Things associated with low IQ, how many apply to you?

Careful overweight cucks , dont get too excited, you don't want to suffer a stroke

none of these
orginal

Non Of them I am probably below average IQ

If you have even the slightest hint on how to think you would know that veganism is easily the right way to go. If people argue using facts veganism would always win just because humans are proven to not need meat in their diet and vegan way is more sustainable in the long run. Also the diet of the average person, while still shit, would a least be a bit healthier. While I don't give a fuck about all animals and for all I care we can keep on torturing animals simply because they will never revolt against us for some people the argument that we could lower overall suffering also works. While I am not vegan if we had a vote for the entire country where I live to go vegan I would vote yes because logically it's the right choice.

The problem with your argument is that because of cognitive biases, motivated reasoning, it's perfectly possible for people with high IQ to have low many IQ ideas. In those cases they will use their intelligence to more intelligently defend those stupid ideas, instead of actually asking the question "is this idea I hold actually true?".

The fact that those ideas are usually associated with low IQ suggests that they are not intelligent ideas, but many high IQ people can hold these ideas because how the mind works and can be compartmentalised.

After all, many suicide bombers who literally believe that 72 virgins await them if they blow themselves up are engineers and doctors, otherwise high IQ people.
We can all agree that's a really brainlet idea.

Why are you giving reasons to a NPC incel cuck?
They only know how to suffer

>Careful overweight cucks , dont get too excited, you don't want to suffer a stroke

My BMI is 19.

Don't you have some dead rats to weep over, Mr. Sensitive? Why are you shitposting when there are dead vermin to grieve?

Whatever you say incel. Don't you have to be jerkin off to some tranny porn and anime pictures?

The man with the highest IQ believes in god. OP btfo kike shill
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Langan

1/6
I like to believe there is a god.

I'm racist only against gypshits. And I hate flamboyant faggots, butch dykes and trannies.

>muh kike shills

>he doesn't know this website is full of atheistcuck fedoratippers and trolls posting for (you)s
back to >>>/p*l/

*washes down supplement pill with s.o.ylent*

This.
People give to much credit to IQ. They use it in arguments in whatever way they want even if the way they use it in different cases contradicts itself.
The funny thing is that they think IQ is something like a fact at this point. Like saying that gravity exist or that earth is round. While it has a very good prediction potential for most people it's not even that clear at this point what it actually measures.
People like to go with whatever they like and internet only helps them keeping those misinformed ideas. Example of this is race realism. While they are right that we can categorize people on the basis of what we call race it's not clear where are the boundaries between each race. We can either say that there are thousands of races in which case the catogarization is useless or we can make something more arbitrary the boundary like skin color. The same people that can't stop talking about how black people are not the same as them think they are the same race as the man with the same skin color but that is twice as tall as them has different eye and hair color and IQ difference is clear to the naked eye for everyone around.

Today the the more (((educated))) you are the more leftist you become. If high IQ is positively correlated with high education level within the study then the study is useless because the education system has been overrun by Marxists and Jews. Take a sample of STEM graduates and it's probably 50-50.

t. based and redpilled STEM grad

You got me there dude. I give up. Gonna go watch my wife get fucked by Tyrone. haHaa

*Washes down Viagra for erectile dysfunction

>fell for the cs/engineering meme
>redpilled
wew lad, enjoy being a wagie

Attached: suppository-pepe.jpg (960x727, 48K)

>the more (((educated))) you are the more leftist you become
The only correct explanation.

>saying things like "things that have been scientifically proven"

Believing vaccinations cause autism

Things proven to be linked to soiboy beta cuck weakness:
-anti-religiosity
-supporting gay marriage and rights
-egalitarianism
-not hating Jews
-supporting racial equality
-being OP

What if I'm all of these things but ironically?

No problem I guess.

Despite being a leftist myself, I gotta admit happy merchant memes are pretty funny.

