government has failed miserably at trying to decrypt terrorist shit all the time

>Based on what do you assume it was a 'temporary image' which i do not believe for one minute.
yeah that's just a fucking fact idiot. images are saved in your temp folder and they aren't fully deleted without cipher command... you're being stupid right now. if i posted CP on this page it would download to your computer and not be fully removed without special software for it, it can be recovered. see: ccleaner.com/recuva

>I didn't just pull this out of thin air I have REASON to believe he does
because you're close minded KEK

>these are the results of the investigation and I can't see why they'd lie about that
plenty of reasons why. they lie all the fucking time. i've been a victim of police lying myself, just to make themselves look better.

>You, however, have no reason to explain why you think he wouldn't do so.
i already did. if he encrypted it they couldn't have decrypted it. nobody said they decrypted anything at all. it could have been a recovered temp file that was deleted, easily!

>No he is not. And the average person does not visit sites like /b/. You are a massive fool.
yet fact is if you go on a CP thread it saves to your pc. and it can be recovered if you delete it and don't use software or commands like cipher... you can't refute these facts

>why did he do it?
>he was tall, not ugly and rich..
who is this guy?

>No it isn't. You've suggested holes, I've shown you reasons why they aren't there. You're grossly overestimating the veracity of your conspiracy although it's extremely tenuous.
no you didn't. you didn't refute the fact that images save on a PC just by visiting a page

you can find them yourself:
wikihow.com/Locate-Temporary-Internet-Files
>This wikiHow teaches you how to view a list of your browser's temporary internet files, which are pieces of data that help quickly load frequently visited sites. You cannot view temporary internet files on a mobile item such as a smartphone or a tablet.

also we know files aren't permanently deleted, as I pointed out. and any decent encryption can't be decrypted, they didn't even claim it was!

>WHAT WOULD THEY BE COVERING UP?
his motive. you're claiming he had no motive, but he went through all that fucking effort. pathetic

>No it isn't. My argument is:
>The police said he had cp on his computer
>I believe the results of this investigation
so it's simply faith in the police force. obviously

>Your argument is:
>He could not have had CP on his computer because:
nope, i didn't say he couldn't. if he ever went to a web page with CP on it, it would have saved to his temp folder, and it could have been recovered using basic software. same if you went on a CP site (on accident) today, and cops snagged your laptop tomorrow.

>There's no reason to believe he didn't encrypt it
except they didn't claim that, and also if he did they couldn't have decrypted it.

>Why would they lie about this? Give me one good reason?
to hide a motive. so that they could classify it and make it so fewer people could see it. so more people just think he's a crazy madman with no motive, just pure insanity.

>CP is not really that hard to find
and if it was found on accident, it would be saved to his temp files and unless he used a HD wiping program, it could be recovered

>>temp folder
>This is just not a true thing. Once again proof or gtfo
>>save to your computer
>proof or gtfo
fuck off retard, you didn't even google it. see the link here: you're seriously computer illiterate, aren't you?

>That is not hard to do you fool this link is very simple, it walks you step by step how to delete certain files once they're in a level that is generally inaccessible to deletion by someone who doesn't know how to talk to the inner parts of the computer.
>This article also explains a method for DELETION. As I've already stated I don't think he ever wanted to delete those files. He most likely wanted to save them for later if he ever escaped.
yeah and if you don't do that to deleted files (including temp files) they can be recovered using basic software

basically, pic related saved to your HD in the temp folder. unless you use some software to delete it, it can be recovered. same w CP

Attached: pineapple.jpg (630x630, 117K)

[The latest body camera video]
freedomoutpost.com/cbs-news-bodycam-footage-from-las-vegas-shooting-shows-police-believed-there-were-multiple-shooters/ 2
was made public on Wednesday and shows police officers leading people to safety outside a Las Vegas hotel and clearly, they believed there were multiple shooters.
CBS cbsnews.com/news/las-vegas-shooting-police-body-cam-footage-released-today-2018-07-25/ reports:
cbsnews.com/news/las-vegas-shooting-police-body-cam-footage-released-today-2018-07-25/
More police body camera footage made public Wednesday shows officers directing concertgoers to safety and searching for what they thought were multiple shooters inside and outside a [Las Vegas Strip hotel]where a gunman opened fire in the deadliest mass shooting in modern American history. Eight more video recordings, totaling almost eight hours, were released by Las Vegas police under a court order in a public records lawsuit by media including The Associated Press.
cbsnews.com/news/las-vegas-shooting-documents-gunman-stephen-paddock-witnesses/
One shows a team of police starting on the roof of the Mandalay Bay resort and working their way downstairs.
Another shows officers directing people to evacuate from beneath the main stage of the Route 91 Harvest Festival venue. Two men rush past, carrying an injured woman.
Another showed teams with assault rifles ushering people out of concrete flood-control channels.

26d

Many of those who survived the shooting reported multiple gunmen. Then many of these witnesses died or disappeared. Multiple gunmen sounds more feasible than 1 as no way can 1 person kill so many with a gun on a crowd unless he was at a high vantage point. It was likely a deep state attack probably to bring back the argument of gun control.
lvcriminaldefense.com/eight-las-vegas-witnesses-dead-within-30-days-attack/

paulcraigroberts.org/2017/10/09/military-surgeon-says-videos-las-vegas-gunshot-victims-fake/

I think paddock was what you call a plug. Just like Jeffrey Lash who died in California (cancer) back in 2015. After they found his body then they found a weapons cache in his house worth about 5-10 million. Jeffrey Lash never had a job in his life but he was living the high life and had multiple vehicles upgraded to the max for war and also had his offense for concealing a fire arm in his vehicle removed from his record (within a couple of weeks of the offense) in the state of California :thinking:

A plug is someone who sells guns for the government for any kind of purpose. I think paddock was an arms dealer and was taken advantage of.

>Saudi "terrorists" wanted to assassinate Saudi prince.
>Alphabet agencies tried to pull a "fast and furious" style sting.
>neither side wants the public to know because ww3 and competency issues
>saudis set up murdered dealer as lone gunmen
>alphabet agencies go along with it
>hotel and other civies forced to assist in coverup

Attached: vegas-saudi.jpg (1151x2551, 494K)

don't blame them it's not their fault, men have a tendency to rate peoples looks accurately rather than thinking 80% of the opposite sex is ugly like good normal people.

He didn't. Steve was just a random boomer the CIA decided to blame.

Because Country music fucking sucks.
Dude was just chillin in his hotel until he snapped and could not take it anymore

Attached: 9D912977-B726-4641-A7AC-C6CFCC4FC434.jpg (625x705, 81K)

Also fuck all you faggot ITT with your long ass text posts, taking up alot of space and shit