>While they are right that we can categorize people on the basis of what we call race it's not clear where are the boundaries between each race. We can either say that there are thousands of races in which case the catogarization is useless or we can make something more arbitrary the boundary like skin color
We can say there are infinite colors between red and yellow, but it doesn't mean red and yellow doesn't exist.

you forgot to add identity politics op

False equivalent. My argument goes more like this. Let's say we have 2 cars Ford and Wolkvagen. I say we have 2 cars because one is SUV and the other is Hatchback, another person says it's the same car because both are red and the third person says 2 different companies made them so that is why they are different. I think all of them would be right in some sense depending on how you look at the situation. The problem begins when you derive ought from that. We ought to drive Hatchback because they burn less than SUV. It's not like that is true from every point of view.
Even the people that say they are just stating facts by talking about race realism I think have some underlying intentions that are kind of close to racism. They just hide behind "facts" (which again are not facts they just chose to look at one thing from the perspective that they agree with) and they leave the ought to other more openly racist people. Ohhh black are less smart? We ought to enslave them. They give that power to think that they are right in that backward thinking to less intelligent people.

found the brainwashed Jow Forumstard

racism is proven to be associated with low iq. And it makes sense too. Racism highly correlates with low scores on the "Openness" dimension on the Big 5 scale, which is the only dimension that correlates strongly with intelligence. People high in openness consistently have higher IQs than those low in openness

>(((IQ)))
Who gives a fuck what some number based on some Jew test based on Jew standards says?

Oh so when it's not in your favor it's a "Jew test based on Jew standards", but when it is in your favor it's proof that nonwhites are subhuman because they have lower iq?

Attached: lmao.jpg (228x221, 16K)

Not the guy you are responding to but it's impossible to argue with people like you. Not because you are smart or the facts are on your side. Oh no, you just will dismiss everything so everything I or anyone will say will not get through your skull. You may think that you win by doing this but you are soo far from reality that I think no one even wants to win against you.

None, i guess I am just too smart for my own good.
Good thread, OP, totally no shit post XD

Attached: 9340354C-92B3-4D9D-A872-C9D6D0CDB8A5.gif (200x150, 1.65M)

all of them and my iq is 190

An intelligence quotient test really only determines a person's ability to detect and manifest patterns.
Being a race realist would correlate to high IQ as you would be perceptive enough to know that there are reliable trends among races that stem not just from culture but also from biological factors that pertain just to race.
It would be extremely low-IQ to ignore such statistical evidence in favor of valuing everyone's feefees as reality.

Silly retard, loving and accepting differences IS the low IQ view of life, it's completely unrealistic and ignores reality. OP just happens to be complete bullshit.

Nice conjecture but it's proven wrong by reality. See this

By your own logic, NOT accepting differences is low iq. You make the premises that realism = high iq, therefor being in touch with reality is high iq. NOT accepting differences and trying to impose a made up worldview is the opposite of being in touch with reality, thus by your own logic accepting differences high iq and not accepting them is low iq.

Ok then as a perceptive person you can tell that a person with the height of let's say 5'9" and a person that is 2 feet tall is not of the same race. No? Yeah, I thought so. So now you will back off to saying that it's also about the geographical location and the features that they present. But again you are just randomly choosing what patterns to focus on, in this case, geographical location. Yeah, patterns are everywhere like faces on the moon. Does not mean that they are worth anything and need to be categorized with other objects that display those patterns.

Low tier bait, even lower tier retards falling for it

I agree with everything except religion. Some of the smartest people I know are religious.

These correlate with high EQ, which in turn often does correlate with high IQ. Although on occasion, especially among introverted people, the IQ is high and the EQ is low. Having these traits doesn't mean you're low IQ 100%, believing that would be a low IQ ideology

We don't need meat because we now have onions and protein replacing supplements we didn't have for centuries. We evolved the way we did because we ate meat, if we didn't hunt in groups we would have never been able to communicate the way we do, we wouldn't have formed large communities, built structures or be as social as we are. if we weren't a predatory species we would still be flinging shit at each other. Veganism is not healthier, a balanced diet is healthier. A balanced diet contains meat. Eating meat is what developed our brain so rapidly and is the reason we are humanity.

>incel
Please fuck off back to r*ddit

WOAH I swear on my life I didn't put onions there I typed onions products...That's some freaky shit

Definitely a reddit cuck projecting onto anons. Never heard anyone besides redditors unironically call people an incel in an argument.

Ok what is going on I'm getting freaked the fuck out. Onions. I said onions. This better not be say onions when I post it

>We don't need meat because we now have onions and protein replacing supplements we didn't have for centuries
Protein is not a concern for vegans, we only have to take b12 and vitamin d if we don't take enough sunlight.

>We evolved the way we did because we ate meat, if we didn't hunt in groups we would have never been able to communicate the way we do, we wouldn't have formed large communities, built structures or be as social as we are. if we weren't a predatory species we would still be flinging shit at each other.
Completely irrelevant. If our ancestors didn't rape each other we probably would not be here, it's irrelevant to whether rape would have the same effect today or if it is a good thing today. What we had to do in the past to survive is irrelevant to what we have to do today and what is good to do today.

>Veganism is not healthier, a balanced diet is healthier.
All the available scientific evidence suggests that vegans have better health outcomes than meat eaters, even when controlled for BMI, exercise, and so on.
At best, the vegan diet is healthier, at worst, there is no difference, which means eating meat is not necessary.

>Eating meat is what developed our brain so rapidly and is the reason we are humanity.
False, what developed our brain was cooking the food (allowed for more calories to be consumed) and for the majority of our evolution we were based mostly on plants. But this is irrelevant. Even assuming that meat was the cause, it doesn't mean that TODAY eating meat is going to increase anybody's brain. In fact vegetarians and vegans have higher IQs than meat eaters.

Attached: 1529914586862.jpg (617x729, 42K)

I wonder, I ponder, who could possibly be behind this post?

Attached: 1536225745634.png (477x292, 201K)

>protein is not a concern for vegans
Tell me plant that allows you to intake all amino acids and proteins that build the human body
>if we didn't rape each other we probably wouldn't be here
That's just retarded, there's no evidence that rape was a means to breeding in ancient times. It's relevant because its what made us what we are, it's the reason you can sit here and argue to me about being a faggot vegan
>Eating meat is not necessary
See my first point
>cooking meat. Plants were not the reason we developed our big brain, retard. Remember what I said about how hunting made us what we are today? Also I want a source that's not liberal shilling about high IQ's being linked to veganism.
You're a bad shill

Attached: kiked.jpg (501x585, 43K)

Unless you are literally prof diagnosed for reasons out of youre choosing you are a literally just narcisist if you talk about iq.

Im 135, its bad cause i rationalize shitposting on Jow Forums as heloing raise the average iq median, which is important as 4 is becoming world politics

There are tons of evidence that vegan diet is as healthy and some argue that it's even healthier. While I would not go as far as to say it's healthier (most of the studies that said that did not control for vegans just eating better products overall) saying that it's as healthy as the one that includes animal products is at this point indisputable. For society overall it would also be better, it is much more long-term sustainable and would have a lesser effect on the environment overall. While I don't actually give a single fuck about animals or the whole reducing suffering thing I still think you have to be pretty dumb not to see that the vegan side is much easier to argue on. Still, I don't think anything I said will get to a person that thinks jew stand behind every bad thing in the world.

>Tell me plant that allows you to intake all amino acids and proteins that build the human body
Most plants have all essential amino acids, just in different amounts. An example of a food that contain a lot of protein in all essential amino acids is legumes like beans, one of the healthiest foods out there.
Again, the data suggests that vegans have no problem with protein.

>That's just retarded, there's no evidence that rape was a means to breeding in ancient times.
Yes there is, but you can swap it for anything that we had to do that contributed to us being here today that now we consider abominable, surely you can think about plenty of examples.

>It's relevant because its what made us what we are, it's the reason you can sit here and argue to me about being a faggot vegan
Which doesn't make it relevant. If eating meat today is not necessary and probably even unhealthy, what we had to do in our evolutionary history one way or the other is irrelevant.

>Cooking meat. Plants were not the reason we developed our big brain, retard.
Cooking in general especially starches allowed to get more calories in, this is what contributed, not cooking the meat specifically. But even if you're right, it's irrelevant to what is going to make you more intelligent today, as I said.

>Also I want a source that's not liberal shilling about high IQ's being linked to veganism.
I said vegetarianism/veganism, aka concerns for animal rights is associated to higher IQ, there are no studies on vegans but several on vegetarians. People who are more intelligent are more likely to become vegetarian/vegan, while brainlets are more likely to think that "eating meat is manly".

It's a peer-reviewed paper, so no "liberal shilling"
bmj.com/content/334/7587/245.short

can we get the links on these studies?

The Incel is mad because his safe space got invaded

hahahha ok little incel, go play with you anime toys,

I am spiritual but not religious
I'm too smart for organized religion

Attached: 1498543323488.png (500x590, 19K)

>a person with the height of let's say 5'9" and a person that is 2 feet tall is not of the same race.
Literally smacked my forehead when I read that. Height is based on the height of your parents, not your race, and varies greatly between races. But yes, certain races do exhibit different average heights, with asians being shorter and africans being taller. That's like saying oh your brother is a foot taller than you so you're not the same race. Oh your brother has blue eyes and you have brown, so you're not the same race. How can we not be of the same race if we come from parents of the same race? The difference between races comes from looking at the traits exclusive to race. I may have different eye color than my brother, but that is because we are white. If we were african, we would both have brown eyes. Most whites have thin lips and slender noses. Most blacks have big lips and broad noses. It is worth categorization if you find many underlying traits that apply to certain races and can identify someone's race by finding these factors.

>Hahaha redditors I got this incel!! *edit thanks for the gold goys!!

>religiosity
top kek

>After all, many suicide bombers who literally believe that 72 virgins await them if they blow themselves up are engineers and doctors, otherwise high IQ people.
i think you forgot the fact that they're brown. they never had a high iq

>claims to be smart
>is "spiritual" (whatever that means)
LMAO

>-religiosity
132 IQ reporting in.

>Replies in less than a minute

hahahahahaha

Attached: wojpu.png (272x204, 30K)

>antisemitism
>xenophobia and racism
>if you are unable to recognize a pattern then youre smart!
i thought iq tests were all about recognizing patterns?

Recognizing patterns that are useful and/or true

>Religious?
Yes
>Homophobic?
No
>Racist?
Sometimes
Whats speciesism?

>Whats speciesism?

Speciesism involves the assignment of different values, rights, or special consideration to individuals solely on the basis of their species membership. The term is sometimes used by animal rights advocates, who argue that speciesism is a prejudice similar to racism or sexism, in that the treatment of individuals is predicated on group membership and morally irrelevant physical differences. Their claim is that species membership has no moral significance.

>most plants have essential amino acids, just in different amounts
So that means that we need to use up more landing for a wider variation of plants just so vegans can get their proper acids, opposed to using a smaller amount of land for animals which have all amino acids
>Yes there is
Care to elaborate and provide evidence that we needed to rape women to breed, besides the testosterone theories, which can be discredited due to the fact that men had to be aggressive in order to be the dominant male which would naturally attract women, who would consent to have having a mate who could care for her, feed her and protect her?
>what we had to do in our evolutionary history one way or the other is irrelevant.
Okay so then what you said about cooking and eating vegetables is also irrelevant, since things we did in that contributed to our evolution is irrelevant
>High IQ for animal rights, low IQ for manly meat eaters11!11!!
Okay, plenty meat eaters no that animal abuse is terrible, like myself, I truly feel for those animals which is why I hunt for most of my meat. I believe the healthier the soul of the beast you eat, the healthier it is for your soul and body. High EQ people support animal rights, high EQ correlates, for the most part, with high IQ. No doubt there are retards who eat meat because they believe it to be manly, but to generalize every meat eater is just ridiculous.
>Peer reviewed
I wonder if peers can be biased in liberal ideologies?

all of them, but i'm pretty smart compared to my normie coworkers

Excuse me sir i dont mean to intrude on your little mishap but are you trying to say onions? s.o.y.

IQ and religiosity
cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science/article/iq-and-the-values-of-nations/B28886FC682668151084DF2E9DC5C0AF

IQ and homosexuality acceptance:
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289615000975

IQ and racism:
The association between racism and sexism and IQ is well known, here's a random example:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/1097-4679(195710)13:4<338::AID-JCLP2270130405>3.0.CO;2-4

IQ and speciesism:
Speciesism correlates positively with racism, sexism, and homophobia, and seems to be underpinned by the same socio-ideological beliefs:
static1.squarespace.com/static/59e80366a9db098f5ce8f8ad/t/5a63586971c10be0a0556a01/1516460139811/z2g-4664_FPP.pdf

Yes I am rarted

You are simply speculating, tough. Just because something has a weak correlation with something other does not mean that they the first necessary causes the other. Neither does it mean that the correlation never reverses.
Since our (((media))) and (((universities))) have been converted into brainwashing camps, and going to university as well as consuming political media is correlated with intelligence, you would expect more intelligent people to be more brainwashed. It doesn't imply that these ideas are fundamentally more intelligent, just that intelligent people are more targeted. You would expect that from a movement of cultural subversion, but keep believing that your midwit opinions you love to parrot excuse you for being a worthless so*boy cuck.
All categories you presented are valid, retard. Doesn't mean that "red cars" do not exist.

Bottom line : Midwits gonna midwit.

Attached: (You).jpg (645x588, 29K)

While you entirely missed my point about height, hair and eye color, I can agree with some of the points you made. Certain types of categorization are definitely useful. While I can't say specifically I know that Black Africans from a certain region were and are more prone to certain disease even after a few generations of living in America. While we know now what caused that (i think it was exposure to malaria or something like that) that categorization would be useful. At the same time you can't (but you probably will) deny that most of the time when people on the internet start talking about race realism, even if they say that they are just stating facts, they are just dog whistling to more openly racist people and enabling them to think that they are right in the way they think. Again it's nice to state facts like we are living in a vacuum but in real life people, derive ought from these things that are again not really facts.

You forgot the part where leftism is associated with litteral brain-damage.

>recognizing statistics about blacks that if acted upon would lead to a lower crime rate is not useful

Also while I could go and argue with you here is a 2-hour long debate on race realism and my standing on it is pretty clearly presented by the person speaking in the video.
youtube.com/watch?v=xRHTD0YMfpM

How would it be acted upon?

Nice try shill. Gtfo and shove your shitty agenda up your ass

Hmm, really makes you think.
I wonder who could be behind that study.

Attached: thosewhofoughtforabetterworld.png (1705x775, 147K)

>top level government officials had a high IQ
shocking, it must have been because they were Nazis

I like how you faggots never question the validity of the IQ test, which is effectively the score of your ability to take an IQ test and doesn't take into account a large number of factors that determine the overall intelligence of an individual.

>inb4 low-iq tester
Never taken an IQ test, don't feel the need to take one as I don't use it to frame my perceived or projected intelligence.

People who brag about their high iq are the watered down version of "my huge peepee is 9in long"

That's a fair definition.

It is important to note though that being anti-speciesist doesn't mean that you think all animals are equals. It depends on the characteristics of the animals in question. For example insects don't have the same characteristics (level of sentience) than mammals, whereas bivalves are technically animals but are not sentient at all.

Speciesism is the belief in a higher moral worth solely based on species, even when the characteristics of the beings in questions have been equalised.
For example thinking that it's ok to kill a pig but not a dog, or that it's abominable to kill a mentally retarded human but perfectly fine to kill another animal with the same level of all relevant characteristics (intelligence, ability to interpret the world) etc.

>implying US government officials of the time had high IQ
lol, you should look at how they supported the KMT even though the KMT were evidently fuckwit idiots.

Attached: 1532971812458.png (490x380, 129K)

Tests have shown that racists exist in all bands of the IQ scale, it just happens that more intelligent people don't tend to be publicly racist, for obvious reasons.

>if they were high IQ they would have supported the gommies instead
huh? The KMT would have been fine if they hadn't been for the Japanese followed by the soviets. Also
>Judging people against the fucking Nazis on who they pick to side with

Citation needed.
Citation needed.
Citation needed.
Citation needed.

>The KMT would have been fine if they hadn't been for the Japanese followed by the soviets

'The US strongly supported the Kuomintang forces. About 50,000 US soldiers were sent to guard strategic sites in Hupeh and Shandong. The US equipped and trained KMT troops, and transported Japanese and Koreans back to help KMT forces to occupy liberated zones as well as to contain Communist-controlled areas.[43] American aid included substantial amounts of mostly surplus military supplies, and loans were made to the KMT.[51] Within less than two years after the Sino-Japanese War, the KMT had received $4.43 billion from the US--most of which was military aid.[43]'

'Strong American support for the Nationalists was hedged with the failure of the Marshall Mission, and then stopped completely mainly because of KMT corruption [75] (such as the notorious Yangtze Development Corporation [76] controlled by H.H. Kung and T. V. Soong's family) [77] and KMT's military setback in Northeast China. '

'Chiang wrote in his diary in June 1948 that the KMT had failed not because of external enemies but because of rot from within.[73]'

Attached: 1532973405944.png (255x200, 84K)

I'm a race realist and also a "racist". My "racism" is pure and simple derivation from racial reality as genetic proximity given by natural selection is 1. beneficial for the mental sanity of individuals (mixed-race individuals are psychologically deficient) 2. beneficial for the society as a whole (short and long term social cohesion are destroyed by incompatible genetics) 3. a warrant of the protection of my genetic heritage (people of my own race are closer to me genetically).
Unless you're a cuck, if you don't agree with me you're the inferior mind, you're just a midwit barely intelligent enough to be able to understand and repeat the drivel fed to us by the fake intellectuals of our time but not intelligent enough to be able to see beyond it.

I'm pretty sure the Japs played a small part at least. Anyway would a balkanised China really have been that bad, China makes much more sense as a continent than a country. Who the fuck else were the burgers supposed to support anyway? Re-establishing the Nipponese empire just this time with Mcdonalds?